| name | writing-agent-relay-workflows |
| description | Use when building multi-agent workflows with relay broker-sdk. Covers conversation vs pipeline coordination, WorkflowBuilder/DAG steps, agents, {{steps.X.output}} chaining, repairable verification gates, evidence-based completion, mandatory Claude-then-Codex fresh-eyes review/fix loops with test hardening, channels, chat-native recipes, error handling, event listeners, step sizing, lead+workers teams, and parallel waves. |
Overview
The relay broker-sdk workflow system orchestrates multiple AI agents (Claude, Codex, Gemini, Aider, Goose) through typed DAG-based workflows. Workflows can be written in TypeScript (preferred), Python, or YAML.
Language preference: TypeScript > Python > YAML. Use TypeScript unless the project is Python-only or a simple config-driven workflow suits YAML.
Pattern selection: Do not default to dag blindly. If the job needs a different swarm/workflow type, consult the choosing-swarm-patterns skill when available and select the pattern that best matches the coordination problem.
When to Use
- Building multi-agent workflows with step dependencies
- Orchestrating different AI CLIs (claude, codex, gemini, aider, goose)
- Creating DAG, pipeline, fan-out, or other swarm patterns
- Needing verification gates, retries, or step output chaining
- Designing product-contract workflows where failing checks should route to agents for repair instead of stopping the run
- Dynamic channel management: agents joining/leaving/muting channels mid-workflow
Non-Negotiable Workflow Checklist
Every generated workflow should satisfy this checklist before it is considered complete:
- Start with a deterministic, resumable preflight for repository state, credentials, and declared write scope.
- Pick the coordination shape deliberately: Conversation for non-trivial coordination, Pipeline only for linear one-shot handoffs.
- Use repairable validation gates: capture red output with
failOnError: false, hand it to a repair owner, then rerun the same check.
- Run the mandatory fresh-eyes loops in order: Claude review/fix/final review/final fix, then Codex review/fix/final review/final fix.
- Require review fixers to add or update appropriate tests, fixtures, assertions, or deterministic proofs for testable findings.
- Run final deterministic acceptance after the Codex loop and before commit, PR creation, or handoff.
- If a real blocker remains, write
BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT with exact evidence and skip commit/PR creation instead of crashing the workflow.
- If the workflow owns shipping, model branch, commit, push, PR creation, and PR URL verification as explicit deterministic steps.
Default Principle: Workflows Repair Before They Fail
- Run deterministic checks as evidence-capturing gates with
captureOutput: true.
- Prefer
failOnError: false for intermediate validation gates so the workflow can pass the output to a repair agent.
- Add a repair step immediately after each red-prone gate. The repair agent reads
{{steps.<gate>.output}}, fixes source/tests/config, reruns the same command locally, and exits only after the gate is green or the blocker is external.
- Keep final acceptance deterministic, but still put an agent repair step before commit/PR creation. If the repair budget is exhausted or a true external blocker remains, write a blocked artifact and skip commit/PR creation; do not let the workflow end as
FAILED.
- Use
.reliable() or .repairable() on SDK versions that support it, especially for product-contract workflows. As of AgentWorkforce/relay#827, retry-mode workflows with agents are repair-aware by default, repair agents run before retrying malformed/failed agent steps, and the SDK covers DAG, pipeline, fan-out, worktree-backed, deterministic-only, and agent-plus-gate shapes.
