Skip to main content

multi-agent

Split work across agents without losing control, with one worktree and prompt file per task and a coordinator who integrates. Use when dispatching more than one agent or writing a brief for another agent.

Informações da origem

Repositório
MasihMoafi/skills
Última atividade na origem
3 de novembro de 2026 às 08:35
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
8
Forks
0

multi-agent: one task per worktree

Splits independent work across agents with one branch, worktree, prompt file and acceptance check each, under a coordinator who integrates.

Uses

Use when dispatching more than one agent or writing a brief for another agent. Parallelize only independent tasks.

How to use

Coordinator owns the task list → create a worktree and WORKER_PROMPT.md per task with allowed files, forbidden scope and acceptance tests → workers return summary, files, checks and risks → integrate one branch at a time and rerun acceptance on the merged tree.

Limitations

Do not run two writers on the same interface or shared contract still in flux. Read-only reviewers may share a tree if writes are forbidden.

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
multi-agent
description
Split work across agents without losing control, with one worktree and prompt file per task and a coordinator who integrates. Use when dispatching more than one agent or writing a brief for another agent.
# Multi-agent dispatch Run agents in parallel only on independent tasks: two agents editing one interface produce two plausible diffs that cannot both be right. The unit is **one task, one branch, one worktree, one prompt file, one acceptance check**. Read-only reviewers may share a tree if writes are forbidden. ## Roles - **Coordinator:** owns the task list, architecture, order, integration and the verification label. Creates and removes worktrees and picks each task's model. Never lets a worker redefine the product. - **Worker:** does one bounded task in its own worktree and returns changed files, checks run, evidence and risks. Touches nothing outside its scope. - **User:** decides product behavior and accepts the result. ## Setup Use the worktree location and base the project names; do not assume the default branch holds the work the task needs. `git worktree add "$path" -b "$branch" "$base"`. Put the prompt in `WORKER_PROMPT.md` at that worktree's root, marked "Do not commit it". Remove the worktree only after its branch is integrated or abandoned. ## The prompt contract A missing or contradictory field is a reason to challenge the task, not to start. ```text Task ID: Desired user-visible behavior: what a person sees, not an implementation Why it is needed: Allowed files: a real list, plus a rule for the ragged edge Forbidden scope: the specific temptations (adjacent refactors, coordinator files, publishing) Dependencies already verified: Acceptance test: numbered; each item can fail Required checks: build flags, disk limits, commands never to run, what runs on CI Return: summary, changed files, verification, risks, commit hash. ``` Put every binding constraint in the prompt: what cannot be verified here and the ceiling of what CI can prove; disk-heavy build flags; "report, do not patch" for observation tasks. When a null result is legitimate, say so ("if the only lever costs more than it buys, report that and close"), so the worker does not ship churn. ## Before dispatching Serialize two tasks when their allowed files intersect, when they touch a shared runtime, protocol or permission contract still being reshaped, when they would exhaust one disk or CPU, or when they install to the same path or app home. ## Verification and integration Label each result `user-verified` (the only "done"), `agent-verified`, or `unverifiable here` (name what would be needed); the ranking is in the [spec skill](../spec/SKILL.md#4-verify). Integrate one branch at a time and rerun the acceptance test on the merged tree.
Ver no GitHub