| name | conductor |
| description | Use when the user explicitly asks for Conductor, wants track/spec/plan/review artifacts on disk, or needs long-lived project context management. Prefer start-dev for small or one-off tasks. If Conductor is not configured in the project, start with setup. |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| source | fork |
| checksum | adf8bf4bc4f26b82d39d35ce6699ecd65504ead8143a243de1e0c59cc3b03620 |
| updated_at | "2026-05-29T03:50:00.000Z" |
| intent | execution |
| layer | orchestration |
Conductor
Conductor is a Context-Driven Development (CDD) workflow for managing durable project context on disk. The working loop is:
Refresh -> Spec -> Plan -> Implement -> Review -> Reconcile
This skill is the Codex-native adaptation of the upstream Conductor repository. Keep the workflow compatible with upstream concepts, but translate execution into Codex conventions instead of copying upstream-only behavior literally.
When To Use
Use Conductor when the user wants:
- persistent artifacts under
conductor/
- a track with
spec.md and plan.md
- a governed multi-step implementation flow
- a lightweight preflight summary before important work
- review/cleanup/archive operations tied to the track lifecycle
Use start-dev instead when the task is small, one-off, or does not need new artifacts on disk.
Native Subagent Protocol (Codex)
Codex supports native subagents. Delegate with spawn_agent, coordinate with send_input, collect via wait, and clean up with close_agent.
Execution preference:
- Use native subagents first for independent workstreams (parallel when possible).
- Merge results in main thread and run final verification.
- Fallback only when delegation is blocked: use the
[ANALYST]/[ARCHITECT]/[EXECUTOR]/[REVIEWER] structure in a single response.
Minimal orchestration pattern:
spawn_agent -> send_input (optional) -> wait -> close_agent
Upstream Alignment (Conductor)
When adapting or extending this skill, inspect the upstream repository as a protocol bundle, not just the README. The highest-value upstream files are:
- upstream project instruction files
- upstream extension metadata
policies/conductor.toml
commands/conductor/*.toml
templates/workflow.md
Preserve these upstream ideas when they improve Codex behavior:
conductor/ is the default plan directory
- commands are protocol files; read the TOML
prompt field before executing
- review is a first-class command, not an afterthought
- file resolution should work from semantic names, not only hard-coded paths
- implementation and verification should prefer isolated review contexts when possible
The compatibility boundary for this skill is defined in:
docs/CONDUCTOR_V2_COMPATIBILITY_CONTRACT.md
Universal File Resolution Protocol (Codex Adaptation)
Before using Conductor files, resolve them in this order:
- If the project contains upstream metadata such as project instruction files, extension metadata, or
policies/conductor.toml, read those first and honor their plan-directory declarations.
- Otherwise, default to the fixed
conductor/ directory.
- Resolve semantic aliases as follows:
- Tracks Registry ->
conductor/tracks.md
- Product Definition ->
conductor/product.md
- Product Guidelines ->
conductor/product-guidelines.md
- Tech Stack ->
conductor/tech-stack.md
- Workflow ->
conductor/workflow.md
- Track Folder ->
conductor/tracks/<track_id>/
- Archive ->
conductor/archive/
- Temp Workspace ->
conductor/tmp/
- Code Styleguides ->
conductor/code_styleguides/
If the user asks for a custom artifact path, state that Conductor defaults to conductor/ and either:
- proceed with the default directory, or
- pause for a deliberate protocol refactor
Core Concepts
- Track: A unit of work (feature or bug fix) with its own spec and plan
- Spec: Detailed requirements document (
spec.md)
- Plan: Phased task list with checkboxes (
plan.md)
- Workflow: Rules for task lifecycle, TDD, commits, and quality gates
Directory Structure
When initialized, Conductor creates this structure in the project:
conductor/
├── product.md # Product vision and goals
├── product-guidelines.md # UX/brand guidelines
├── tech-stack.md # Technology choices
├── workflow.md # Development workflow rules
├── tracks.md # Master list of all tracks
├── code_styleguides/ # Language-specific style guides
├── tracks/ # Active tracks
│ └── <track_id>/
│ ├── metadata.json
│ ├── spec.md
│ └── plan.md
└── archive/ # Completed tracks
Available Commands
| Command | Purpose |
|---|
| Setup | Initialize Conductor in a project (new or existing) |
| Refresh | Refresh the facts layer from code, config, and git state |
| New Track | Create a new feature/bug track with spec and plan |
| Implement | Execute tasks from a track's plan following TDD workflow |
| Review | Review a track or current changes against spec, plan, workflow, and code guidelines |
| Status | Show progress overview of all tracks |
| Revert | Git-aware rollback of tracks, phases, or tasks |
Protocol References
The detailed protocols are in TOML format. Read the prompt field from each file:
| Action | Protocol File |
|---|
| Setup project | commands/conductor/setup.toml |
| Refresh facts | commands/conductor/refresh.toml |
| Create new track | commands/conductor/newTrack.toml |
| Implement tasks | commands/conductor/implement.toml |
| Review implementation | commands/conductor/review.toml |
| Check status | commands/conductor/status.toml |
| Revert changes | commands/conductor/revert.toml |
How to read: Each .toml file has a prompt field containing the full protocol instructions.
Task Status Markers
[ ] - Pending
[~] - In Progress
[x] - Completed
Key Workflow Principles
- The Plan is Source of Truth: All work tracked in
plan.md
- Test-Driven Development: Write tests before implementing
- High Code Coverage: Target >80% coverage
- Commit After Each Task: With git notes for traceability
- Phase Checkpoints: Manual verification at phase completion
When to Use Each Protocol
- "set up conductor" or "initialize project" -> Read
commands/conductor/setup.toml
- "refresh", "sync current context", "update conductor facts" -> Read
commands/conductor/refresh.toml
- "new feature", "new track", "plan a feature" -> Read
commands/conductor/newTrack.toml
- "implement", "start working", "next task" -> Read
commands/conductor/implement.toml
- "review", "audit", "check this track" -> Read
commands/conductor/review.toml
- "status", "progress", "where are we" -> Read
commands/conductor/status.toml
- "revert", "undo", "rollback" -> Read
commands/conductor/revert.toml
- If the user does not mention Conductor and the task is small -> Use
start-dev instead
Assets
- Code Styleguides:
templates/code_styleguides/ (general, go, python, javascript, typescript, html-css)
- Workflow Template:
templates/workflow.md
Critical Rules
- Validate every tool call - If any fails, halt and report to user
- Check setup first - Resolve and verify the required Conductor files before any operation
- Codex-first interaction - Prefer reasonable assumptions; ask one concise blocking question only when necessary
- Plain-language UX - Do not suggest slash commands. Tell the user what to ask for directly in natural language
- Codex-native delegation - Replace upstream-only flows such as
ask_user or isolated CLI shells with Codex chat, native subagents, and local commands