Mandatory Fresh-Eyes Review Loops
Every workflow must include two comprehensive fresh-eyes review/fix loops before final acceptance, commit, PR creation, or handoff: first Claude, then Codex. This applies even to small workflows and even when deterministic tests pass. Tests prove commands passed; the fresh-eyes loops make independent agents read the actual resulting files and artifacts as if they did not author them.
verdict: FINDINGS | NO_ISSUES_FOUND | BLOCKED
finding_id: short stable id
severity: blocker | high | medium | low
file: path/to/file
issue: what is wrong
fix_required: concrete change needed
test_required: test, fixture, assertion, or proof command needed
status: open | fixed | wontfix | blocked
evidence: commands run, file paths, or blocker details
Choose Your Coordination Style — Conversation vs Pipeline
Before writing the workflow, decide how the agents will coordinate. The relay primitive supports two very different shapes, and picking the wrong one wastes the most valuable thing the SDK gives you.
| Shape | What it is | Use when |
|---|
| Conversation (chat-native) | Interactive agents share a channel; messages, @-mentions, and ambient awareness drive coordination. Lead and workers spawn in parallel and self-organize. The relay is the coordination layer, not just transport. | Multi-file work, peer review loops, cross-agent feedback, dynamic re-planning, multi-PR coordination, anything with a human-in-the-loop escape, swarms where workers pick up each other's output. |
| Pipeline (one-shot DAG) | Each step runs as a one-shot subprocess (claude -p, codex exec); steps hand off via {{steps.X.output}} text injection. No agents are alive at the same time; no chat happens. | Linear, well-specified transformations; deterministic data passing; no live agent-to-agent coordination during implementation. The mandatory final Claude-then-Codex review/fix loops still apply. |
Default to Conversation for any non-trivial work. Pipeline DAGs are simpler to reason about but they do not exercise the relay primitive — they are a Unix pipe with extra steps. If you would happily write the same task as a single shell pipeline, pipeline-shape is fine. Otherwise, you almost certainly want a Conversation shape.
The two shapes can mix within one workflow: pipeline-style deterministic preflight → conversation in the middle → pipeline-style commit-and-PR at the end. See Quick Reference (Conversation) below and Common Patterns → Interactive Team for the canonical recipe.
A blunt rule of thumb: if your workflow only uses agent steps with preset: 'worker' chained by {{steps.X.output}}, you are not using the relay — you are using claude -p | codex exec. That may still be the right answer; just make it a deliberate choice.
Quick Reference (Pipeline shape)
> Use this when steps are linear, well-specified, and need no agent-to-agent feedback. For anything with iteration, review, or coordination, jump to Quick Reference (Conversation shape) below.
import { workflow } from '@agent-relay/sdk/workflows';
async function runWorkflow() {
const result = await workflow('my-workflow')
.description('What this workflow does')
.pattern('dag')
.channel('wf-my-workflow')
.maxConcurrency(3)
.timeout(3_600_000)
.repairable()
.agent('lead', { cli: 'claude', role: 'Architect', retries: 2 })
.agent('worker', { cli: 'codex', role: 'Implementer', retries: 2 })
.agent('claude-reviewer', { cli: 'claude', role: 'First-pass fresh-eyes reviewer', retries: 1, preset: 'reviewer' })
.agent('claude-fixer', { cli: 'claude', role: 'First-pass review-finding fixer', retries: 2 })
.agent('codex-reviewer', { cli: 'codex', role: 'Second-pass fresh-eyes reviewer', retries: 1, preset: 'reviewer' })
.agent('codex-fixer', { cli: 'codex', role: 'Review-finding fixer', retries: 2 })
.step('preflight', {
type: 'deterministic',
command: 'git rev-parse --show-toplevel >/dev/null && echo PREFLIGHT_OK',
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: true,
})
.step('plan', {
agent: 'lead',
dependsOn: ['preflight'],
task: `Analyze the codebase and produce a plan.`,
retries: 2,
verification: { type: 'output_contains', value: 'PLAN_COMPLETE' },
})
.step('implement', {
agent: 'worker',
task: `Implement based on this plan:\n{{steps.plan.output}}`,
dependsOn: ['plan'],
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('claude-review', {
agent: 'claude-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['implement'],
task: `Fresh-eyes review the completed workflow output. Read the actual files, diff, repo rules, and available evidence.
Write findings to .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/claude-review.md.
If there are no actionable issues, write NO_ISSUES_FOUND.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('claude-fix', {
agent: 'claude-fixer',
dependsOn: ['claude-review'],
task: `Read .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/claude-review.md.
Fix every valid issue, add or update appropriate tests/proofs for the fix, rerun relevant checks, and update .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/claude-fix.md.
If the review says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, record that no fix was needed.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('claude-review-final', {
agent: 'claude-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['claude-fix'],
task: `Fresh-eyes review the post-fix state from scratch. Do not rely on the prior review or fix summary.
Write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/claude-review-final.md with either actionable findings or NO_ISSUES_FOUND.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('claude-fix-final', {
agent: 'claude-fixer',
dependsOn: ['claude-review-final'],
task: `If .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/claude-review-final.md contains findings, fix them, add or update appropriate tests/proofs, and rerun relevant checks.
If no fix is possible, write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md with exact evidence.
If it says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, record Claude review signoff.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('codex-review', {
agent: 'codex-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['claude-fix-final'],
task: `Second-pass fresh-eyes review of the post-Claude-fix state. Read the actual files, diff, repo rules, and available evidence.
Write findings to .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/codex-review.md.
If there are no actionable issues, write NO_ISSUES_FOUND.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('codex-fix', {
agent: 'codex-fixer',
dependsOn: ['codex-review'],
task: `Read .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/codex-review.md.
Fix every valid issue, add or update appropriate tests/proofs for the fix, rerun relevant checks, and update .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/codex-fix.md.
If the review says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, record that no fix was needed.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('codex-review-final', {
agent: 'codex-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['codex-fix'],
task: `Fresh-eyes review the post-Codex-fix state from scratch. Do not rely on the prior review or fix summary.
Write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/codex-review-final.md with either actionable findings or NO_ISSUES_FOUND.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('codex-fix-final', {
agent: 'codex-fixer',
dependsOn: ['codex-review-final'],
task: `If .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/codex-review-final.md contains findings, fix them, add or update appropriate tests/proofs, and rerun relevant checks.
If no fix is possible, write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md with exact evidence.
If it says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, record final review signoff.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('acceptance-after-review', {
type: 'deterministic',
dependsOn: ['codex-fix-final'],
command: 'test ! -f .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md && echo ACCEPTANCE_OK',
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: true,
})
.onError('retry', { maxRetries: 2, retryDelayMs: 10_000 })
.run({ cwd: process.cwd() });
console.log('Result:', result.status);
}
runWorkflow().catch((error) => {
console.error(error);
process.exit(1);
});
Quick Reference (Conversation shape)
> Use this for any non-trivial work — peer review, multi-file edits, cross-agent feedback, dynamic re-planning. Lead and workers spawn in parallel on a shared channel and self-organize via messages. The relay primitive does the coordinating; verification gates downstream of the lead close the workflow.
import { workflow } from '@agent-relay/sdk/workflows';
import { ClaudeModels, CodexModels } from '@agent-relay/config';
async function runWorkflow() {
const result = await workflow('my-workflow')
.description('Multi-file change with peer review')
.pattern('dag')
.channel('wf-my-feature')
.maxConcurrency(4)
.timeout(3_600_000)
.repairable()
.agent('lead', {
cli: 'claude',
model: ClaudeModels.OPUS,
role: 'Architect + reviewer. Plans, assigns, reviews, posts feedback.',
retries: 1,
})
.agent('impl-a', {
cli: 'codex',
model: CodexModels.GPT_5_4,
role: 'Implementer. Listens on channel for assignments and feedback.',
retries: 2,
})
.agent('impl-b', {
cli: 'codex',
model: CodexModels.GPT_5_4,
role: 'Implementer. Listens on channel for assignments and feedback.',
retries: 2,
})
.agent('claude-reviewer', {
cli: 'claude',
model: ClaudeModels.OPUS,
preset: 'reviewer',
role: 'First-pass fresh-eyes reviewer. Reads the final diff and artifacts from scratch.',
retries: 1,
})
.agent('claude-fixer', {
cli: 'claude',
model: ClaudeModels.SONNET,
role: 'First-pass review-finding fixer. Repairs valid findings, adds tests/proofs, and reruns checks.',
retries: 2,
})
.agent('codex-reviewer', {
cli: 'codex',
model: CodexModels.GPT_5_4,
preset: 'reviewer',
role: 'Second-pass fresh-eyes reviewer. Reviews the post-Claude-fix state from scratch.',
retries: 1,
})
.agent('codex-fixer', {
cli: 'codex',
model: CodexModels.GPT_5_4,
role: 'Review-finding fixer. Repairs valid findings, adds tests/proofs, and reruns checks.',
retries: 2,
})
.step('preflight', {
type: 'deterministic',
command: 'git rev-parse --show-toplevel >/dev/null && echo PREFLIGHT_OK',
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: true,
})
.step('context', {
type: 'deterministic',
dependsOn: ['preflight'],
command: 'git ls-files src/',
captureOutput: true,
})
.step('lead-coordinate', {
agent: 'lead',
dependsOn: ['context'],
task: `You are the lead on #wf-my-feature. Workers: impl-a, impl-b.
