Skip to main content

review-pr

Use when asked to review a GitHub pull request, PR link is shared, or user says /review-pr

Informações da origem

Repositório
music-assistant/server
Última atividade na origem
28 de julho de 2026 às 09:11
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
3.134
Forks
647

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos
3 arquivos

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
review-pr
description
Use when asked to review a GitHub pull request, PR link is shared, or user says /review-pr
# Review GitHub Pull Request Review the GitHub pull request: $ARGUMENTS. This is a read-only review. Report findings in the console — never post comments, approve, or request changes on GitHub, and never modify the code under review. ## Steps 1. `gh pr view` for the PR details and description. 2. Create a git worktree and do everything below inside it, so the reviewer's checked-out branch stays untouched (`git worktree add --detach <path>`). 3. `gh pr checkout` in the worktree, then confirm the local commit hash matches the remote PR head. - **HARD STOP**: if the checkout fails, or the hashes still differ afterwards, stop and report it. No workarounds — not `git fetch`, not reviewing from the diff alone. Wait for instructions. 4. `gh pr checks` for CI status. 5. `gh pr diff` for the changes, then read the surrounding code for anything the diff alone can't settle. 6. Apply `REVIEW_STANDARDS.md`, in the same directory as this skill. Running tests or linters isn't part of this — CI does that. ## Output Format Comments per file and line that need attention. Skip what's already fine. Each comment carries a severity (`[CRITICAL]`, `[PROBLEM]`, `[SUGGESTION]`), states the problem in a sentence, says why it matters when that isn't self-evident, and gives a concrete fix or snippet. Close with an overall assessment — `approve`, `request changes`, or `comment` — followed by the findings grouped by severity.
Ver no GitHub