test-driven-development

name	test-driven-development
description	Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code - write the test first, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass; ensures tests actually verify behavior by requiring failure first

*CRITICAL* Add the following steps to your Todo list using TodoWrite:

1. Write failing tests (RED phase)

2. Create a subagent using the nori-task-runner to evaluate test quality.

• Ensure that each test does not just test mocks. If it does, remove the test and try again.
• Ensure each test does not test implementation detail. If it does, rewrite the test so that it tests boundary behavior.
• Ensure each test does not test data structure format or types. If it does, remove the test and try again.
• Ensure each test does not test for removed behavior. For example, if some behavior has been deprecated, do not write a test that simply confirms the behavior no longer works.
• Evaluate if the test treats the interior of the test boundary as a blackbox. You should not know anything about interior variables, function calls, or control flow.

3. Verify the test fails due to the behavior of the application, and NOT due to the test. If you have more than one test that you need to write, you should write all of them before moving to the GREEN phase.
4. Write the minimal amount of code necessary to make the test pass (GREEN phase)
5. Verify the test now passes due to the behavior of the application.
   • If you go through three loops without making progress, switch to running /home/amol/code/nori/nori-luma-cli/.worktrees/mild-log-20260608-224550/.claude/skills/creating-debug-tests-and-iterating
6. Refactor the code to clean it up.
7. Verify tests still pass.

RED - Write Failing Test

Write one minimal test showing what should happen.

test('retries failed operations 3 times', async () => {
  let attempts = 0;
  const operation = () => {
    attempts++;
    if (attempts < 3) throw new Error('fail');
    return 'success';
  };

  const result = await foobar.retryOperation(operation);

  expect(result).toBe('success');
  expect(attempts).toBe(3);
});

Clear name, tests real behavior, one thing. Note that the tested operation is imported -- this is a STRONG sign that this is testing something real.

test('retry works', async () => {
  const mock = jest
    .fn()
    .mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error())
    .mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error())
    .mockResolvedValueOnce('success');
  await retryOperation(mock);
  expect(mock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3);
});

Vague name, tests mock not code

Verify RED - Watch It Fail

npm test path/to/test.test.ts

Confirm:

• Test fails (not errors)
• Failure message is expected
• Fails because feature missing (not typos)

GREEN - Minimal Code

Write simplest code to pass the test.

```typescript async function retryOperation(fn: () => Promise): Promise { for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) { try { return await fn(); } catch (e) { if (i === 2) throw e; } } throw new Error('unreachable'); } ``` Just enough to pass ```typescript async function retryOperation( fn: () => Promise, options?: { maxRetries?: number; backoff?: 'linear' | 'exponential'; onRetry?: (attempt: number) => void; } ): Promise { // YAGNI } ``` Over-engineered

Don't add features, refactor other code, or "improve" beyond the test.

Verify GREEN - Watch It Pass

npm test path/to/test.test.ts

Confirm:

• Test passes
• Other tests still pass
• Output pristine (no errors, warnings)

REFACTOR - Clean Up

After green only:

• Remove duplication
• Improve names
• Extract helpers

Keep tests green. Do not add behavior.