Post the plan. Assign files. Review their PRs/diffs. Post feedback in-channel.
Workers iterate based on your feedback. Exit when both files pass review.`,
})
.step('impl-a-work', {
agent: 'impl-a',
dependsOn: ['context'],
task: `You are impl-a on #wf-my-feature. Wait for the lead's plan.
Implement your assigned file. Post a completion message. Address feedback.`,
})
.step('impl-b-work', {
agent: 'impl-b',
dependsOn: ['context'],
task: `You are impl-b on #wf-my-feature. Wait for the lead's plan.
Implement your assigned file. Post a completion message. Address feedback.`,
})
.step('verify', {
type: 'deterministic',
dependsOn: ['lead-coordinate'],
command: 'npm run typecheck && npm test 2>&1',
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: false,
})
.step('repair-verify', {
agent: 'lead',
dependsOn: ['verify'],
task: `If verification passed, summarize evidence.
If it failed, use this output to assign and fix issues, then rerun the command until green:
{{steps.verify.output}}`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('verify-final', {
type: 'deterministic',
dependsOn: ['repair-verify'],
command: 'npm run typecheck && npm test 2>&1',
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: false,
})
.step('claude-review', {
agent: 'claude-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['verify-final'],
task: `First-pass fresh-eyes review of the post-implementation state.
Read the actual changed files, git diff, repo instructions, task spec, and verification output:
{{steps.verify-final.output}}
Write .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/claude-review.md with:
- actionable findings, each with file paths and required fix
- or NO_ISSUES_FOUND if there are no remaining issues`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('claude-fix', {
agent: 'claude-fixer',
dependsOn: ['claude-review'],
task: `Read .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/claude-review.md.
If there are findings, fix every valid one and add or update appropriate tests/proofs. After each fix, rerun the relevant check and review the changed files again.
Keep iterating locally until this round has no remaining valid issues.
Write .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/claude-fix.md with fixes and commands run.
If the review says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, write that no fix was needed.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('claude-review-final', {
agent: 'claude-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['claude-fix'],
task: `Perform a fresh post-fix review from scratch. Do not rely on previous review text or the fixer's summary.
Read files, diff, repo rules, task spec, and evidence. Write .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/claude-review-final.md.
Use NO_ISSUES_FOUND only if there are no actionable issues left.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('claude-fix-final', {
agent: 'claude-fixer',
dependsOn: ['claude-review-final'],
task: `If the final Claude review found issues, fix them, add or update appropriate tests/proofs, and rerun the relevant checks until green.
If no fix is possible, write .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md with exact evidence and do not commit.
