bio-clinical-databases-msi-detection

name	bio-clinical-databases-msi-detection
description	Calls microsatellite instability from WES/WGS/targeted-panel with MSIsensor, MSIsensor-pro, MSIsensor-ct (panel-aware), mSINGS, and MANTIS for FDA pembrolizumab MSI-H pan-tumor / Lynch syndrome / dMMR ICI biomarker. Use when stratifying ICI eligibility (Le 2015), pairing MSI with TMB-H (Sha 2020 / Salem 2018), screening Lynch syndrome (universal IHC + MSI), or distinguishing MSI-H tumors from POLE-exo hypermutator with overlapping signatures.
origin	openai4s
category	bioskills/clinical-databases
metadata	{"tool_type":"cli","primary_tool":"MSIsensor-pro","third_party":{"name":"GPTomics/bioSkills","repository":"https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills","commit":"d91ed3d563019e649dc854c56ccd62551359488a","license":"MIT"}}

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: MSIsensor-pro 1.2+, MSIsensor 0.6+, MANTIS 1.0.5+, samtools 1.19+, mSINGS 5.6+, pandas 2.2+, cyvcf2 0.30+. FDA pembrolizumab MSI-H / dMMR pan-tumor approval is from 2017 (Le 2015 NEJM; KEYNOTE-016/164/158); approval extended to colorectal first-line in 2020.

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

• Python: pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures
• CLI: <tool> --version

If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying. MSIsensor-pro replaces MSIsensor for tumor-only assays; MSIsensor-ct is the bTMB-equivalent for ctDNA panels.

MSI Detection; The Companion ICI Biomarker to TMB

'Detect MSI status from this somatic sequencing data' -> Profile microsatellite instability across canonical loci (Bethesda 5 panel + extended NGS-derived sites); classify MSI-H / MSS / MSI-L per Bethesda / FDA / KEYNOTE convention.

• CLI (recommended tumor-only): msisensor-pro msi -d microsatellites.list -t tumor.bam -o msi_out -b 16
• CLI (paired tumor-normal): msisensor msi -d microsatellites.list -n normal.bam -t tumor.bam -o msi_out
• CLI (ctDNA / blood MSI): msisensor-ct ...
• CLI (older WES standard): mantis -t tumor.bam -n normal.bam -b targets.bed --threads 8

The Regulatory and Trial Landscape

Event	Year	Threshold	Notes
Le 2015 NEJM	2015	MSI-H + ICI in CRC	The seminal paper: pembrolizumab in MSI-H CRC ORR 40% vs 0% MSS
FDA pembrolizumab MSI-H / dMMR pan-tumor	2017	MSI-H	First tissue-agnostic FDA approval (KEYNOTE-016/164/158)
FDA pembrolizumab first-line MSI-H CRC	2020	MSI-H + first-line CRC	KEYNOTE-177
CheckMate 142	2017-2018	MSI-H + nivolumab/ipilimumab	Pan-tumor MSI-H second-line
ESMO 2024	2024	MSI-H	Maintained pan-tumor MSI-H biomarker
Universal Lynch screening	--	IHC + MSI on all CRC <= 70 yr	NCCN / ACG / EGAPP guidelines

MSI vs dMMR vs TMB-H: The Conceptual Hierarchy

Term	Definition	Method	Relationship
dMMR (deficient MMR)	Loss of MMR protein function	IHC (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2)	Causes MSI
MSI-H	Microsatellite instability high	PCR-based Bethesda or NGS	Consequence of dMMR
Lynch syndrome	Germline MMR mutation	Germline sequencing	Causes ~50% of MSI-H CRC; rest are sporadic (MLH1 hyper-methylation)
TMB-H	>= 10 mut/Mb	NGS panel / WES	Statistical correlate of MSI-H
POLE-exo hypermutator	POLE proofreading defect	Sequencing / signatures	Hypermutator WITHOUT MMR-D; MSI-stable typically

MSI-H + TMB-H overlap (Chalmers 2017 Genome Med 9:34):

• ~83% of MSI-H tumors are TMB-H.
• ~16% of TMB-H solid tumors are MSI-H.
• Sha 2020 Cancer Discov: MSI-H is the more established dMMR biomarker for ICI decisions; TMB-H not additive.

