ai-privacy-impact-template

name	ai-privacy-impact-template
description	Provides combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment template with integrated risk scoring matrix. Covers GDPR Art. 35 DPIA elements, AI Act high-risk system requirements, mitigation measures, and human oversight assessment. Keywords: DPIA template, conformity assessment, risk scoring, AI Act, combined assessment, high-risk AI.
license	Apache-2.0
metadata	{"author":"mukul975","version":"1.0","domain":"privacy","subdomain":"ai-privacy-governance","tags":"dpia-template, conformity-assessment, risk-scoring, ai-act, combined-assessment, high-risk"}

Combined DPIA and AI Act Conformity Assessment Template

Overview

High-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act must undergo both a GDPR Art. 35 DPIA and an AI Act conformity assessment. Rather than conducting these as separate exercises, this skill provides an integrated template that satisfies both frameworks simultaneously. The combined assessment ensures consistency between GDPR privacy risk analysis and AI Act safety and fundamental rights evaluation, reduces duplication, and provides a single risk scoring matrix covering both regulatory dimensions. Art. 26(9) AI Act explicitly requires deployers to use DPIA results when fulfilling AI Act obligations.

Combined Risk Scoring Matrix

Risk Dimensions

Dimension	Source	Weight
Privacy risk to data subjects	GDPR Art. 35(7)(c)	30%
Fundamental rights impact	EU AI Act Art. 9(2)(a)	25%
Accuracy and reliability risk	EU AI Act Art. 15	20%
Transparency and explainability gap	GDPR Art. 13(2)(f) + AI Act Art. 13	15%
Human oversight adequacy	GDPR Art. 22 + AI Act Art. 14	10%

Scoring Scale (Per Dimension)

Score	Level	Description
1	Minimal	Risk negligible; controls effective
2	Low	Minor risk; standard controls sufficient
3	Medium	Moderate risk; enhanced controls needed
4	High	Significant risk; intensive mitigation required
5	Critical	Severe risk; may require processing suspension

Overall Risk Classification

Weighted Score	Classification	Action Required
1.0-1.5	Low	Standard monitoring
1.6-2.5	Medium	Enhanced monitoring and periodic review
2.6-3.5	High	Active mitigation and DPO/Board oversight
3.6-4.5	Very High	Art. 36 prior consultation; deployment hold pending mitigation
4.6-5.0	Critical	Do not deploy; fundamental redesign required

GDPR DPIA Requirements (Art. 35(7))

Element	Reference	Combined Assessment Section
Systematic description of processing	Art. 35(7)(a)	Section 2: AI System Description
Necessity and proportionality	Art. 35(7)(b)	Section 3: Necessity Assessment
Risk assessment	Art. 35(7)(c)	Section 5: Combined Risk Register
Mitigation measures	Art. 35(7)(d)	Section 6: Mitigation Measures

AI Act Conformity Assessment Requirements

For high-risk AI systems (Annex III), the conformity assessment per Art. 43 requires:

Element	Reference	Combined Assessment Section
Risk management system	Art. 9	Section 5: Combined Risk Register
Data governance	Art. 10	Section 2: Training Data Governance
Technical documentation	Art. 11	Full combined assessment document
Record-keeping	Art. 12	Section 7: Monitoring and Logging
Transparency	Art. 13	Section 4: Transparency Assessment
Human oversight	Art. 14	Section 4: Human Oversight
Accuracy, robustness, cybersecurity	Art. 15	Section 5: Technical Risk Assessment
Quality management system	Art. 17	Section 8: Quality Management

Mitigation Measures Framework

Technical Measures

Measure	GDPR Relevance	AI Act Relevance	Priority
Differential privacy	Training data protection	Robustness (Art. 15)	High for sensitive data
Model output perturbation	Model inversion protection	Accuracy trade-off (Art. 15)	Medium
Fairness constraints	Non-discrimination (Art. 5(1)(a))	Bias prevention (Art. 10)	High for high-risk
Explainability tools (SHAP/LIME)	Art. 13(2)(f) logic explanation	Interpretability (Art. 13)	High
Input/output PII filtering	Data minimisation (Art. 5(1)(c))	Accuracy (Art. 15)	High for generative AI
Encryption (rest/transit)	Security (Art. 32)	Cybersecurity (Art. 15)	Standard
Access controls (RBAC)	Security (Art. 32)	Cybersecurity (Art. 15)	Standard
Anomaly detection	Breach detection (Art. 33)	Robustness (Art. 15)	Medium

Organisational Measures

Measure	GDPR Relevance	AI Act Relevance
AI ethics review board	Accountability (Art. 5(2))	Quality management (Art. 17)
Model cards	Transparency (Art. 13-14)	Technical documentation (Art. 11)
Regular bias audits	Fairness (Art. 5(1)(a))	Bias monitoring (Art. 10)
Incident response for AI	Breach notification (Art. 33-34)	Post-market monitoring (Art. 72)
Staff training on AI risks	Accountability	Human oversight (Art. 14)
Documentation and record-keeping	Accountability (Art. 5(2))	Record-keeping (Art. 12)

Enforcement Relevance

• AI Act Art. 26(9): Deployers of high-risk AI shall use GDPR Art. 35 DPIA information when fulfilling AI Act obligations — the combined assessment implements this requirement.
• AI Act Art. 43: Conformity assessment procedures for high-risk AI systems.
• GDPR Art. 35: DPIA requirements — the combined template satisfies all Art. 35(7) elements.

Integration Points

• ai-dpia: Combined template extends the AI DPIA methodology
• ai-act-high-risk-docs: Conformity assessment documentation aligns with high-risk requirements
• ai-bias-special-category: Bias assessment results feed into combined risk register
• ai-automated-decisions: Human oversight assessment integrates Art. 22 and Art. 14 requirements