菜单
Deep competitive analysis: map competitors, find gaps, understand strategy, benchmark offering. Focused dissection vs broad landscape. Trigger: analyze competitors, competitive analysis, how beat them.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/1337hero/skills --skill competitive-analysis命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Guide for creating or updating skills. Use when extending Claude with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.
Read and post to Twitter/X via the `bird` CLI — tweets, threads, search, timelines, bookmarks, follows, lists, media.
Set up and maintain bookkeeping for solopreneur. Track income/expenses, manage invoices, reconcile accounts, generate reports. Software, chart of accounts, categorization. Not professional. Trigger: bookkeeping, accounting, track expenses.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | competitive-analysis |
| description | Deep competitive analysis: map competitors, find gaps, understand strategy, benchmark offering. Focused dissection vs broad landscape. Trigger: analyze competitors, competitive analysis, how beat them. |
Shallow competitive research (checking a few websites) is not enough. This playbook gives you a systematic way to dissect competitors across strategy, product, pricing, marketing, operations, and reviews — then synthesise findings into exploitable gaps and a positioning wedge.
Not all competitors are equal. Categorize them before diving in.
Direct competitors: Solve the exact same problem for the exact same customer. These are your primary benchmarks.
Indirect competitors: Solve a related problem or serve the same customer with a different solution. These matter because your customer is choosing between ALL of them (including doing nothing).
Aspirational competitors: Not in your niche yet, but could be. Larger or more established players who might expand into your space. Monitor these — they reveal what "winning at scale" looks like.
Identify 3-5 direct, 2-3 indirect, and 1-2 aspirational. You don't need to deep-dive all of them — focus your deepest analysis on your top 3 direct competitors.
For each competitor you're deep-diving, collect data across these six layers:
This is where you find gold. Read 20+ reviews per competitor across:
Categorize every complaint you find:
Also note what users praise most — these are the table stakes you must match.
After gathering data, create a side-by-side matrix. Columns = competitors (+ your planned offering). Rows = the dimensions that matter most to your target customer.
Pick 8-12 rows that are decision-relevant. Examples:
Fill in each cell with what you know. Leave gaps where you genuinely don't know — gaps in your knowledge are research tasks, not guesses.
From your matrix and review analysis, identify your top 3 exploitable gaps. A gap is exploitable when ALL of these are true:
For each exploitable gap, write:
Your "wedge" is the single, sharp angle you enter the market on. It's not "we're better at everything." It's "we are the only option that does [specific thing] for [specific person]."
Wedge formula:
"The only [product category] that [does specific thing] for [specific customer type]."
Examples:
Test your wedge:
Once you have a wedge, sharpen how you express it and how you compare against each competitor in the wild.
Compare competitor messaging side-by-side across the dimensions buyers actually evaluate:
| Dimension | You | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core value proposition | ||||
| Primary CTA | ||||
| Hero headline | ||||
| Tone/voice | ||||
| Key differentiator claim | ||||
| Social proof type | ||||
| Category framing | ||||
| Target audience signal |
The whitespace in this matrix is your messaging opportunity.
For each competitor, reconstruct the story they're telling:
| Element | What to identify | Where to look |
|---|---|---|
| Villain | The problem or enemy they position against | Homepage hero, "why us" page — what status quo do they attack? |
| Hero | Who's the hero in their story | Case studies, testimonials — is the customer the hero, or the product? |
| Transformation | The before/after they promise | Results pages, outcomes language |
| Stakes | What happens if you don't act | Risk messaging, urgency, FOMO/loss framing |
An unclaimed villain or an over-claimed villain is a positioning opening.
Plot competitors on dimension pairs that buyers care about. Pick axes that are meaningful, differentiating, and independent.
Common axis pairs:
| X-axis | Y-axis | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Capability | Market tiers |
| Ease of use | Power | UX/capability tradeoffs |
| SMB focus ↔ Enterprise | Point solution ↔ Platform | Segment gaps |
| Established ↔ Innovative | Niche ↔ Broad | Market entry timing |
Look for empty quadrants (opportunity), weak-competitor zones (displacement), and crowded clusters (avoid or reframe).
Reverse-engineer each competitor's implicit positioning:
For [target audience], [product] is the [category] that [key benefit] because [reason to believe].
Then draft yours using the same template — refined by your wedge and tested against the "Only We" rule: if a competitor could truthfully make the same claim, it's not a true differentiator.
For each major competitor, maintain a 2-3 page battlecard: their pitch, strengths (be honest), weaknesses, your differentiators, feature/pricing comparison, objection handling, landmine questions, win/loss themes. Update quarterly.
Competition doesn't stop once you launch. Set up a lightweight monitoring routine: