Skip to main content

architecture

Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering.

Informações da origem

Repositório
managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting
Última atividade na origem
5 de maio de 2026 às 08:04
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
30
Forks
2

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos
4 arquivos

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
architecture
description
Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering.
compatibility
Best when project structure, service boundaries, or long-term maintainability are in scope.
# .NET Architecture ## Trigger On - choosing architecture for a new or evolving .NET system - reviewing layer boundaries, domain boundaries, or service decomposition - deciding whether clean architecture, vertical slices, CQRS, or microservices are justified ## Workflow 1. Start from business capability boundaries and change frequency, not from a preferred diagram style. 2. Use simple modular monolith patterns by default, and move to microservices only when team autonomy, scale, or deployment boundaries justify the added operational cost. 3. Apply DDD and CQRS where business rules are genuinely complex; avoid forcing aggregates and command pipelines into CRUD-heavy code with no payoff. 4. Keep dependencies flowing inward when using clean architecture, but avoid creating extra projects that add ceremony without ownership clarity. 5. Make integration boundaries explicit: contracts, storage ownership, messaging, consistency model, and observability expectations. 6. Use `aspire` when local orchestration, service discovery, and developer observability are part of the architecture story. ## Deliver - an architecture direction that matches system complexity - clear project and dependency boundaries - migration notes or tradeoffs when changing an existing structure ## Validate - the proposed structure reduces rather than increases accidental complexity - data ownership and integration paths are explicit - the architecture is testable and operable, not just diagram-friendly ## References - [references/patterns.md](references/patterns.md) - detailed implementations of Clean Architecture, Vertical Slices, DDD, CQRS, Modular Monolith, and Microservices with C# 12+ examples - [references/anti-patterns.md](references/anti-patterns.md) - common architectural mistakes including over-abstraction, anemic domain models, premature microservices, and cargo cult patterns
Ver no GitHub