Creates a Serenity-style interactive self-contained HTML mindmap for industries, companies, groups, and ecosystems: first split a company into business domains when needed, then produce a project-local `.html` file in the Musk Ecosystem Mindmap pattern with an expandable tree, selected-node detail, evidence grades, public/private companies, A股/港股 mappings, recent 3-month/6-month/1-year price performance for recommended research names, catalysts, falsification tests, copy-to-clipboard drilldown prompts, and bottom stock-detail cards. This skill must output HTML only, never `.canvas.tsx`. Use when the user asks for 产业链交互文档, 可交互产业链, Serenity 工作流, 卡脖子地图, 公司业务拆解, mindmap, 脑图, HTML交互图, or asks to click/query any supply-chain环节.
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.
Creates a Serenity-style interactive self-contained HTML mindmap for industries, companies, groups, and ecosystems: first split a company into business domains when needed, then produce a project-local `.html` file in the Musk Ecosystem Mindmap pattern with an expandable tree, selected-node detail, evidence grades, public/private companies, A股/港股 mappings, recent 3-month/6-month/1-year price performance for recommended research names, catalysts, falsification tests, copy-to-clipboard drilldown prompts, and bottom stock-detail cards. This skill must output HTML only, never `.canvas.tsx`. Use when the user asks for 产业链交互文档, 可交互产业链, Serenity 工作流, 卡脖子地图, 公司业务拆解, mindmap, 脑图, HTML交互图, or asks to click/query any supply-chain环节.
Serenity Interactive Chain
Use this skill to turn a theme, company, group, or ecosystem into a project-local self-contained HTML research artifact first, then support domain-by-domain and node-by-node follow-up questions.
Trigger
Use when the user wants a Serenity-style workflow, an interactive industry-chain document, a bottleneck map, company business-domain decomposition, or the ability to ask about any domain/layer/node in a supply chain.
Required workflow
Use this skill as the single Serenity entrypoint. Do not trigger or load any other Serenity-related skill. Apply the stack-first research lens inside this skill: start from terminal demand, map physical layers, identify scarce constraints, then render the result as an interactive HTML mindmap.
HTML-only output. Produce or update exactly one project-local self-contained .html file as the primary deliverable. Do not create Cursor Canvas files, .canvas.tsx files, React apps, or multi-file web apps for this skill.
Scope. Infer or ask briefly for: input type, theme/company/ecosystem, geography (global/A股/港股/美股), horizon, and whether the user wants names now or only the chain map. Default: AI infrastructure, global + A股对应, 6-18 months.
If the input is a company/group/ecosystem, split business domains first. Do not flatten a multi-business company into one chain. Build a top-level domain map before supply-chain nodes:
domainId: short stable id, e.g. D1-starlink, D2-launch, D3-starshield
domain: business domain name
owner: company/subsidiary/ecosystem owner
product: what is being sold or deployed
revenueDriver: what makes demand grow
supplyChainStart: where the physical chain begins
keyBottleneck: likely highest-priority constraint in that domain
boundary: whether this belongs to the company, a sibling company, or a broader ecosystem
Examples:
SpaceX should be split into Starlink, Launch/Falcon, Starship, Dragon/Human Spaceflight, Starshield/Government, Ground Infrastructure, and Terafab/compute if relevant.
Tesla should be split into EVs, Energy storage, Supercharging, FSD/AI compute, Optimus, batteries, and manufacturing automation.
"Musk ecosystem" can include SpaceX, Tesla/Optimus, xAI, Neuralink, and Boring, but clearly mark cross-company boundaries.
Research the stack. For each domain, build 4-9 layers from terminal demand down to materials/consumables. Every supply-chain node must include a domainId and:
id: short stable id, e.g. L3-cw-laser
domainId: parent business domain
layer: layer name and order
summary: required. Write 2-4 detailed plain-Chinese sentences, not a one-line label. Explain the physical object/process/software layer, where it sits upstream/downstream, what it connects to, and what it is not. Use the same depth as a good "glass substrate / TGV" explanation: definition, value-chain position, and boundary versus nearby concepts.
role: required. What this node does in the system. Explain its practical function in demand release, performance, yield, cost, reliability, integration, or deployment speed.
replaces: required. What it replaces, supplements, or competes with. If there is no direct substitute, say so. If replacement is conditional, state whether it is a near-term supplement, partial replacement, long-term architecture shift, or only a route option.
constraint: why it may become a bottleneck
evidence: confirmed, management-claim, inferred, or needs-verification
companies: overseas, A股/港股, private names if relevant
status: consensus/crowded, repricing, underfollowed, too early
performance: for recommended public research names only, include recent price performance over 3个月, 6个月, and 1年.
