| name | ai-act-compliance |
| title | AI Act Compliance |
| description | Supports compliance with the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when the user needs to classify an AI system under the AI Act risk categories (prohibited, high-risk, limited, minimal, GPAI), check provider or deployer obligations for high-risk systems, evaluate GPAI model obligations including systemic risk thresholds, verify transparency obligations under Article 50, or run a fundamental rights impact assessment (FRIA) under Article 27. Target users are AI system providers, deployers, importers, distributors, EU consultants on AI compliance, and engineers building AI products for the EU market. |
| author | morellid |
| author_url | https://github.com/morellid/ai-act-skill |
| license | MIT |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| execution_mode | open |
| jurisdiction | eu |
| practice | regulatory |
| language | en |
AI Act Compliance
EU Regulation 2024/1689 — practical compliance support for AI providers, deployers, and consultants.
When to use this skill
Use when someone needs to:
- Classify an AI system or model under the AI Act (in scope? prohibited? high-risk? limited risk? minimal? GPAI? GPAI with systemic risk?)
- Identify the role(s) the organisation plays (provider, deployer, importer, distributor)
- Check obligations applicable to a high-risk system as provider (Articles 8–22)
- Check obligations applicable to a high-risk system as deployer (Articles 26–27, including FRIA)
- Check obligations applicable to a GPAI model provider (Articles 51–55)
- Verify transparency obligations under Article 50 (chatbots, synthetic content, emotion recognition, biometric categorisation, deepfakes)
- Map applicable dates of application for the specific system or role
Do not use when the user asks for:
- Legal advice on a specific case (this needs an EU AI lawyer with case-specific knowledge)
- Pre-existing legal opinions on national implementation in a specific Member State (rules will be added by national supervisory authorities; not yet finalised in many countries as of 2026)
- Drafting of EU-AI-Act-conformity declarations (CE marking) — the skill structures the documentation but does not produce the final signed document
- Compliance with sector-specific regimes that interact with the AI Act (e.g., Medical Devices Regulation, automotive type-approval) — these need dedicated skills
Disclaimer
This skill is a support tool for compliance work, not a substitute for qualified legal or technical counsel. The AI Act is recent legislation with phased application (most obligations between 2 February 2025 and 2 August 2027) and the harmonised standards under preparation by CEN-CENELEC JTC 21 are not yet published. Outputs require review by competent counsel and, for high-risk systems, by a notified body where applicable. Penalties under Article 99 reach EUR 35 million or 7% of total worldwide annual turnover for prohibited-practice violations.
Pending: Digital Omnibus on AI. Provisional political agreement reached on 7 May 2026 between the European Parliament and the Council on the Commission's 19 November 2025 proposal. The agreement: (i) shifts high-risk obligations to 2 December 2027 (Annex III stand-alone systems and Article 50 transparency) and 2 August 2028 (Annex I embedded safety components); (ii) adds a new Article 5 prohibition on AI systems generating non-consensual intimate imagery ("nudifier apps") and CSAM, with compliance once in force; (iii) narrows the "safety component" definition (excludes assistive or performance-optimising AI from Annex I high-risk); (iv) extends SME exemptions to small mid-cap enterprises; (v) streamlines GPAI enforcement through the EU AI Office. Formal adoption and OJ publication are pending (co-legislator target: before 2 August 2026). Until OJ publication, the binding deadlines remain the original Article 113 calendar and the new Article 5 prohibition is not yet in force. Article 4 (AI literacy) and the existing Article 5 prohibitions — in force since 2 February 2025 — and Chapter V GPAI obligations — in force since 2 August 2025 — are not affected. Skill outputs should mention the pending change whenever 2 August 2026 high-risk or Article 50 deadlines are cited, and flag systems that may fall under the future nudifier/CSAM prohibition.
