Skip to main content

best-api

Design, review or repair a Plate public call shape using live Slate-based contracts, ideal call sites, inference and ownership.

Informações da origem

Repositório
udecode/plate
Última atividade na origem
12 de outubro de 2026 às 22:51
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
16.655
Forks
994

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
description
Design, review or repair a Plate public call shape using live Slate-based contracts, ideal call sites, inference and ownership.
argument-hint
[design | review | repair] <API, diff or plan>
name
best-api
metadata
{"skiller":{"source":".agents/rules/best-api.mdc"}}
# Best API Own the public call-site decision. `VISION.md` owns product direction; `verdict` decides whether the direction earns work. The Plan playbook owns adoption and its review gates. Read public types, exports, runtime owners, representative consumers and docs. Inspect local dependency source and prior art before inventing an abstraction. Show the normal call and one real customization using actual public imports. Classify every noun by its honest package, registry or application owner. Compare keeping, deleting, merging, inlining and replacing. Keep a boundary only for an independent current job or a correctness, security, serialized data, native behavior or runtime law. Prefer one obvious common path with inference, useful JSDoc and progressive disclosure. Implementation difficulty does not establish good API design; published compatibility still needs an explicit adoption decision in this stable checkout. A runtime cost argument requires `benchmark`'s matched pre-acceptance probe. A type-only decision can record N/A with source evidence. A short call that hides the wrong owner is not an accepted design. For review, rank concrete findings P0 through P3 and give one recommended target with source, consumers, rejected alternatives and proof. A read-only review reports the repair and implements nothing. For an authorized repair, update the owning contract and every live example, doc, skill and check that teaches it. Search the old names and their word variants with `git grep --untracked`; distinguish release history from current teaching. Check Chinese twins, regenerate owned output and forward-test the real call. Keep unresolved public API teaching open in the plan.
Ver no GitHub