Support recursive drilldown. Any selected domain or node can become a new root for deeper decomposition. When the user says a level is not detailed enough, expand that selected item into a second-level stack using:
L0: terminal demand / deployment scenario
L1: system or module
L2: core mechanism / actuator / chip / process
L3: precision subcomponent
L4: materials / consumables
L5: equipment / testing / qualification
L6: assembly / integration / yield
L7: infrastructure / energy / logistics
Omit levels that do not apply, but preserve the numbered level labels visible in the HTML mindmap. Example: selecting D4-tesla-optimus should reveal sublayers such as actuator module, harmonic reducer, roller screw, frameless motor, bearings, force sensors, dexterous hand, battery/thermal, control PCB/harness, and final assembly/testing.
Create the interactive HTML mindmap. The .html file must be the primary deliverable. It must use a simplified Musk Ecosystem Mindmap interaction pattern, not a static report, dashboard, flat table, Cursor Canvas, or generic card panel.
Mandatory mindmap implementation pattern: build one inline JavaScript nodes[] data tree and render it with recursive tree navigation. Use stable parent-child IDs (root, D1-*, D1-N1-*, D1-N1-S1-*) rather than separate unconnected arrays for domains and nodes.
Mandatory two-column layout by default: left = expandable mindmap tree; right = selected node detail and action buttons. Do not include a 同层节点 / sibling nodes middle column unless the user explicitly asks for peer comparison.
Mandatory visual shape: the generated HTML should look and behave like a simplified Musk Ecosystem Mindmap: title ending in Mindmap, stat strip, short interaction callout, 脑图导航 card, 节点详情 card, bottom 个股分析详情 section when stocks are present, and a final 边界 note.
Do not substitute: do not use a bar chart, heatmap, table-first report, filter dashboard, sibling-node panel, or generic left-domain/right-detail layout as the primary interface unless the user explicitly asks for a non-mindmap view.
mindmap navigation nodes must display compact labels next to the node name: node type (生态/业务域/节点/子层), market status (已拥挤/重估中/仍冷门/过早), evidence grade (强证据/报道披露/推断/待核实), and current chokepoint state (当下卡点/候选卡点/已定价卡点/远期卡点). These labels should also appear in sibling/peer comparison cards.
node detail panels must explain nodes as research objects, not ticker labels. By default every node should render:
它是什么: detailed definition of the layer/object/process, including where it sits in the value chain and what it is not.
它的作用: the practical system role, such as enabling throughput, bandwidth, yield, power delivery, reliability, cost reduction, or deployment speed.
Market performance data requirement. If the output contains a recommended/priority public-company list, current candidate ranking, or named public tickers intended for research, gather and show recent price performance before finalizing.
Required columns/fields: 3个月涨跌幅, 6个月涨跌幅, 1年涨跌幅, 数据截至日期, and 行情来源.
Use live or recent market-data/web sources when available. Do not rely on memory for price performance.
Preferred free/open-source source: AKShare (akshare, MIT, no token) because it covers A股、港股、美股 historical daily data. Use adjusted daily prices where possible: A股 stock_zh_a_hist(..., adjust="qfq"), 港股 stock_hk_hist(..., adjust="qfq"), 美股 stock_us_daily(..., adjust="qfq") or the currently documented AKShare equivalent.
Secondary open-source source for A股: efinance (ef.stock.get_quote_history(..., klt=101, fqt=1)), especially when AKShare is unavailable but Python package installation is allowed.
Direct-source fallback: Sina daily K line can be used when AKShare/efinance/Eastmoney are unstable, but label the output as 未复权 and treat it as a fallback rather than the preferred basis.
Do not let market-data retries block the HTML. If a batch request stalls, times out repeatedly, or a background retry produces no usable rows, stop that attempt, switch data source, and mark any still-missing ticker as 待查.
Secondary source: yfinance for US/global tickers and cross-checking. Treat it as unofficial Yahoo Finance access; it can break or throttle, so cache/retry and cite Yahoo/yfinance as the source.
A股 fallback: direct public quote pages/APIs such as 东方财富、同花顺、新浪、腾讯财经, or open wrappers like a-stock-data when AKShare endpoints fail. Respect rate limits and verify ticker format.
Do not use Tushare as the default free source: it requires a token and many useful endpoints depend on points/permissions. Use it only if the user has a token/permissions or explicitly asks for it.
If live market data is unavailable, do not invent numbers. Write 待查 for the missing windows and include the exact source path to verify, such as exchange quote page, company ticker page, Yahoo Finance, TradingView, Nasdaq, HKEX, Eastmoney, 同花顺, Wind/Choice if available to the user, or broker quote page.
Treat performance as context, not a recommendation. A name can be close to the scarce layer but already overextended; conversely a flat name can still be weak if evidence is poor.
Use this HTML implementation skeleton unless there is a strong reason not to.