POLE-exo vs MMR-D:

• POLE-exo (SBS10a/10b): hypermutator (100-300 mut/Mb pure); typically MSI-stable.
• MMR-D (SBS6/15/26/44 + ID1/2): 30-50 mut/Mb typical; MSI-H.
• POLE-exo + MMR-D (SBS14 + SBS20): ultra-hypermutator >=500 mut/Mb; MSI-H.

Tool Taxonomy

Tool	Paired	Tumor-only	ctDNA	Algorithm	Fails when
MSIsensor (Niu 2014 Bioinformatics)	Yes	No	No	Bayesian + read-length distribution	Tumor-only data (no baseline); cohort baseline missing
MSIsensor-pro (Jia 2020 Genom Proteom Bioinform)	Optional	Yes	No	Distribution comparison to baseline	Baseline cohort not provided; panel < 50 loci
MSIsensor-ct (Han 2021 Brief Bioinform)	--	--	Yes	cfDNA-aware	Tumor fraction < 3%; low ctDNA shed
MANTIS (Kautto 2017 Oncotarget)	Yes	No	No	Step-wise difference	Tumor-only; low coverage at microsatellites
mSINGS (Salipante 2014 Clin Chem)	--	Yes	No	Background panel (unstable-loci fraction)	Background panel poorly characterized for cohort

Operational consensus 2024-2026:

• Tumor + paired normal WES: MSIsensor or MANTIS.
• Tumor-only assay (commercial panels, often unpaired): MSIsensor-pro with reference baseline.
• ctDNA / liquid biopsy: MSIsensor-ct.
• Lynch screening: IHC FIRST (rules out 90%+); MSI-PCR / NGS confirmatory.

Decision Tree by Scenario

Scenario	Recommended path	Why
Tumor + paired normal WES	MSIsensor (standard)	Reference paired-normal comparison
Tumor-only WES/panel	MSIsensor-pro with panel baseline	No matched normal needed
ctDNA / liquid biopsy	MSIsensor-ct	cfDNA-aware
Lynch syndrome screening	Universal IHC + MSI (NCCN)	IHC catches 90%+; MSI for IHC-equivocal
FDA pembrolizumab eligibility	Validate per FoCR PCR + IHC + NGS concordance	Cross-platform required
MSI-H + TMB-H concurrence	MSI-H is primary biomarker	Sha 2020; TMB-H not additive
POLE+MMR ultra-hypermutator	Sigprofiler signatures (SBS14, SBS20)	Mechanism beyond MSI alone
Sporadic MSI-H	Confirm MLH1 hypermethylation; rule out Lynch	Distinguishes sporadic vs germline
MSI-stable + TMB-H	Investigate POLE-exo signature (SBS10a/10b)	POLE-exo causes hypermutator without MSI
Pan-tumor screening	MSI + IHC + TMB combined	Multiple modalities for ICI eligibility

Bethesda Panel and Modern NGS-Derived Loci

The original NCI/Bethesda reference panel (Boland 1998) used BAT-25 and BAT-26 plus three dinucleotide markers (D2S123, D5S346, D17S250); >= 2 of 5 loci unstable -> MSI-H. Modern PCR assays use the mononucleotide pentaplex (the current clinical standard), which replaced the dinucleotide markers for improved cross-population specificity:

• BAT-25 (chr4)
• BAT-26 (chr2)
• NR-21 (chr14)
• NR-24 (chr2)
• MONO-27 (chr2)

NGS-based MSI panels use 50-1000+ microsatellite loci. MSI-H requires unstable status at >=40% of tested loci typically (varies by panel calibration).

Standard Workflow: MSIsensor-pro Tumor-Only

Goal: Compute MSI status from tumor-only WES/panel.

Approach: Generate baseline from population reference; compare patient tumor.

