Skip to main content

edit-discipline

Change files with the edit and write tools, never by rewriting them through bash (sed, awk, tee, heredoc, redirection), and show `git diff` before reporting a file-changing task as done. Triggers: edit, write, modify, refactor, patch, fix, diff, review changes.

Informações da origem

Repositório
softspark/ai-toolkit
Última atividade na origem
3 de setembro de 2026 às 08:42
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
177
Forks
21

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
edit-discipline
description
Change files with the edit and write tools, never by rewriting them through bash (sed, awk, tee, heredoc, redirection), and show `git diff` before reporting a file-changing task as done. Triggers: edit, write, modify, refactor, patch, fix, diff, review changes.
effort
low
user-invocable
false
allowed-tools
Read
# Edit Discipline This rule comes from `app/rules/edit-discipline.md` in ai-toolkit. It applies to every task in this workspace, not only when it is loaded. # Edit Discipline & Reviewable Changes ## Edit files with the editing tools, not the shell Use the `edit` and `write` tools to change a file. Do not rewrite tracked files through `bash` with `sed`, `awk`, `tee`, a heredoc, or `>` redirection. This is not a style preference. A shell rewrite is opaque to the host: the session records a command, not a change. An `edit` call records which file changed and how, so the interface can render it, a reviewer can read it, and a later turn can cite it. A `sed` line records none of that, and the only way to find out what happened is to read the file again. The shell remains correct for what it is for: running builds, tests, linters, git, package managers, and generators that own their own output. ## Show the change before calling the work done Before reporting a file-changing task as finished, show what changed: ```bash git diff -- <paths> # tracked files git status --short # what is new or removed ``` Paste the diff into the reply, or state precisely why it is too large and summarise it by file with the counts. A task that reports success without showing the change asks the reader to take the result on trust, and the reader is the one who has to decide whether to commit it. For an untracked file, show the content you wrote, not a description of it. ## Why both halves matter together Editing through the tools makes a change *recordable*; showing the diff makes it *reviewed*. Either alone leaves the person deciding whether to ship blind to something they are accountable for.
Ver no GitHub