| name | rebuttal-writer |
| description | Write a formal academic rebuttal letter from rebuttal strategy notes and reviewer comments. |
Rebuttal Writer
Use this skill to draft a grounded, formal author response from the paper, raw reviews, merged reviewer questions, and author-approved rebuttal ideas or to-do items.
Workflow
- Read the original paper, raw reviews, merged questions, and rebuttal strategy notes.
- Map every response to the specific reviewer concern it answers; do not merge away reviewer-specific objections unless the strategy explicitly calls for a common response.
- Draft a concise rebuttal with a common response section when useful, followed by per-reviewer responses.
- Use professional, respectful language and concede narrowly when the reviewer is correct.
- Mark missing experimental numbers or evidence as
[TBD]; never invent results, metrics, citations, links, or promised experiments.
- Verify coverage before returning: every reviewer concern is answered, deferred with a reason, or marked as needing user input.
Output Rules
- Return only the rebuttal text unless the user asks for analysis.
- Use LaTeX syntax for mathematical notation.
- Keep tables for numeric evidence only; do not put Q/A prose into large tables.
- Preserve the user's strategy and evidence boundaries.