If the final review says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, record signoff in .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/claude-signoff.md.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('verify-after-claude-review', {
type: 'deterministic',
dependsOn: ['claude-fix-final'],
command: 'test ! -f .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md && npm run typecheck && npm test 2>&1',
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: false,
})
.step('codex-review', {
agent: 'codex-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['verify-after-claude-review'],
task: `Second-pass fresh-eyes review of the post-Claude-fix state.
Read the actual changed files, git diff, repo instructions, task spec, and verification output:
{{steps.verify-after-claude-review.output}}
Write .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/codex-review.md with:
- actionable findings, each with file paths and required fix
- or NO_ISSUES_FOUND if there are no remaining issues`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('codex-fix', {
agent: 'codex-fixer',
dependsOn: ['codex-review'],
task: `Read .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/codex-review.md.
If there are findings, fix every valid one and add or update appropriate tests/proofs. After each fix, rerun the relevant check and review the changed files again.
Keep iterating locally until this round has no remaining valid issues.
Write .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/codex-fix.md with fixes and commands run.
If the review says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, write that no fix was needed.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('codex-review-final', {
agent: 'codex-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['codex-fix'],
task: `Perform a fresh post-Codex-fix review from scratch. Do not rely on previous review text or the fixer's summary.
Read files, diff, repo rules, task spec, and evidence. Write .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/codex-review-final.md.
Use NO_ISSUES_FOUND only if there are no actionable issues left.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('codex-fix-final', {
agent: 'codex-fixer',
dependsOn: ['codex-review-final'],
task: `If the final Codex review found issues, fix them, add or update appropriate tests/proofs, and rerun the relevant checks until green.
If no fix is possible, write .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md with exact evidence and do not commit.
If the final review says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, record signoff in .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/codex-signoff.md.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('verify-after-review', {
type: 'deterministic',
dependsOn: ['codex-fix-final'],
command: 'test ! -f .workflow-artifacts/my-feature/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md && npm run typecheck && npm test 2>&1',
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: true,
})
.onError('retry', { maxRetries: 2, retryDelayMs: 10_000 })
.run({ cwd: process.cwd() });
console.log('Result:', result.status);
}
runWorkflow().catch((error) => {
console.error(error);
process.exit(1);
});
Default For Serious Implementation: Shadowed Squad Review Loop
- implementer: owns a tight file/subsystem scope and writes the change
- shadow reviewer: follows the implementer in real time, checks drift against the spec, and leaves feedback early
- optional validation owner: owns tests, dry-run proof, or fixture coverage when that is a separate deliverable
- Deterministically read the spec, AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md, workflow standards, recent local docs, and declared file targets.
- Lead splits work into bounded squads with non-overlapping ownership.
- Squads run in parallel. The shadow reads actual files and channel updates, then posts feedback while the implementer is still active.
- Each implementer writes a self-reflection artifact before external review. It must answer: what changed, what spec items are satisfied, what tests/proofs ran, what risks remain, and how the work follows repo rules.
- A fresh self-review agent reads the post-implementation files, recent local conventions, AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md, and related rules. It should not rely on the implementer's summary.
- The implementer gets that feedback and performs a repair pass.
- Deterministic gates run with captured output. Red output goes to a repair owner, then the same gate reruns.
- Run the mandatory fresh-eyes review loops in sequence: Claude reviews the actual final diff and artifacts, a fixer repairs findings and hardens them with appropriate tests/proofs, Claude reviews the post-fix state again, then Codex repeats the same cycle from scratch over the post-Claude-fix state.
- Optional extra reviewers can be added for high-stakes work, but they do not replace the sequential Claude-then-Codex loops.
- Final signoff only happens after post-Codex-fix review and final deterministic gates prove the spec is complete, or a blocker artifact explains why it cannot be completed.
