Skip to main content

aqe-plan-work

Build dependency-aware execution plans for complex Agentic QE, Ruflo, integration, migration, or multi-stream engineering programs. Use when Codex must turn research or requirements into phased work, select a small AQE fleet, map critical paths and parallel streams, define acceptance gates, or sequence risky changes. Use aqe-plan-quality instead when the primary output is only a test or quality plan.

Informações da origem

Repositório
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Última atividade na origem
2 de agosto de 2026 às 08:48
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
494
Forks
98

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos
3 arquivos

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
aqe-plan-work
description
Build dependency-aware execution plans for complex Agentic QE, Ruflo, integration, migration, or multi-stream engineering programs. Use when Codex must turn research or requirements into phased work, select a small AQE fleet, map critical paths and parallel streams, define acceptance gates, or sequence risky changes. Use aqe-plan-quality instead when the primary output is only a test or quality plan.
# Plan AQE Work 1. Read `AGENTS.md`, the objective, relevant research, affected implementation, tests, configuration, and public boundaries. 2. Define observable outcomes, non-goals, constraints, assumptions, and decisions that require human approval. 3. Decompose work into independently verifiable deliverables. Map dependencies, consumers, migrations, compatibility boundaries, and rollback points. 4. Select the smallest useful specialist fleet with [references/planning-framework.md](references/planning-framework.md). Give every selected specialty a concrete output; do not summon the whole fleet. 5. Arrange phases so contracts, safety controls, and durable tests precede or accompany implementation. Check CLI/MCP and Claude/Codex parity when shared capabilities cross those surfaces. 6. Identify work that can run in parallel and a clear critical path. Do not use unsupported precision for time estimates; size work by risk and dependency. 7. Attach acceptance criteria and the narrowest verification command to each deliverable. Include security, resilience, performance, accessibility, or data-integrity gates only when triggered by the actual scope. 8. End with prioritized milestones, risks and mitigations, open decisions, and a recommended first vertical slice. Use Ruflo for persistent memory, learned routing, hooks, or multi-agent coordination only when its operational benefit exceeds its setup overhead. Treat Claude agent definitions as domain references; translate their workflows into available Codex actions rather than copying Claude-only tool syntax.
Ver no GitHub