Organize domain logic in app/business/ by domain cohesion and transport independence. Use when creating a file in app/business/, adding a function to one, naming a business module, deciding whether logic belongs in business or in a transport (app/mcp/, app/ingest/), or choosing what a business file may import.
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
business-folder
description
Organize domain logic in app/business/ by domain cohesion and transport independence. Use when creating a file in app/business/, adding a function to one, naming a business module, deciding whether logic belongs in business or in a transport (app/mcp/, app/ingest/), or choosing what a business file may import.
Business Folder
Everything here documents the repository as it is on main. If main disagrees with this file, main wins: follow it and flag the drift.
app/business/ holds the most valuable code in the product — the domain logic that defines what Discord Manager does. Transports come and go: the MCP server and the gateway daemon are both thin shells over this folder.
The guiding question: if the MCP server and the gateway client were both replaced tomorrow, could the business folder come along unchanged?
Every file is named after the business domain it serves, every function belongs to that domain, and the code stays independent of transport concerns.
Transport independence
Business functions never import @modelcontextprotocol/sdk, never import a discord.js gateway Client, and never touch process.argv, stdio, or process lifecycle. Those dependencies tie domain logic to the current transport and make it impossible to extract.
What belongs in business files
Third-party domain libraries — composable-functions, zod, kysely, and discord.js REST primitives used to call the Discord API
Database access — db() from ~/db/db.server, the product's instance of the framework's makeDb factory (Kysely is transport-agnostic)
Environment config — env from ~/env.server (Zod-validated, no transport dependency)
Other business files — ./auth.server, ./channels.server, respecting the no-cross-imports rule
What belongs in the transports
app/ingest/ — constructing the discord.js Client, declaring intents and partials, registering gateway event listeners, reconnect handling, the daemon entrypoint. Handlers translate an event into arguments and call one business function.
app/mcp/ — the McpTool shape, JSON-schema projection, listTools/callTool dispatch, the stdio transport, the process entrypoint. Load mcp-server for that layer's rules.
app/db/scripts/ — migration, rollback, and codegen entrypoints.
A gateway handler or a tool that contains a domain decision is a bug in the layering: push the decision into app/business/.
Acceptable framework wrappers
makeJob and makeCronJob from ~/framework/scheduler.server are acceptable inside business files. Scheduling is a business concern, and these wrap the in-process runner without dragging in a transport. app/business/jobs.server.ts holds the registered jobs array; the daemon only runs it. Load background-jobs before writing or changing a job.
The context file
auth.server.ts is the entry point to every gate: it builds the owner context from env plus the store and exports ownerContextSchema. The rest of the business layer imports the schemas from it — never a wider surface — and validates against them through applySchema. Load composable-functions for how context validation works, and mcp-server for why no gate is ever re-implemented in a tool.
Naming rule
Name files after the business domain, not the implementation detail.
✅ ingestion.server.ts — domain: recording what happens on the server
✅ bookmarks.server.ts — domain: bookmark management
✅ sending.server.ts — domain: posting as the owner's bot
❌ discord-js.server.ts — named after the library, not the domain it serves
❌ rest-client.server.ts — same problem: transport name, not business domain
Infrastructure exception
A file providing generic infrastructure primitives may be named after its provider, because the provider is its domain — it wraps a service API without embedding product-specific logic. The test: if the file contains schemas, business rules, copy maps, or domain-specific processing, it belongs in a domain-named file, even when every function calls the same external API.
File suffixes
.server.ts — business logic (database queries, Discord API calls, jobs)
.common.ts — schemas, copy maps, and named constants for a domain, importable from anywhere
.test.ts / .server.test.ts / .common.test.ts — unit tests, colocated with the implementation
One export block
Each business file ends with a single export { ... } block listing its public functions, plus a single export type { ... } block for its exported types. Declarations are plain function/const at the top level, never export function inline. One block makes the file's public surface readable in one glance and makes it obvious when a helper is being exported only for a test — which is not a reason to export it.
Cohesion rule
Every function in a file belongs to that file's domain. A function serving a different domain moves to the file that owns it.
Signs of poor cohesion:
A file named after a Discord API surface but holding bookmark rules
Functions in a file consumed only by a single other domain
A file whose functions relate to each other only by implementation detail
No cross-imports
Business files must not create circular dependencies:
✅ digests.server.ts → imports from → channels.server.ts
❌ channels.server.ts → imports from → digests.server.ts
When two files need the same utility, in order of preference:
Merge the files if they serve the same domain
Keep a private copy in each file if the utility is small and trivial
Extract to a new file only if the utility is substantial and shared by three or more files
Option 3 is not available to Kysely query fragments — a latestBotIdentityOf, a ranked-latest-revision subquery. The parity test reads every exported function in app/business/*.server.ts as an owner-facing surface, so exporting a fragment from a shared file would demand a parity-exemptions.ts entry that is false by the mcp-server skill's own standard: a query fragment is not a machine surface. A fragment therefore stays a verbatim private copy in each domain file however many files carry it — sanctioned duplication, not a smell to fix or a finding to report.
When to merge vs split
Merge when files serve the same business domain, even when they use different external APIs internally. The library used is an implementation detail, not a reason to separate files.
Split when a file grows to cover distinct business domains. The right boundary is the domain, not the file size.
Promoting seed logic to production
Dev-seed logic promoted to a production path must be re-derived under production invariants, never moved wholesale. Seed conveniences — synthetic snowflakes from nextDiscordId(), blanket channel enrollment, fabricated gateway connections that make health read green — are deliberate shortcuts that become product behavior nobody chose the moment an ingest or MCP path re-runs them against a real store. Rebuild the specific behavior the production path needs; never reuse the seed's fan-out.
Litmus test
Before creating or modifying a business file, check:
Could this file survive replacing the MCP server or the gateway client?
Does the name describe the business domain (what it does) rather than the implementation (how it does it)?
Do all functions in this file belong to the same domain?
Would someone unfamiliar with the codebase find this function here based on the filename?
Does this file import @modelcontextprotocol/sdk, a gateway Client, or anything from app/mcp/ or app/ingest/? If so, the logic is in the wrong layer.
A wrong answer to any of these means the file needs changes.
