ai-science-splicing-models

name	ai-science-splicing-models
description	Score splicing variant effects with SpliceAI/Pangolin delta scores (DS_AG/DS_AL/DS_DG/DS_DL) and AlphaGenome. Use when scoring a VCF for splice disruption, interpreting DS thresholds, or ranking cryptic splice-site variants.
tool_type	python
primary_tool	spliceai

Splicing Models: SpliceAI and AlphaGenome

When to Use

• Scoring a VCF of candidate SNVs/indels for splice-disrupting potential (rare disease, exome/genome triage)
• Interpreting or thresholding SpliceAI delta scores (DS_AG, DS_AL, DS_DG, DS_DL) for clinical flagging
• Deciding between SpliceAI, Pangolin (tissue-specific splicing), or AlphaGenome (multi-modal: expression + chromatin + contact + splicing)
• Prioritizing a shortlist of variants by combining splice deltas with expression/chromatin evidence
• Explaining why a variant creates a cryptic donor/acceptor site rather than just weakening a canonical one

Version Compatibility

• spliceai ≥1.3.1 (Illumina), requires TensorFlow ≥2.x, Python 3.8–3.10 per upstream pins
• pangolin ≥1.0.5 (tissue-specific splicing predictor, same input contract as SpliceAI)
• pysam ≥0.22 for VCF iteration; reference build must match training genome (GRCh37 or GRCh38)
• AlphaGenome: accessed via Google DeepMind's hosted API/research repo (no local weights as of 2026)

Prerequisites

• pip install spliceai tensorflow pysam (SpliceAI ships its own Keras models; first run downloads ~200MB of weights)
• A reference FASTA (indexed with .fai) and a gene annotation (grch37/grch38 built-in, or custom GTF-derived annotation file)
• Familiarity with VCF format (see bio-applied-variant-calling-and-snp-analysis) and GT/AG splice-site biology

Splice Signal Refresher

• Donor (5' splice site): exon–intron boundary, canonical dinucleotide GT
• Acceptor (3' splice site): intron–exon boundary, canonical dinucleotide AG
• Delta scores range 0–1: ≥0.2 is a common clinical-flagging threshold, ≥0.8 is high confidence
• Gain scores (DS_DG/DS_AG) mean the variant creates a new site — harder to interpret than losses, since you must evaluate the resulting exon/intron structure

Run real SpliceAI on a VCF

Goal: Get production delta scores for variants in a VCF using the actual SpliceAI model (not a toy heuristic). Approach: Use the spliceai CLI for batch scoring, or the Annotator/get_delta_scores Python API for programmatic control per-record.

## CLI: annotate a VCF, writing SpliceAI INFO fields (ALLELE|SYMBOL|DS_AG|DS_AL|DS_DG|DS_DL|DP_AG|DP_AL|DP_DG|DP_DL)
spliceai -I input.vcf -O output.vcf -R hg38.fa -A grch38 -D 500 -M 1

import pysam
from spliceai.utils import Annotator, get_delta_scores

def annotate_vcf(vcf_path: str, fasta_path: str, annotation: str = "grch38", dist: int = 500):
    """Yield (record, [delta_score_str, ...]) for each variant in a VCF.

    delta_score_str fields are '|'-delimited: ALLELE|SYMBOL|DS_AG|DS_AL|DS_DG|DS_DL|DP_AG|DP_AL|DP_DG|DP_DL
    """
    ann = Annotator(fasta_path, annotation)
    for record in pysam.VariantFile(vcf_path):
        scores = get_delta_scores(record, ann, dist, mask=0)
        yield record, scores

for record, scores in annotate_vcf("input.vcf", "hg38.fa"):
    print(record.chrom, record.pos, record.ref, record.alts, scores)

Toy delta-score model (build intuition before trusting the real network)

Goal: Understand what a delta score measures — the change in donor/acceptor "site-ness" caused by a single-base substitution. Approach: Score a small window around a variant with a crude motif+GC heuristic, comparing reference vs. mutant windows. This is pedagogical only; use the real spliceai/pangolin models for anything clinical.