# Generate microsatellite list from reference genome (one-time)
msisensor-pro scan -d /reference/GRCh38.fa -o microsatellites.list -p 1 -m 5

# Generate baseline from N normal control samples (one-time per panel)
msisensor-pro baseline -d microsatellites.list -i normal_samples.list -o baseline.list -b 16

# Score tumor sample. The `-i sample_id` flag is uncommon: in typical msisensor-pro
# usage the sample identifier is derived from the BAM file -- verify the flag set
# against `msisensor-pro pro --help` for the installed release.
msisensor-pro pro \
    -d microsatellites.list \
    -t tumor.bam \
    -o msi_output \
    -b 16 \
    --baseline baseline.list

# Output: msi_output_all (raw); msi_output_unstable (unstable loci); msi_output.txt (summary)
# Critical column: %_unstable. Threshold MSI-H typically >= 20-30% depending on panel.

Paired Tumor-Normal MSIsensor

msisensor msi \
    -d microsatellites.list \
    -n normal.bam \
    -t tumor.bam \
    -o msi_paired_out \
    -b 16

# Output: %_unstable in paired comparison
# MSI-H threshold: >= 20% by FoCR guidance; varies 10-30% across studies

MANTIS Step-wise Difference

mantis.py \
    -t tumor.bam \
    -n normal.bam \
    -b microsatellite_targets.bed \
    --threads 8 \
    -o mantis_output

# Output: mantis_output.kmer_counts (raw), mantis_output (status)
# Threshold MSI-H: stepwise difference > 0.4 (default)

MSI-H Classification Logic

import pandas as pd


def classify_msi(unstable_percentage, panel_calibrated_cutoff=20.0):
    '''Classify MSI status from percentage of unstable loci.

    Bethesda PCR: >=2 of 5 unstable -> MSI-H (40% loci)
    NGS: panel-specific cutoffs typically 10-30%
    Concordance: MSI-PCR + IHC + NGS should agree (FoCR)
    '''
    if unstable_percentage >= panel_calibrated_cutoff:
        return 'MSI-H'
    elif unstable_percentage >= panel_calibrated_cutoff / 2:
        return 'MSI-L (intermediate; treat as MSS clinically per FDA)'
    else:
        return 'MSS'


def msi_lynch_workflow(msi_status, ihc_results, mlh1_methylation_status, germline_test):
    '''Standard Lynch syndrome workflow.

    Args:
        msi_status: 'MSI-H' / 'MSS' / 'MSI-L'
        ihc_results: dict {MLH1: 'retained' or 'loss', MSH2, MSH6, PMS2}
        mlh1_methylation_status: 'methylated' (sporadic) / 'unmethylated' (Lynch suspect)
        germline_test: 'positive' / 'negative' / 'not_performed'
    '''
    if msi_status != 'MSI-H':
        return 'No further Lynch screening indicated'

    ihc_loss = [gene for gene, status in ihc_results.items() if status == 'loss']
    if not ihc_loss:
        return 'MSI-H with retained IHC; consider Lynch with germline testing'

    if 'MLH1' in ihc_loss:
        if mlh1_methylation_status == 'methylated':
             
         mlh1_methylation_status == :
             
        :
             

     


 ():
    
    msi_high = msi_status == 
    dmmr_positive = dmmr_ihc == 
    tmb_h = tmb_value >= 

     msi_high  dmmr_positive:
         (
                )
     tmb_h  tumor_type  tumor_type.lower()  (, , ):
         (
                )
     tmb_h:
         
     

Per-Operation Failure Modes

1. Tumor-only with paired-normal tool

• Trigger: Run MSIsensor on tumor-only BAM.
• Mechanism: MSIsensor requires paired normal for baseline comparison.
• Symptom: Tool errors or produces unstable noisy result.
• Fix: Use MSIsensor-pro for tumor-only; or use mSINGS background-panel approach.

2. Panel size too small

• Trigger: 30-locus panel called MSI-H based on 20% threshold (= 6 unstable loci).
• Mechanism: Small panel + stochastic unstable rates produce high false-positive rates.
• Symptom: False-positive MSI-H in WES-comparable panels with < 50 microsatellite loci.
• Fix: Validate panel calibration with reference cohort; use panel-specific cutoff; minimum 50 informative loci.

3. IHC vs MSI discordance not investigated

• Trigger: IHC retains all four MMR proteins; MSI-H by sequencing.
• Mechanism: IHC may miss subtle loss; MSI may include MSH6-only subtype (more variable); rare germline POLE+MMR ultra-hypermutators show MSI.
• Symptom: Apparent discordance; classification ambiguous.
• Fix: Cross-check with germline MMR sequencing; check for POLE-exo on Sigprofiler.

