Skip to main content

aqua-evaluation

Evaluate LLM model quality using BERTScore, ROUGE, Perplexity, and Text Readability metrics on OCI AI Quick Actions (AQUA). Covers dataset preparation, evaluation job creation, and report interpretation. Triggered when user wants to evaluate or benchmark a model.

Informações da origem

Repositório
oracle/accelerated-data-science
Última atividade na origem
28 de fevereiro de 2026 às 16:13
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
125
Forks
68

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos
3 arquivos

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
aqua-evaluation
description
Evaluate LLM model quality using BERTScore, ROUGE, Perplexity, and Text Readability metrics on OCI AI Quick Actions (AQUA). Covers dataset preparation, evaluation job creation, and report interpretation. Triggered when user wants to evaluate or benchmark a model.
user-invocable
true
disable-model-invocation
false
# AQUA Model Evaluation Use this skill when the user wants to evaluate LLM models on OCI Data Science using AI Quick Actions. ## Supported Metrics | Metric | Description | Best For | |---|---|---| | **BERTScore** | Embedding-based semantic similarity (precision, recall, F1) | General text quality, aligns well with human judgement | | **ROUGE** | N-gram overlap between generated and reference text | Summarization tasks | | **Perplexity** | How well the model predicts the text | Language modeling quality | | **Text Readability** | Reading level / complexity of generated text | Content accessibility | ## Dataset Format JSONL format with required `prompt` and `completion` keys, optional `category`: ```jsonl {"prompt": "Summarize this dialog:\nAmanda: I baked cookies...", "completion": "Amanda baked cookies and will bring some for Jerry tomorrow."} {"prompt": "Translate to French: Hello world", "completion": "Bonjour le monde", "category": "translation"} {"prompt": "What is 2+2?", "completion": "4", "category": "math"} ``` The `category` field dimensions evaluation metrics in the report (e.g., see accuracy per category). When omitted, defaults to `"_"` (unknown). Official sample datasets (10 prompts each, math + logic categories): | File | Use Case | |---|---| | `examples/evaluation-sample-no-sys-message.jsonl` | Llama-style prompts without system message | | `examples/evaluation-sample-with-sys-message.jsonl` | Llama-style prompts with `<<SYS>>` system message | ## Python SDK Usage ### Import ```python from ads.aqua.evaluation import AquaEvaluationApp eval_app = AquaEvaluationApp() ``` ### Create Evaluation ```python from ads.aqua.evaluation.entities import CreateAquaEvaluationDetails details = CreateAquaEvaluationDetails( evaluation_source_id="ocid1.datasciencemodeldeployment.oc1.iad.xxx", # Deployment OCID evaluation_name="llama-3.1-8b-eval-bertscore", dataset_path="oci://my-bucket@my-namespace/datasets/eval_data.jsonl", report_path="oci://my-bucket@my-namespace/eval-reports/", model_parameters={ "max_tokens": 500, "temperature": 0.7, "top_p": 0.9, }, shape_name="VM.Standard.E4.Flex", block_storage_size=50, compartment_id="ocid1.compartment.oc1..xxx", project_id="ocid1.datascienceproject.oc1.iad.xxx", log_group_id="ocid1.loggroup.oc1.iad.xxx", log_id="ocid1.log.oc1.iad.xxx", metrics=[ {"name": "bertscore"}, {"name": "rouge"}, ], ) evaluation = eval_app.create(create_evaluation_details=details) print(f"Evaluation: {evaluation.id} | State: {evaluation.lifecycle_state}") ``` ### Evaluate a Model (not deployment) Directly You can pass a model OCID instead of a deployment OCID: ```python details = CreateAquaEvaluationDetails( evaluation_source_id="ocid1.datasciencemodel.oc1.iad.xxx", # Model OCID # ... rest of params same as above ) ``` ### Evaluate Stacked/Multi-Model Deployment For stacked or multi-model deployments, specify which model to evaluate: ```python details = CreateAquaEvaluationDetails( evaluation_source_id="ocid1.datasciencemodeldeployment.oc1.iad.xxx", model_parameters={ "max_tokens": 500, "temperature": 0.7, "model": "llama-3.1-8b-customer-support", # Target specific model in deployment }, # ... rest of params ) ``` ### With Experiment Tracking ```python details = CreateAquaEvaluationDetails( evaluation_source_id="ocid1.datasciencemodeldeployment.oc1.iad.xxx", evaluation_name="llama-eval-v2", dataset_path="oci://my-bucket@my-namespace/datasets/eval_data.jsonl", report_path="oci://my-bucket@my-namespace/eval-reports/", model_parameters={"max_tokens": 500, "temperature": 0.7}, shape_name="VM.Standard.E4.Flex", block_storage_size=50, experiment_name="llama-evaluations", # Groups evaluations together experiment_description="Llama 3.1 evaluation experiments", metrics=[{"name": "bertscore"}, {"name": "rouge"}], ) ``` ### List Evaluations ```python evaluations = eval_app.list(compartment_id="ocid1.compartment.oc1..xxx") for e in evaluations: print(f"{e.display_name} | {e.lifecycle_state}") ``` ### Get Evaluation Details ```python evaluation = eval_app.get(eval_id="ocid1.datasciencemodel.oc1.iad.xxx") ``` ## CLI Usage ### Create Evaluation ```bash ads aqua evaluation create \ --evaluation_source_id "ocid1.datasciencemodeldeployment.oc1.iad.xxx" \ --evaluation_name "llama-eval-bertscore" \ --dataset_path "oci://my-bucket@my-namespace/datasets/eval_data.jsonl" \ --report_path "oci://my-bucket@my-namespace/eval-reports/" \ --model_parameters '{"max_tokens": 500, "temperature": 0.7}' \ --shape_name "VM.Standard.E4.Flex" \ --block_storage_size 50 \ --compartment_id "ocid1.compartment.oc1..xxx" \ --project_id "ocid1.datascienceproject.oc1.iad.xxx" \ --metrics '[{"name": "bertscore"}, {"name": "rouge"}]' ``` ### List / Get Evaluations ```bash ads aqua evaluation list --compartment_id "ocid1.compartment.oc1..xxx" ads aqua evaluation get --eval_id "ocid1.datasciencemodel.oc1.iad.xxx" ``` ## Interpreting Results ### BERTScore The evaluation produces a Model Catalog entry with: - **Precision**: How much of the generated text is semantically represented in the reference - **Recall**: How much of the reference text is captured by the generated text - **F1**: Harmonic mean of precision and recall Higher scores = better quality. Scores clustered around the mean indicate consistent performance. ### ROUGE - **ROUGE-1**: Unigram overlap - **ROUGE-2**: Bigram overlap - **ROUGE-L**: Longest common subsequence ### BERTScore Limitations - May favor models mirroring its own architecture - Lacks consideration for sentence-level syntax - Diminished effectiveness for context beyond word-level (idioms, cultural nuances) - Not suitable for evaluating coding models on programming tasks ## Key Source Files - `ads/aqua/evaluation/evaluation.py` — `AquaEvaluationApp` (create, list, get, load_metrics) - `ads/aqua/evaluation/entities.py` — `CreateAquaEvaluationDetails`, `AquaEvalMetrics` - `ads/aqua/config/evaluation/evaluation_service_config.py` — Metric configuration
Ver no GitHub