def donor_score(window: str) -> float:
    """Toy donor-site score: rewards a GT dinucleotide at the window center, plus G-richness."""
    center = window[len(window) // 2 - 1: len(window) // 2 + 1]
    score = 0.7 if center == "GT" else 0.1
    score += 0.03 * window.count("G")
    return min(score, 1.0)

def acceptor_score(window: str) -> float:
    """Toy acceptor-site score: rewards an AG dinucleotide at the window center, plus T-richness."""
    center = window[len(window) // 2 - 1: len(window) // 2 + 1]
    score = 0.7 if center == "AG" else 0.1
    score += 0.02 * window.count("T")
    return min(score, 1.0)

def mutate(seq: str, pos: int, alt: str) -> str:
    """Return seq with the base at pos replaced by alt."""
     seq[:pos] + alt + seq[pos + :]

 () -> :
    
    half = w // 
    start, end = (, pos - half), ((seq), pos + half + )
    ref_window = seq[start:end]
    alt_window = mutate(seq, pos, alt)[start:end]

    d_ref, d_alt = donor_score(ref_window), donor_score(alt_window)
    a_ref, a_alt = acceptor_score(ref_window), acceptor_score(alt_window)
     {
        : (, d_alt - d_ref),
        : (, d_ref - d_alt),
        : (, a_alt - a_ref),
        : (, a_ref - a_alt),
    }

example = 
 alt  :
     alt != example[]:
        (example[], , alt, splice_deltas(example, , alt))

Rank and integrate candidate variants

Goal: Turn per-variant delta scores into a prioritized shortlist, optionally combined with expression/chromatin evidence (AlphaGenome-style multi-task output). Approach: Sort by max(DS_*) as a first-pass filter, then blend with other modalities using a weighted score.

def rank_by_max_delta(example: str, candidates: list) -> list:
    """Rank (pos, alt) candidates by their maximum splice delta score, descending."""
    ranked = []
    for p, alt in candidates:
        if alt == example[p]:
            continue
        ds = splice_deltas(example, p, alt)
        ranked.append((p, example[p], alt, max(ds.values()), ds))
    ranked.sort(key=lambda x: x[3], reverse=True)
    return ranked

def integrated_priority(max_ds: float, expr_delta: float, chrom_delta: float) -> float:
    """Weighted blend of splice, expression, and chromatin deltas (AlphaGenome-style triage)."""
    return 0.6 * max_ds + 0.25 * abs(expr_delta) + 0.15 * abs(chrom_delta)

candidates = [(8, "A"), (8, "C"), (9, "A"), (10, "T"), (14, "G"), (17, "A")]
for pos, ref, alt, max_ds, ds in rank_by_max_delta(example, candidates):
    print(f"pos={pos} {ref}>{alt} maxDS= details=")

Pitfalls

• Toy code ≠ SpliceAI: the illustrative donor_score/acceptor_score functions are for intuition only — they will not match real SpliceAI/Pangolin output; always use the real model for actual variant interpretation.
• Reference build mismatch: SpliceAI predictions depend on the annotation (grch37/grch38) matching the FASTA build — mixing builds silently produces wrong gene contexts.
• Coordinate systems: BED is 0-based half-open; VCF/GFF are 1-based inclusive — mixing them causes off-by-one errors in window extraction.
• Gain vs loss asymmetry: DS_DG/DS_AG (gain) require checking the resulting exon/intron structure — a high gain score without a plausible new transcript is often a false positive.
• Multiple testing: apply FDR correction (Benjamini-Hochberg) when scoring thousands of variants and thresholding for significance.

See Also

• bio-applied-variant-calling-and-snp-analysis — VCF structure, calling, and iteration with pysam/cyvcf2
• bio-applied-clinical-genomics — downstream clinical triage of prioritized variants
• ai-science-enformer-regulatory — related sequence-to-function model (Enformer/Borzoi) for regulatory and expression tracks
• ai-science-variant-to-structure-models — complementary variant-effect prediction at the protein-structure level