entry-point-analyzer

name	entry-point-analyzer
description	Analyzes smart contract codebases to identify state-changing entry points for security auditing. Detects externally callable functions that modify state, categorizes them by access level (public, admin, role-restricted, contract-only), and generates structured audit reports. Excludes view/pure/read-only functions. Use when auditing smart contracts (Solidity, Vyper, Solana/Rust, Move, TON, CosmWasm) or when asked to find entry points, audit flows, external functions, access control patterns, or privileged operations.
allowed-tools	Read Grep Glob Bash

Entry Point Analyzer

Systematically identify all state-changing entry points in a smart contract codebase to guide security audits.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

• Starting a smart contract security audit to map the attack surface
• Asked to find entry points, external functions, or audit flows
• Analyzing access control patterns across a codebase
• Identifying privileged operations and role-restricted functions
• Building an understanding of which functions can modify contract state

When NOT to Use

Do NOT use this skill for:

• Vulnerability detection (use audit-context-building or domain-specific-audits)
• Writing exploit POCs (use solidity-poc-builder)
• Code quality or gas optimization analysis
• Non-smart-contract codebases
• Analyzing read-only functions (this skill excludes them)

Scope: State-Changing Functions Only

This skill focuses exclusively on functions that can modify state. Excluded:

Language	Excluded Patterns
Solidity	view, pure functions
Vyper	@view, @pure functions
Solana	Functions without mut account references
Move	Non-entry public fun (module-callable only)
TON	get methods (FunC), read-only receivers (Tact)
CosmWasm	query entry point and its handlers

Why exclude read-only functions? They cannot directly cause loss of funds or state corruption. While they may leak information, the primary audit focus is on functions that can change state.

Workflow

1. Detect Language - Identify contract language(s) from file extensions and syntax
2. Use Tooling (if available) - For Solidity, check if Slither is available and use it
3. Locate Contracts - Find all contract/module files (apply directory filter if specified)
4. Extract Entry Points - Parse each file for externally callable, state-changing functions
5. Classify Access - Categorize each function by access level
6. Generate Report - Output structured markdown report

Slither Integration (Solidity)

For Solidity codebases, Slither can automatically extract entry points. Before manual analysis:

1. Check if Slither is Available

which slither

2. If Slither is Detected, Run Entry Points Printer

slither . --print entry-points

This outputs a table of all state-changing entry points with:

• Contract name
• Function name
• Visibility
• Modifiers applied

3. Use Slither Output as Foundation

• Parse the Slither output table to populate your analysis
• Cross-reference with manual inspection for access control classification
• Slither may miss some patterns (callbacks, dynamic access control)—supplement with manual review
• If Slither fails (compilation errors, unsupported features), fall back to manual analysis

4. When Slither is NOT Available

If which slither returns nothing, proceed with manual analysis using the language-specific reference files.

Language Detection

Extension	Language	Reference
.sol	Solidity	{baseDir}/references/solidity.md
.vy	Vyper	{baseDir}/references/vyper.md
.rs + Cargo.toml with solana-program	Solana (Rust)	{baseDir}/references/solana.md
.move + Move.toml with edition	{baseDir}/references/move-sui.md
.move + Move.toml with Aptos	{baseDir}/references/move-aptos.md
.fc, .func, .tact	TON (FunC/Tact)	{baseDir}/references/ton.md
.rs + Cargo.toml with cosmwasm-std	CosmWasm	{baseDir}/references/cosmwasm.md

Load the appropriate reference file(s) based on detected language before analysis.

Access Classification

Classify each state-changing entry point into one of these categories:

1. Public (Unrestricted)

Functions callable by anyone without restrictions.

