| name | videoauto-r1-adaptive-video-reasoning |
| title | VideoAuto-R1: Video Auto Reasoning via Thinking Once, Answering Twice |
| version | 0.0.2 |
| engine | skillxiv-v0.0.2-claude-opus-4.6 |
| license | MIT |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05175 |
| keywords | ["Video Understanding","Adaptive Reasoning","Efficiency","Multi-modal LLMs"] |
| description | Reduce inference latency and token cost in video question-answering by selectively invoking chain-of-thought reasoning. VideoAuto-R1 uses confidence-based early-exit to determine when explicit reasoning is necessary, achieving 3.3× response length reduction while maintaining state-of-the-art accuracy. |
When to Use This Skill
- Video understanding tasks with mixed perception and reasoning needs
- Applications requiring efficient inference (reduced token generation)
- Scenarios where reasoning quality matters more than speed
- Tasks combining perception (MVBench) and reasoning (VideoMMMU)
- Real-time video QA with computational constraints
When NOT to Use This Skill
- All tasks equally require step-by-step reasoning
- Output length minimization is less important than accuracy
- Applications needing guaranteed reasoning traces for auditability
- Domains where skipping reasoning increases error rates significantly
Problem Summary
Chain-of-thought reasoning in video understanding produces detailed step-by-step analyses, but often underperforms or merely matches direct answering while incurring 2-3× computational overhead. This creates a fundamental inefficiency: perception-heavy tasks (detecting objects, describing scenes) benefit minimally from reasoning, while reasoning-intensive tasks (causal inference, counting across frames) require detailed intermediate steps. Existing approaches treat reasoning as always-on, wasting computation on tasks that don't need it.
Solution: Think When Necessary Framework
Train models to generate initial answers, evaluate confidence, and only invoke reasoning when necessary.
class VideoAutoR1:
def __init__(self, base_model):
self.model = base_model
def forward_with_adaptive_reasoning(self, video, question):
"""Generate initial answer, then decide on reasoning"""
initial_logits = self.model.generate_initial_answer(video, question)
initial_answer = sample_from_logits(initial_logits)
initial_logprobs = get_token_logprobs(initial_logits)
confidence_score = initial_logprobs.mean()
confidence_normalized = confidence_score / sqrt(len(initial_answer))
threshold =
confidence_normalized > threshold:
initial_answer, reasoning_trace=
:
reasoning_trace = .model.generate_reasoning(
video, question, initial_answer
)
refined_answer = .model.generate_refined_answer(
video, question, reasoning_trace
)
refined_answer, reasoning_trace=reasoning_trace
():
batch dataset:
video, question, gold_answer = batch
initial_answer = .model.generate_initial_answer(video, question)
reasoning_trace = .model.generate_reasoning(
video, question, initial_answer
)
refined_answer = .model.generate_refined_answer(
video, question, reasoning_trace
)
initial_correctness = (initial_answer == gold_answer)
refined_correctness = (refined_answer == gold_answer)
reward_initial = initial_correctness *
reward_refined = refined_correctness * + fallback_bonus
loss = compute_policy_gradient_loss(
[reward_initial, reward_refined],
weights=[, ]
)
loss.backward()