- Critical TypeScript rules:
- Check the project's
package.json for "type": "module" — if ESM, use import; if CJS, use require(). In both cases, wrap execution in an async function instead of raw top-level await.
agent-relay run <file.ts> executes the file as a standalone subprocess — it does NOT inspect exports. The file MUST call .run().- Use
.run({ cwd: process.cwd() }) — createWorkflowRenderer does not exist
- Validate with
--dry-run before running: agent-relay run --dry-run workflow.ts
⚡ Parallelism — Design for Speed
Cross-Workflow Parallelism: Wave Planning
agent-relay run workflows/34-sst-wiring.ts
agent-relay run workflows/35-env-config.ts
agent-relay run workflows/36-loading-states.ts
agent-relay run workflows/34-sst-wiring.ts &
agent-relay run workflows/35-env-config.ts &
agent-relay run workflows/36-loading-states.ts &
agent-relay run workflows/37-responsive.ts &
wait
git add -A && git commit -m "Wave 1"
agent-relay run workflows/40-unit-tests.ts &
agent-relay run workflows/41-integration-tests.ts &
agent-relay run workflows/42-e2e-tests.ts &
wait
git add -A && git commit -m "Wave 2"
Declare File Scope for Planning
workflow('48-comparison-mode')
.packages(['web', 'core'])
.isolatedFrom(['49-feedback-system'])
.requiresBefore(['46-admin-dashboard'])
Within-Workflow Parallelism
.step('fix-component-a', { agent: 'worker', dependsOn: ['review'] })
.step('fix-component-b', { agent: 'worker', dependsOn: ['fix-component-a'] })
.step('fix-component-a', { agent: 'impl-1', dependsOn: ['review'] })
.step('fix-component-b', { agent: 'impl-2', dependsOn: ['review'] })
.step('verify-all', { agent: 'reviewer', dependsOn: ['fix-component-a', 'fix-component-b'] })
Failure Prevention
1. Do not use raw top-level await
async function runWorkflow() {
const result = await workflow('my-workflow')
.run({ cwd: process.cwd() });
console.log('Workflow status:', result.status);
}
runWorkflow().catch((error) => {
console.error(error);
process.exit(1);
});
2b. Standard preflight template for resumable workflows
.step('preflight', {
type: 'deterministic',
command: [
'set -e',
'BRANCH=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)',
'echo "branch: $BRANCH"',
'if [ "$BRANCH" != "fix/your-branch-name" ]; then echo "ERROR: wrong branch"; exit 1; fi',
'ALLOWED_DIRTY="package-lock.json|path/to/file1\\\\.ts|path/to/file2\\\\.ts"',
'DIRTY=$(git diff --name-only | grep -vE "^(${ALLOWED_DIRTY})$" || true)',
'if [ -n "$DIRTY" ]; then echo "ERROR: unexpected tracked drift:"; echo "$DIRTY"; exit 1; fi',
'if ! git diff --cached --quiet; then echo "ERROR: staging area is dirty"; git diff --cached --stat; exit 1; fi',
'gh auth status >/dev/null 2>&1 || (echo "ERROR: gh CLI not authenticated"; exit 1)',
'echo PREFLIGHT_OK',
].join(' && '),
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: true,
}),
2c. Picking the right .join() for multi-line shell commands
command: [
'set -e',
'HITS=$(grep -c diag src/cli/commands/setup.ts || true)',
'if [ "$HITS" -lt 6 ]; then echo "FAIL"; exit 1; fi',
'echo OK',
].join(' && '),
3. Keep final verification boring and deterministic
grep -Eq "foo|bar|baz" file.ts
6. Be explicit about shell requirements
/opt/homebrew/bin/bash workflows/your-workflow/execute.sh --wave 2
9. Factor repo-specific setup into a shared helper
export interface CloudRepoSetupOptions {
branch: string;
committerName?: string;
extraSetupCommands?: string[];
skipWorkspaceBuild?: boolean;
}
export function applyCloudRepoSetup<T>(wf: T, opts: CloudRepoSetupOptions): T {
}
End-to-End Bug Fix Workflows
- Capture the original failure
- Reproduce the bug first in a deterministic or evidence-capturing step
