Skip to main content

execplans

Write and maintain an ExecPlan — a self-contained, committed Markdown design document in docs/execplans/ — for work that spans more than one session or touches several files or subsystems. Use for a refactor crossing the container/view split, a tooling or dependency migration, adding CI or test coverage,

Informações da origem

Repositório
mozilla/ensemble
Última atividade na origem
15 de outubro de 2026 às 17:23
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
21
Forks
7

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos
2 arquivos

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
execplans
description
Write and maintain an ExecPlan — a self-contained, committed Markdown design document in docs/execplans/ — for work that spans more than one session or touches several files or subsystems. Use for a refactor crossing the container/view split, a tooling or dependency migration, adding CI or test coverage,
# ExecPlans An ExecPlan is a Markdown design document that lives on disk and carries a piece of work from design through implementation. It is the durable record: someone holding only the working tree and the plan file can pick the work up and finish it. Write one instead of relying on the built-in plan/todo tools whenever the work meets the threshold below — those tools don't survive a context reset, and this repo's near-term work (adding CI, broadening test coverage, fixing #409's chart redraw path) is exactly the kind that needs to. Plans in this repository go in `docs/execplans/` and are committed on the working branch. **Read `references/PLANS.md` in full before writing or revising one** — it is the specification, and its final section, "Ensemble addendum", overrides the upstream text wherever the two disagree. The upstream text's own opening instruction to keep plans outside the repository is one of the things the addendum overrides — do not follow it. ## When to use one - The work will not finish in one session. - It touches several files, or crosses the container/view split, the Stylus pipeline, or the build config. - It is a migration or a tooling replacement. - The approach has real unknowns worth proving with a throwaway milestone first. Skip it for a single-file fix, a copy change, or anything a commit title already describes. ## Working sequence 1. Confirm the branch. Work happens on `<issue-number>--kebab-case-summary`. Ask for the issue number if the request doesn't carry one, and read `https://github.com/mozilla/ensemble/issues/<id>` before drafting — `AGENTS.md` requires both. 2. Read `references/PLANS.md`, then start from its skeleton. 3. Create `docs/execplans/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md`, where `<slug>` is the branch's kebab summary. Cite `.claude/skills/execplans/references/PLANS.md` in the plan's header. Write no triple backticks — see the addendum. 4. Fill in real repository context before writing any code: actual paths, actual commands, and acceptance a human can observe by running something. 5. Present the milestone breakdown to the user and get explicit confirmation before executing any of them. This is a one-time gate at the plan/execution boundary, not a per-milestone check-in — see the addendum's "Committing" section for the exact scope. 6. Commit the plan on its own, before the first implementation commit. Then implement, updating `Progress`, `Surprises & Discoveries`, and `Decision Log` in the same commits as the work. Record consequential decisions and surprises, not routine development operations — see the addendum's "Record what matters, not what happened". 7. Write `Outcomes & Retrospective` when the work lands, and commit that too. ## Resuming If `docs/execplans/` already holds a plan for this branch, read it and continue it. Never open a second plan for the same work. A `Progress` section that disagrees with `git log` is a bug in the plan — fix that before doing anything else.
Ver no GitHub