Start with exactly one <!doctype html>, one <html lang="zh-CN">, inline <style>, inline <script>, and one closing </html>.
Define inline arrays/objects: nodes, stocks when public-company detail is needed, and stockNodeMap.
Node objects should include id, parent, domainId, title, kind, summary, role, replaces, why, companies, aShare, evidence, heat, verify, catalysts, falsification, and nextQuestions.
The tree renderer must be recursive, expandable, searchable, persist selected/expanded state in localStorage, and show compact labels inline next to every node.
The selected-node detail must render summary under 它是什么, role under 它的作用, replaces under 替代 / 补充谁, why under 为什么可能卡脖子, plus structured A股/港股 mapping and copy-prompt actions.
The top-level layout should use a two-column CSS grid like grid-template-columns: minmax(360px, .9fr) minmax(560px, 1.35fr), with no sibling-node column by default.
Do not use React, external packages, CDN assets, , module imports, or Cursor Canvas APIs.
Follow-up handling. When the user asks about any domain/node/layer/company from the HTML mindmap:
map their wording to the domain id, node id, layer, or company;
answer with a focused underwrite sheet: position in chain, why it bottlenecks, evidence, companies, what is already priced, what to verify next, and what would break it;
if new evidence changes the map, update the project-local HTML file, then mention its path.
if the user says the decomposition is not detailed enough, treat it as a product requirement: update the HTML mindmap to add the missing nested levels and update this skill if the behavior should persist.
Investment boundary. Keep all output as research support. Do not issue direct buy/sell commands or guaranteed returns.
HTML content standard
The first HTML mindmap should stand alone without chat context. It needs a clear title ending in Mindmap, thesis sentence, top-level domain map when applicable, source/evidence notes, bottom stock-detail cards when stocks are present, copy-to-clipboard action buttons, and a disclaimer: 仅作产业链研究，不构成投资建议。
Default final message after creating HTML
Keep it short: link the .html file, say it is interactive, name 2-3 highest-priority layers, and invite the user to ask by node ID or company name.
替代 / 补充谁: direct substitute, partial substitute, complementary route, or no direct replacement. If adoption depends on customer architecture/qualification, say that explicitly.
为什么可能卡脖子: the scarce-layer mechanism, preferably tied to physics, process control, equipment, materials, certification, or capacity.
关联A股近期涨跌幅: when A股 / 港股映射 names public stocks, show 3个月, 半年, and 1年 price performance, plus 数据截至日期, 行情来源, and adjustment basis (前复权/后复权/未复权). Treat performance as context, not as a recommendation.
for emerging architecture shifts such as glass substrates/TGV, CPO, silicon photonics, HBM4, advanced substrates, or new power/cooling routes, be explicit about timing: current bottleneck, candidate bottleneck, future route option, or narrative-only.
define market status consistently:
仍冷门: the node is plausibly important but not yet broadly priced or discussed.
重估中: the market has started noticing and repricing the node, but the thesis may not be fully reflected yet; verify whether the move is backed by orders, margins, capacity, or filings.
已拥挤: the node is consensus or narrative-heavy; use it as demand proof, not necessarily as the best entry point.
过早: the node may matter later, but commercialization, evidence, or timing is not ready.
a top-level business-domain map when the input is a company/group/ecosystem;
domain and layer decomposition must be represented as parent-child tree nodes, not as standalone filter tabs;
the detail panel must show the current path above the selected node so users do not lose context after removing the sibling-node column;
clickable/selectable nodes with detail panel;
domain IDs and node IDs visible so the user can ask follow-ups by ID;
after drilldown, add the selected domain/node's internal levels as child subnode entries in the tree and as "下一层" buttons in the detail panel;
node detail panels may include a "continue drilling" subsection; if a selected node has meaningful sublayers, render child subnodes with stable IDs and a child-detail area;
when the HTML recommends or highlights public companies as research priorities, show a compact 近期涨跌幅 section in the selected-node detail panel or stock card: 3个月, 6个月, 1年. Keep this separate from the supply-chain thesis so users can distinguish price action from fundamental bottleneck quality.
every public A股/港股 stock rendered in 关联A股近期涨跌幅 must include a per-stock 验证 copy-prompt button. The prompt must name the target HTML file, selected nodeId, node title, stock name, ticker, and the instruction to verify the stock's exact value-chain position, order/customer/revenue evidence, latest 3个月/6个月/1年 performance data, whether the move is already priced, falsification conditions, and to update the current HTML only if the mapping/evidence/status/performance changes.
node detail panels should include copy-prompt action buttons:
生成子层 / 继续细化: copy a prompt asking the agent to deepen this node and update the current HTML file.
补证据: copy a prompt asking the agent to strengthen evidence, source grade, validation path, and falsification.
找A股映射: copy a prompt asking the agent to add or refine A股/港股 mappings and verification checks.