4. MSI-H + Lynch syndrome confusion

• Trigger: Report MSI-H tumor as "Lynch syndrome".
• Mechanism: ~50% of MSI-H CRC is sporadic (MLH1 hypermethylation, not germline Lynch).
• Symptom: Incorrect family counseling; wrong screening.
• Fix: Apply IHC + MLH1 methylation + germline testing workflow.

5. POLE-exo hypermutator labeled MSI

• Trigger: Tumor with 200 mut/Mb POLE-exo signature labeled MSI-H.
• Mechanism: Pure POLE-exo causes hypermutator WITHOUT MSI (different repair mechanism); apparent MSI-H call may be a false positive in high-mutation context.
• Symptom: Misclassification; ICI eligibility still positive but for different mechanism.
• Fix: Run Sigprofiler signatures (SBS10a/10b vs SBS6/15/26/44); confirm POLE-exo via SBS10 contribution.

6. ctDNA MSI without sufficient tumor fraction

• Trigger: Run MSIsensor-ct on cfDNA with <1% tumor fraction.
• Mechanism: Low ctDNA fraction produces noise-dominated unstable locus counts.
• Symptom: False-negative or unstable MSI call.
• Fix: Estimate tumor fraction first (ichorCNA); require >= 3% for reliable cfDNA MSI.

7. Universal screening missed

• Trigger: CRC patient < 70 yr without IHC / MSI.
• Mechanism: NCCN / ACG universal Lynch screening required; without it, Lynch syndrome undiagnosed.
• Symptom: Family loses screening benefit.
• Fix: Universal IHC + MSI on all CRC < 70; institute reflex testing.

8. MSI-L treated as actionable

• Trigger: Report MSI-L (intermediate) as ICI-eligible.
• Mechanism: FDA approval specifies MSI-H; MSI-L = MSS clinically.
• Symptom: ICI given on insufficient indication; reimbursement issues.
• Fix: Apply MSI-H threshold strictly per FDA; MSI-L = MSS.

Reconciliation: When Sources Disagree

Pattern	Likely cause	Action
PCR Bethesda MSI-H vs NGS MSS	Bethesda panel uses 5 loci only; less sensitive	Trust NGS with >=50 informative loci
NGS MSI-H vs IHC retained	Subtle MMR loss; MSH6-only subtype; or POLE-exo	Confirm with germline + POLE-exo signature analysis
Paired-normal MSI-H + tumor-only MSS	Sample swap or low tumor purity in tumor-only	Re-validate; check purity (>=20% required)
MSIsensor-pro vs MSIsensor (paired)	Different baseline thresholds	Apply panel-specific calibration
MSI-H suspected but tools differ	Borderline mutational burden	Use signature analysis (SBS6/15/26/44) as orthogonal evidence
ctDNA MSI vs tissue MSI	Tumor fraction low	Trust tissue; estimate ctDNA fraction

Quantitative Thresholds and Conventions

Threshold	Convention	Source
Bethesda MSI-H	>= 2/5 unstable	Boland 1998
NGS MSI-H cutoff	10-30% unstable loci (panel-specific)	Various
MANTIS MSI-H threshold	Step-wise difference > 0.4	Kautto 2017
MSIsensor MSI-H threshold	>= 20% by FoCR	Friends of Cancer Research
Minimum informative loci	>= 50 NGS loci	Panel-design convention
ctDNA tumor fraction minimum	>= 3% for reliable cfDNA MSI (depth-dependent operational floor; MSIsensor-ct reports 0.05% LOD only at >= 3000x)	Operational convention
Tumor purity minimum	>= 20%	Standard
FDA approval	MSI-H or dMMR pan-tumor (2017)	KEYNOTE-016/164/158
First-line MSI-H CRC	KEYNOTE-177 (2020)	--
MSI-H -> TMB-H rate	~83%	Chalmers 2017
TMB-H -> MSI-H rate	~16%	Chalmers 2017
Sporadic MSI-H mechanism	~50% MLH1 hypermethylation	Various
Universal screening cutoff	CRC <= 70 yr	NCCN / ACG

