Skip to main content

openjudge

Build custom LLM evaluation pipelines using the OpenJudge framework. Covers selecting and configuring graders (LLM-based, function-based, agentic), running batch evaluations with GradingRunner, combining scores with aggregators, applying evaluation strategies (voting, average), auto-generating graders from data, and analyzing results (pairwise win rates, statistics, validation metrics). Use when the user wants to evaluate LLM outputs, compare multiple models, design scoring criteria, or build an automated evaluation system.

Informações da origem

Repositório
modelscope/AgentJet
Última atividade na origem
11 de março de 2026 às 04:05
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
239
Forks
28

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos
5 arquivos

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
openjudge
description
Build custom LLM evaluation pipelines using the OpenJudge framework. Covers selecting and configuring graders (LLM-based, function-based, agentic), running batch evaluations with GradingRunner, combining scores with aggregators, applying evaluation strategies (voting, average), auto-generating graders from data, and analyzing results (pairwise win rates, statistics, validation metrics). Use when the user wants to evaluate LLM outputs, compare multiple models, design scoring criteria, or build an automated evaluation system.
# OpenJudge Skill Build evaluation pipelines for LLM applications using the `openjudge` library. ## When to Use This Skill - User wants to evaluate LLM output quality (correctness, relevance, hallucination, etc.) - User wants to compare two or more models and rank them - User wants to design a scoring rubric and automate evaluation - User wants to analyze evaluation results statistically - User wants to build a reward model or quality filter ## Sub-documents — Read When Relevant | Topic | File | Read when… | |-------|------|------------| | Grader selection & configuration | `graders.md` | User needs to pick or configure an evaluator | | Batch evaluation pipeline | `pipeline.md` | User needs to run evaluation over a dataset | | Auto-generate graders from data | `generator.md` | No rubric yet; generate from labeled examples | | Analyze & compare results | `analyzer.md` | User wants win rates, statistics, or metrics | Read the relevant sub-document **before** writing any code. ## Install ```bash pip install py-openjudge ``` ## Architecture Overview ``` Dataset (List[dict]) │ ▼ GradingRunner ← orchestrates everything │ ├─► Grader A ──► EvaluationStrategy ──► _aevaluate() ──► GraderScore / GraderRank ├─► Grader B ──► EvaluationStrategy ──► _aevaluate() ──► GraderScore / GraderRank └─► Grader C ... │ ├─► Aggregator (optional) ← combine multiple grader scores into one │ └─► RunnerResult ← {grader_name: [GraderScore, ...]} │ ▼ Analyzer ← statistics, win rates, validation metrics ``` ## 5-Minute Quick Start Evaluate responses for correctness using a built-in grader: ```python import asyncio from openjudge.models.openai_chat_model import OpenAIChatModel from openjudge.graders.common.correctness import CorrectnessGrader from openjudge.runner.grading_runner import GradingRunner # 1. Configure the judge model (OpenAI-compatible endpoint) model = OpenAIChatModel( model="qwen-plus", api_key="sk-xxx", base_url="https://dashscope.aliyuncs.com/compatible-mode/v1", ) # 2. Instantiate a grader grader = CorrectnessGrader(model=model) # 3. Prepare dataset dataset = [ { "query": "What is the capital of France?", "response": "Paris is the capital of France.", "reference_response": "Paris.", }, { "query": "What is 2 + 2?", "response": "The answer is five.", "reference_response": "4.", }, ] # 4. Run evaluation async def main(): runner = GradingRunner( grader_configs={"correctness": grader}, max_concurrency=8, ) results = await runner.arun(dataset) for i, result in enumerate(results["correctness"]): print(f"[{i}] score={result.score} reason={result.reason}") asyncio.run(main()) ``` **Expected output:** ``` [0] score=5 reason=The response accurately states Paris as capital... [1] score=1 reason=The response gives the wrong answer (five vs 4)... ``` ## Key Data Types | Type | Description | |------|-------------| | `GraderScore` | Pointwise result: `.score` (float), `.reason` (str), `.metadata` (dict) | | `GraderRank` | Listwise result: `.rank` (List[int]), `.reason` (str), `.metadata` (dict) | | `GraderError` | Error during evaluation: `.error` (str), `.reason` (str) | | `RunnerResult` | `Dict[str, List[GraderResult]]` — keyed by grader name | ## Result Handling Pattern ```python from openjudge.graders.schema import GraderScore, GraderRank, GraderError for grader_name, grader_results in results.items(): for i, result in enumerate(grader_results): if isinstance(result, GraderScore): print(f"{grader_name}[{i}]: score={result.score}") elif isinstance(result, GraderRank): print(f"{grader_name}[{i}]: rank={result.rank}") elif isinstance(result, GraderError): print(f"{grader_name}[{i}]: ERROR — {result.error}") ``` ## Model Configuration All LLM-based graders accept either a `BaseChatModel` instance or a dict config: ```python # Option A: instance from openjudge.models.openai_chat_model import OpenAIChatModel model = OpenAIChatModel(model="gpt-4o", api_key="sk-...") # Option B: dict (auto-creates OpenAIChatModel) model_cfg = {"model": "gpt-4o", "api_key": "sk-..."} grader = CorrectnessGrader(model=model_cfg) # OpenAI-compatible endpoints (DashScope / local / etc.) model = OpenAIChatModel( model="qwen-plus", api_key="sk-xxx", base_url="https://dashscope.aliyuncs.com/compatible-mode/v1", ) ```
Ver no GitHub