Skip to main content

plan

Break down medium-to-large tasks into phased plans in brain/plans/. Planning only — does not implement. Use for new features, multi-file refactors, or architectural changes — not small fixes. Triggers: "plan this", "break this down".

Ir para a instalação

Informações da origem

Repositório
poteto/brainmaxxing
Última atividade na origem
27 de fevereiro de 2026 às 19:40
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
291
Forks
7

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
plan
description
Break down medium-to-large tasks into phased plans in brain/plans/. Planning only — does not implement. Use for new features, multi-file refactors, or architectural changes — not small fixes. Triggers: "plan this", "break this down".
# Plan Produce implementation plans grounded in project principles. Write plans to `brain/plans/`. **Do NOT implement anything — the plan is the deliverable.** **Use Tasks to track progress.** Create a task for each step (TaskCreate), mark each in_progress when starting and completed when done (TaskUpdate). Check TaskList after completing each step. ## Step 0 — Triage Complexity Before running the full planning workflow, assess whether this task actually needs a plan: **Trivially small (1–2 files, obvious approach):** Tell the user this task doesn't need a plan and suggest implementing directly without the plan skill. **Stop here — do not implement.** **Needs planning (proceed to Step 1):** - The change spans 3+ files or introduces new architecture - There are multiple valid approaches and the user should weigh in - The task has unclear scope or cross-cutting concerns - The user explicitly asks for a plan ## Step 1 — Load Principles Read `brain/principles.md`. Follow every `[[wikilink]]` and read each linked principle file. These principles govern all plan decisions — refer back to them throughout. **Do NOT skip this. Do NOT use memorized principle content — always read fresh.** ## Step 2 — Define Scope and Constraints Use `AskUserQuestion` to resolve ambiguity before exploring the codebase: - What is in scope vs explicitly out of scope? - Are there constraints (dependencies, platform requirements, existing patterns to preserve)? - What does "done" look like? Frame questions with concrete options. If the request is already clear, confirm scope boundaries briefly and move on. ## Step 3 — Explore Context with Subagents **Always** delegate exploration to subagents via the `Task` tool. Never do large-scale codebase exploration in the main context. Spawn exploration agents (subagent_type: `Explore`) to: - Read existing code in affected areas - Identify patterns, conventions, and dependencies - Map architecture relevant to the change - Find tests, types, and related infrastructure Run multiple agents in parallel when investigating independent areas. ## Step 4 — Gather Domain Skills Check installed skills (`.agents/skills/`, `.claude/skills/`) for any that match the plan's domain. **Invoke matched skills** — read their output and incorporate domain guidance into the plan. If the plan touches a domain **not covered** by installed skills, use `find-skills` to search for a relevant skill. If one is found, install it (project-local) and incorporate its guidance. Note what was installed so the user can see it. After the plan is written, delete any one-off skills that won't be needed again. ## Step 5 — Write the Plan Create the plan directory and files manually: 1. Create `brain/plans/NN-slug-name/overview.md` (or a single file for simple plans) 2. Create phase files as needed 3. Update `brain/plans/index.md` with a link to the new plan ### Phase sizing - **1 function/type + tests** per phase, or **1 bug fix** — not "one file" or "one component" (too variable) - **Max 2-3 files touched** per phase when possible - **Prefer 8-10 small phases** over 3-4 large ones — small phases keep future options open - If a phase lists >5 test cases or >3 functions, split it For small plans, a single file at `brain/plans/NN-plan-name.md` is fine. For plans with 3+ phases, create a directory: ``` brain/plans/42-mvp/ ├── overview.md ├── phase-1-scaffold.md ├── phase-2-layout.md ├── phase-3-drawing.md └── testing.md ``` Non-phase files (like `testing.md`) are fine alongside phases. ### Overview file Must include: - **Context** — what problem this solves and why - **Scope** — what's included, what's explicitly excluded - **Constraints** — technical, platform, dependency, or pattern constraints - **Applicable skills** — domain skills from Step 4 (list by name so implementers invoke them) - **Phases** — ordered links to phase files: `[[plans/42-mvp/phase-1-scaffold]]` - **Verification** — project-level verification commands ### Phase files Each phase file must include: - Back-link: `Back to [[plans/42-mvp/overview]]` - **Goal** — what this phase accomplishes - **Changes** — which files are affected and what changes, described at a high level - **Data structures** — name the key types/schemas before logic, but a one-line sketch is enough — don't write full definitions - **Verification** — static and runtime checks for this phase (see Step 6) **Keep plans high-level.** Describe *what* and *why*, not *how* at the code level. A phase should read like a brief to a senior engineer: goals, boundaries, key types, and verification — not code snippets or pseudocode. Order phases per the sequencing principle: infrastructure and shared types first, features after. Each phase should be independently shippable. **Skill changes:** If a phase involves creating or updating a skill (any file in `.claude/skills/` or `.agents/skills/`), the phase must instruct the implementer to use the `skill-creator` skill during that phase. ### Redesign check For changes touching existing code, apply redesign-from-first-principles: > "If we were building this from scratch with this requirement, what would we build?" Don't bolt changes onto existing designs — redesign holistically. ### Alternatives check For architectural decisions, briefly sketch 2-3 approaches in the overview's Constraints section. State which was chosen and why. This prevents premature commitment and documents the design space explored. ## Step 6 — Verification Strategy Every phase **must** have a verification section with both: ### Static - Type checking passes - Linting passes - Code follows project conventions - Tests written and passing ### Runtime - What to test manually (launch the app, exercise the feature path) - What automated tests to write (unit, integration, e2e) - Edge cases to cover - For UI: visual verification via screenshot Per prove-it-works: "it compiles" is not verification. Every phase must describe how to **prove** the change works. ## Step 7 — Update Plans Index Update `brain/plans/index.md` with a wikilink to the new plan's overview. Do NOT edit `brain/index.md` — the auto-index hook maintains it automatically. ## Step 8 — Present to User Summarize the plan: list the phases, scope boundaries, applicable skills, and verification approach. Ask the user to review the plan files in `brain/plans/`. **Stop here.** Do not begin implementation. The user decides when and how to execute the plan.
Ver no GitHub