debate

Interview me until you have 95% confidence about what I actually want - not what I think I should want

Repositório: udayvunnam/skillz
Última atividade na origem: 3 de setembro de 2026 às 01:02
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md: inglês
Estrelas: 0
Forks: 0

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.

Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.

npx skills add https://github.com/udayvunnam/skillz --skill debate

O comando permanece em uma só linha. Role horizontalmente para revisá-lo antes de copiar.

Prefere uma cópia local? Baixe os arquivos disponíveis atualmente no SkillsMP.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

SKILL.md

Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura

Voltar à pesquisa Voltar à instalação

blogging

The user's writing workflow for posts and articles — mine fragments, order beats, shape prose, edit, cut, then publish and distribute. Runs as an ordered block list composing existing skills (writing-fragments, writing-beats, writing-shape, edit-article, clarity, illo, social). Use when the user asks to write a blog post or article, turn notes into a post, edit a draft, or run their writing workflow.

2026-09-03

design

The user's design workflow for UI and product surfaces — brief, direction, build, motion, polish, audit, hand off. An ordered block list composing the skills they actually reach for (debate, design-taste-frontend, impeccable, apple-design, svg-animations, better-ui, make-interfaces-feel-better, emil-design-eng) plus Figma MCP. Use when the user asks to design a screen, component, or interface, explore UI directions, polish a surface, add motion, or run their design workflow.

2026-09-03

github-review-twin

Reviews pull requests in the user's own GitHub review voice, as a deterministic pipeline of blocks (blocks.yaml) — ownership detection, nine mandatory gates, a judgement pass, then voice + ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English wording and short-post compression. Use when the user asks to review a PR, review code like them, draft or post PR comments, self-review their own PR, mine past GitHub review feedback, tune the review rules, sync AGENTS into the twin, add or skip a review block, or make reviews sound less AI-generated and more like their own style.

2026-09-03

Ver todas deste repositório

name	debate
description	Interview me until you have 95% confidence about what I actually want - not what I think I should want

Debate

Do not implement yet. Interview until 95% confident what the user actually wants.

Skip on mechanical instructions ("rename X to Y"), resumed work, or "just do it".

Probe. Read the code first, then ask 2-3 questions it can't answer. Scope, real problem, constraints, done-criteria. Each must force a concrete answer, not "tell me more". Use AskUserQuestion when the answers are a small set of options.
Challenge. Name one assumption that might be wrong, or a better problem to solve. Well-scoped already? Say so, skip. Don't manufacture friction.
Confirm. One "here's what I'll do" — scope, approach, what's excluded. Yes/no. Correction loops back to 2.

Max 3 rounds. Not at 95%? State what's unclear, state your assumption, proceed.

Be direct — no "great question". Fewer sharp questions beat many mediocre ones. Name the constraint the user is dancing around.

debate

Informações da origem

Opções de instalação

Revise os arquivos de origem

Mais deste repositório

Mais deste repositório

Debate

Debate