with one click
oss-hunter
Automatically hunt for high-impact OSS contribution opportunities in trending repositories.
Menu
Automatically hunt for high-impact OSS contribution opportunities in trending repositories.
| name | oss-hunter |
| description | Automatically hunt for high-impact OSS contribution opportunities in trending repositories. |
| risk | safe |
| source | https://github.com/jackjin1997/ClawForge |
| date_added | 2026-02-27 |
A precision skill for agents to find, analyze, and strategize for high-impact Open Source contributions. This skill helps you become a top-tier contributor by identifying the most "mergeable" and influential issues in trending repositories.
Ask your agent:
When hunting for contributions, the agent follows this multi-stage protocol:
Use web_search or gh api to find trending repositories.
Focus on:
Search for specific labels:
help-wantedgood-first-issuebugv1 / roadmapgh issue list --repo owner/repo --label "help wanted" --limit 10
Analyze the issue:
Generate a structured report for the human:
gh CLI or web_search tools.Build a better hunter by adding new heuristics to Phase 3. Submit your improvements to the ClawForge.
Powered by OpenClaw & ClawForge.
Use when CrossFrame Suite routes explicit Chinese casebook work: turning materials into reusable cases, anonymized entries, mechanisms, and retrieval indexes.
Use only when the user explicitly names crossframe-critical for a Chinese structural critique dossier, article plan, or long-form critical essay.
Use when CrossFrame Suite routes explicit Chinese proposition testing, debate analysis, hidden-premise review, rebuttal design, or withdrawal condition checks.
Use when CrossFrame Suite routes explicit Chinese reader replies, editor responses, consultation-style short answers, or boundary-aware structural advice.
Use when explicit CrossFrame work needs a Chinese critical insight essay, commentary, concept essay, public piece, or structure-to-article draft after diagnosis.
Use when CrossFrame Suite routes explicit Chinese notes for books, theories, articles, excerpts, bidirectional reading, absorption, or conflict mapping.