Common Errors

Symptom	Cause	Solution
MSI-H + IHC retained discordance	Subtle loss; MSH6-only; or rare hypermutator	Cross-check germline + signatures
Borderline MSI call	Panel too small	Use >= 50 informative loci
Tumor-only MSI low confidence	Background subtraction needed	Use MSIsensor-pro with cohort baseline
MSI-H + TMB-H reported additive	Tautology per Sha 2020	MSI-H is primary; TMB-H not additive
POLE-exo labeled MMR-D	Different mechanism; mutation count differs	Run Sigprofiler; SBS10a/10b is POLE-exo
Sporadic MSI-H mis-labeled Lynch	Need MLH1 methylation test	Confirm MLH1 methylation + germline

Anticipated Reviewer Pushback

Pushback	Standard response
"MSI-H + TMB-H both reported additive"	Sha 2020 Cancer Discov: MSI-H is the primary biomarker; TMB-H is statistical correlate. We report MSI-H first; TMB-H reported but noted not additive.
"Why MSIsensor-pro instead of MSIsensor?"	MSIsensor requires paired normal; MSIsensor-pro handles tumor-only via cohort baseline. Most commercial panels are tumor-only.
"MSI-PCR vs NGS discordant"	Bethesda 5-locus panel is less sensitive; we use NGS >=50 informative loci for confirmation.
"Universal Lynch screening?"	NCCN / ACG recommend reflex IHC + MSI on all CRC <= 70 yr; we implemented universal screening protocol.
"POLE-exo hypermutator with MSI-H?"	Sigprofiler signature analysis distinguishes: SBS10a/10b = POLE-exo (typically MSI-stable); SBS6/15/26/44 = MMR-D. POLE+MMR concurrent produces ultra-hypermutator.
"MSI-L?"	FDA approval specifies MSI-H; MSI-L = clinically MSS; we apply MSI-H threshold strictly.
"ctDNA MSI viability?"	MSIsensor-ct works if tumor fraction >= 3%; we estimate via ichorCNA; below threshold falls back to tissue.

References

• Le DT et al. 2015. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. NEJM 372:2509. (The seminal paper)
• Marabelle A et al. 2020. Efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with noncolorectal high MSI/dMMR cancer. J Clin Oncol 38:1.
• Niu B et al. 2014. MSIsensor: microsatellite instability detection using paired tumor-normal sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:1015.
• Jia P et al. 2020. MSIsensor-pro: fast, accurate, and matched-normal-sample-free detection of microsatellite instability. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 18:65.
• Han X et al. 2021. MSIsensor-ct: microsatellite instability detection using cfDNA sequencing data. Brief Bioinform 22:bbaa402.
• Kautto EA et al. 2017. Performance evaluation for rapid detection of pan-cancer microsatellite instability with MANTIS. Oncotarget 8:7452.
• Salipante SJ et al. 2014. Microsatellite instability detection by NGS. Clin Chem 60:1192.
• Boland CR et al. 1998. National Cancer Institute workshop on microsatellite instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition. Cancer Res 58:5248.
• Salem ME et al. 2018. Landscape of tumor mutation load, mismatch repair deficiency, and PD-L1 expression in a large patient cohort of gastrointestinal cancers. Mol Cancer Res 16:805.
• Chalmers ZR et al. 2017. Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden. Genome Med 9:34.
• Sha D et al. 2020. Tumor mutational burden as a predictive biomarker in solid tumors. Cancer Discov 10:1808.
• Vanderwalde A et al. 2018. Microsatellite instability status determined by next-generation sequencing and compared with PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden in 11,348 patients. Cancer Med 7:746.

Related Skills

• clinical-databases/tumor-mutational-burden - TMB as related ICI biomarker
• clinical-databases/somatic-signatures - SBS6/15/26/44 MMR-D signatures + SBS10a/10b POLE-exo
• clinical-databases/clinvar-lookup - Lynch syndrome variant pathogenicity (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2)
• clinical-databases/variant-prioritization - Germline MMR variant prioritization for Lynch
• variant-calling/clinical-interpretation - Clinical reporting