2. Role-Restricted

Functions limited to specific roles. Common patterns to detect:

• Explicit role names: admin, owner, governance, guardian, operator, manager, minter, pauser, keeper, relayer, lender, borrower
• Role-checking patterns: onlyRole, hasRole, require(msg.sender == X), assert_owner, #[access_control]
• When role is ambiguous, flag as "Restricted (review required)" with the restriction pattern noted

3. Contract-Only (Internal Integration Points)

Functions callable only by other contracts, not by EOAs. Indicators:

• Callbacks: onERC721Received, uniswapV3SwapCallback, flashLoanCallback
• Interface implementations with contract-caller checks
• Functions that revert if tx.origin == msg.sender
• Cross-contract hooks

Output Format

Generate a markdown report with this structure:

# Entry Point Analysis: [Project Name]

**Analyzed**: [timestamp]
**Scope**: [directories analyzed or "full codebase"]
**Languages**: [detected languages]
**Focus**: State-changing functions only (view/pure excluded)

## Summary

| Category | Count |
|----------|-------|
| Public (Unrestricted) | X |
| Role-Restricted | X |
| Restricted (Review Required) | X |
| Contract-Only | X |
| **Total** | **X** |

---

## Public Entry Points (Unrestricted)

State-changing functions callable by anyone—prioritize for attack surface analysis.

| Function | File | Notes |
|----------|------|-------|
| `functionName(params)` | `path/to/file.sol:L42` | Brief note if relevant |

---

## Role-Restricted Entry Points

### Admin / Owner
| Function | File | Restriction |
|----------|------|-------------|
| `setFee(uint256)` | `Config.sol:L15` | `onlyOwner` |

### Governance
| Function | File | Restriction |
|----------|------|-------------|

### Guardian / Pauser
| Function | File | Restriction |
|----------|------|-------------|

### Other Roles
| Function | File | Restriction | Role |
|----------|------|-------------|------|

---

## Restricted (Review Required)

Functions with access control patterns that need manual verification.

| Function | File | Pattern | Why Review |
|----------|------|---------|------------|
| `execute(bytes)` | `Executor.sol:L88` | `require(trusted[msg.sender])` | Dynamic trust list |

---

## Contract-Only (Internal Integration Points)

Functions only callable by other contracts—useful for understanding trust boundaries.

| Function | File | Expected Caller |
|----------|------|-----------------|
| `onFlashLoan(...)` | `Vault.sol:L200` | Flash loan provider |

---

## Files Analyzed

- `path/to/file1.sol` (X state-changing entry points)
-  (X state-changing entry points)

Filtering

When user specifies a directory filter:

• Only analyze files within that path
• Note the filter in the report header
• Example: "Analyze only src/core/" → scope = src/core/

Analysis Guidelines

1. Be thorough: Don't skip files. Every state-changing externally callable function matters.
2. Be conservative: When uncertain about access level, flag for review rather than miscategorize.
3. Skip read-only: Exclude view, pure, and equivalent read-only functions.
4. Note inheritance: If a function's access control comes from a parent contract, note this.
5. Track modifiers: List all access-related modifiers/decorators applied to each function.
6. Identify patterns: Look for common patterns like:
   • Initializer functions (often unrestricted on first call)
   • Upgrade functions (high-privilege)
   • Emergency/pause functions (guardian-level)
   • Fee/parameter setters (admin-level)
   • Token transfers and approvals (often public)

Common Role Patterns by Protocol Type

Protocol Type	Common Roles
DEX	owner, feeManager, pairCreator
Lending	admin, guardian, liquidator, oracle
Governance	proposer, executor, canceller, timelock
NFT	minter, admin, royaltyReceiver
Bridge	relayer, guardian, validator, operator
Vault/Yield	strategist, keeper, harvester, manager

Rationalizations to Reject

When analyzing entry points, reject these shortcuts:

• "This function looks standard" → Still classify it; standard functions can have non-standard access control
• "The modifier name is clear" → Verify the modifier's actual implementation
• "This is obviously admin-only" → Trace the actual restriction; "obvious" assumptions miss subtle bypasses
• "I'll skip the callbacks" → Callbacks define trust boundaries; always include them
• "It doesn't modify much state" → Any state change can be exploited; include all non-view functions

Error Handling

If a file cannot be parsed:

1. Note it in the report under "Analysis Warnings"
2. Continue with remaining files
3. Suggest manual review for unparsable files