Skip to main content

github-pr-fixup

{url} address comments left on a GitHub pull request. Use when a user wants review comments and CI failures fixed on an existing GitHub pull request without opening a new PR.

Informações da origem

Repositório
markphelps/skills
Última atividade na origem
28 de maio de 2026 às 23:32
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
5
Forks
0

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
github-pr-fixup
description
{url} address comments left on a GitHub pull request. Use when a user wants review comments and CI failures fixed on an existing GitHub pull request without opening a new PR.
# GitHub PR Fixup Fix review feedback and CI failures on an existing GitHub pull request. Work on the PR's source branch. Do not open a new PR. ## Required tools Verify both tools exist before doing anything else: ```bash gh --version jq --version ``` If either command is missing, stop and tell the user to run: ```bash brew install gh jq ``` ## Inputs - GitHub URL: `$ARGUMENTS` Extract the PR number from the URL: ```bash PR_NUMBER="$(echo "$ARGUMENTS" | grep -oE '[0-9]+$')" ``` Stop if `PR_NUMBER` is empty. ## Workflow 1. Check out the existing PR branch. ```bash gh pr checkout "$PR_NUMBER" ``` 2. Read PR metadata you will need later. ```bash gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --json number,title,headRefName,headRepositoryOwner,headRepository,headRefOid,baseRefName,url ``` 3. Gather unresolved review feedback. Use GraphQL so you can ignore resolved threads and outdated comments. ```bash gh api graphql -f query=' query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $number: Int!) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { pullRequest(number: $number) { reviewThreads(first: 100) { nodes { isResolved isOutdated path line comments(first: 20) { nodes { author { login } body createdAt url } } } } } } }' -F owner="$(gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --json headRepositoryOwner -q '.headRepositoryOwner.login')" -F repo="$(gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --json headRepository -q '.headRepository.name')" -F number="$PR_NUMBER" ``` Focus only on threads where: - `isResolved == false` - `isOutdated == false` Read each active thread carefully. Fix the requested changes in code, tests, docs, or config as needed. If comments conflict, prefer the most recent reviewer guidance and note the conflict in your final summary. 4. Check CI status for the PR head commit. ```bash HEAD_SHA="$(gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --json headRefOid -q '.headRefOid')" gh pr checks "$PR_NUMBER" gh run list --commit "$HEAD_SHA" --json databaseId,status,conclusion,name,event,workflowName,headSha,url ``` 5. Investigate failed runs only. Filter for failing runs: ```bash gh run list --commit "$HEAD_SHA" --json databaseId,status,conclusion,name,event,workflowName,url | jq '.[] | select(.conclusion == "failure")' ``` For each failed run: ```bash gh run view <run-id> --log-failed ``` Diagnose the underlying failure from the failed job log. Do not patch symptoms blindly. Fix the actual issue in code or configuration. 6. Verify locally. Run the smallest relevant validation that covers the fixes you made. Prefer repo-native lint, unit, or integration commands over broad full-suite runs when scope is small. If full local verification is not possible, explain why and state what you did run. 7. Commit and push fixes to the existing source branch. Do not create a new branch and do not create a new PR. ## Guardrails - Never open a new PR. - Never resolve review threads unless the user explicitly asks. - Ignore resolved and outdated review threads. - Prefer the PR head repository and branch already associated with the PR. - Keep fixes scoped to active review feedback and failing CI unless you find a directly related root cause. - If a CI failure depends on unavailable secrets, external services, or flaky infrastructure, state that clearly and avoid speculative code changes. ## Final response Report: - what unresolved review comments you addressed - which CI failures you fixed - what validation you ran - any remaining blockers you could not complete
Ver no GitHub