重新评估: copy a prompt asking the agent to re-check whether the node is still a current chokepoint, whether market status/evidence grade/chokepoint state should change, and whether mappings remain accurate.
action buttons must copy prompts that pass the target HTML path, selected domainId, nodeId, node title, and the instruction to update that HTML file, so the user does not need to copy IDs manually.
tables only where comparison helps inside detail sections; they are never the primary navigation.
swimlane/heatmap/table views are auxiliary comparison views, not the default primary navigation, unless the user explicitly asks for them.
no network calls; embed all data, CSS, and JavaScript inline in the single HTML file.
HTML tree click behavior: clicking a node selects it and expands it; clicking the same already-selected expanded node collapses it. Do not require modifier keys such as Alt. Leaf nodes simply select.
HTML bottom stock-detail layout: use a true two-column masonry-style layout for stock detail cards (column-count: 2, card break-inside: avoid, mobile column-count: 1) rather than a row-based CSS grid that stretches collapsed cards and leaves large blank boxes.
HTML stock-to-node navigation: every stock detail card must provide a compact jump-back affordance next to the ticker, preferably a small ↑ icon beside 股票名 / 代码. Clicking it selects the corresponding mindmap node, expands its ancestors, scrolls back to the map, and stops propagation so it does not toggle the stock card. Do not add a large extra 对应脑图 button in the card body.
HTML selected-node A股/港股映射: do not leave A股 / 港股映射 as text only. In the selected-node detail panel, render a structured stock list similar to 股票名 代码 + 3个月/半年/1年涨跌幅 + 数据截至/来源 + 分析个股. Sort this list by logic strength, strongest first: evidence hardness, valuation not already exhausted, closeness to the scarce layer, and elasticity. If using a scorecard, sort by total score, then evidence score, then scarce-layer/choke score. Parent nodes should aggregate mapped stocks from descendant nodes; leaf nodes should show only their directly mapped stocks.
HTML ranking occurrence count: top stock-ranking tables must include an 出现 / occurrence column showing how many mindmap nodes mention or map to the stock. Use the count as a light priority boost and tie-breaker: multi-node coverage (e.g. both optical-module and cooling/power exposure) should rank above otherwise similar single-node names, but it should not override weak evidence or poor closeness to the scarce layer. Compute occurrence from explicit stockId/code -> nodeId mappings plus node aShare/company text mentions.
HTML ranking table sorting: each numeric/score column in the top ranking table (综合, 出现, 证据, 估值未透支, 离卡点&弹性, 1年涨幅) should include compact ascending/descending controls. Default visual style: subtle stacked chevrons/triangles (▲/▼) next to the column label, grey when inactive and accent-colored when active, not heavy button pills. Percent columns must sort by parsed numeric value, not by string. The default sort remains the overall priority logic.
HTML stock mapping data: maintain a stock-code/id -> node-id map for the jump-back affordance. When adding a new node or moving a stock to a more precise layer, update this map, the parent node aShare, the stock card text, and any ranking/summary verdict that mentions the affected layer.
HTML stock card actions: keep the detail-card body focused on 验证 / 下钻 / 交叉验证 copy-prompt buttons. Navigation back to the tree belongs in the compact ticker-line ↑ affordance.
HTML stock action prompt clarity:验证, 下钻, and 交叉验证 must use different prompt templates, not the same generic prompt with only the verb changed.
验证: fact-check and update only the bottom 个股分析详情 card for that stock. Confirm exact value-chain position, order/customer/revenue evidence, latest 3/6/12-month performance, priced-in status, evidence quality, and falsification. Do not change tree nodes, stockNodeMap, top ranking, or score fields; if those structural fields should change, write a proposed-update note inside the stock detail card and wait for user confirmation.
下钻: stock-level drilldown updates only the bottom 个股分析详情 card for that stock. Decompose the stock's strongest value-chain position into 3-6 finer verification facets, but write them inside the stock card as 建议下钻结构 / 验证面; do not create tree nodes, change stockNodeMap, top ranking, or score fields unless the user separately confirms a node-level update. Node-level buttons such as 生成子层 are the controls that may modify the mindmap structure.
交叉验证: cross-check and update only the bottom 个股分析详情 card for that stock. Use at least three independent source types, compare against peers/substitutes, separate strong evidence from reported/inferred claims, look for反证, and check valuation/crowding. Do not change tree nodes, stockNodeMap, top ranking, or score fields; if those structural fields should change, write a proposed-update note inside the stock detail card and wait for user confirmation.
HTML stats and document integrity: whenever nodes or stock cards are added/removed, update visible stat counts and verify there is exactly one <!doctype html> and one closing </html>.
For private companies, write 未上市 instead of price performance.
For multi-listing companies, state which listing/ticker was used.