- Save exact commands, logs, status codes, or screenshots/artifacts
- State the acceptance contract
- Define the exact end-to-end success criteria before implementation
- Include the real entrypoint a user would run
- Implement the fix
- Rebuild / reinstall from scratch
- Do not trust dirty local state
- Prefer a clean environment when install/bootstrap behavior is involved
- Run targeted regression checks
- Unit/integration tests are helpful but not sufficient by themselves
- Run a full end-to-end validation
- Use the real CLI / API / install path
- Prefer a clean environment (Docker, sandbox, cloud workspace, Daytona, etc.) for install/runtime issues
- Compare before vs after evidence
- Show that the original failure no longer occurs
- Record residual risks
- Call out what was not covered
- Ship the result as a PR
- Open the pull request from the workflow itself with
createGitHubStep
- See Shipping the Result — Open a PR via
createGitHubStep below
- A workflow that fixes a bug and stops short of the PR has only done half the loop
- disposable sandbox / cloud workspace
- Docker / containerized environment
- fresh local shell with isolated paths
- compares candidate validation environments
- defines the acceptance contract
- chooses the best swarm pattern
- then authors the final fix/validation workflow
Shipping the Result — Open a PR via createGitHubStep
The minimal "open a PR" recipe
import { workflow } from '@agent-relay/sdk/workflows';
import { createGitHubStep } from '@agent-relay/sdk';
const REPO = 'AgentWorkforce/cloud';
const BRANCH = `agent-relay/run-${Date.now()}`;
async function runWorkflow() {
await workflow('feature-x')
.step('write-marker', {
type: 'deterministic',
command: `echo "fix landed at $(date -u)" >> CHANGELOG.md`,
})
.step('create-branch', createGitHubStep({
dependsOn: ['write-marker'],
action: 'createBranch',
repo: REPO,
params: { branch: BRANCH, source: 'main' },
}))
.step('commit-change', createGitHubStep({
dependsOn: ['create-branch'],
action: 'createFile',
repo: REPO,
params: {
path: 'CHANGELOG.md',
branch: BRANCH,
content: '<file body here>',
message: 'chore: changelog entry',
},
}))
.step('open-pr', createGitHubStep({
dependsOn: ['commit-change'],
action: 'createPR',
repo: REPO,
params: {
title: 'feat: ship feature X',
head: BRANCH,
base: 'main',
body: '## Summary\n\n- ...\n\n## Test plan\n\n- [x] ...',
draft: false,
},
output: { mode: 'data', format: 'json', path: 'html_url' },
}))
.run({ cwd: process.cwd() });
}
runWorkflow().catch((error) => {
console.error(error);
process.exit(1);
});
Key Concepts
Verification Gates
verification: { type: 'exit_code' }
verification: { type: 'output_contains', value: 'DONE' }
verification: { type: 'file_exists', value: 'src/out.ts' }
verification: { type: 'pr_url', value: 'owner/repo' }
DAG Dependencies
.step('fix-types', { agent: 'worker', dependsOn: ['review'], ... })
.step('fix-tests', { agent: 'worker', dependsOn: ['review'], ... })
.step('final', { agent: 'lead', dependsOn: ['fix-types', 'fix-tests'], ... })
SDK API
relay.subscribe({ agent: 'security-auditor', channels: ['review-pr-456'] });
relay.unsubscribe({ agent: 'security-auditor', channels: ['general'] });
relay.mute({ agent: 'security-auditor', channel: 'review-pr-123' });
relay.unmute({ agent: 'security-auditor', channel: 'review-pr-123' });
Events
relay.onChannelSubscribed = (agent, channels) => { };
relay.onChannelUnsubscribed = (agent, channels) => { };
relay.onChannelMuted = (agent, channel) => { };
relay.onChannelUnmuted = (agent, channel) => { };
Agent Definition
```typescript
.agent('name', {
cli: 'claude' | 'codex' | 'gemini' | 'aider' | 'goose' | 'opencode' | 'droid',
role?: string,
preset?: 'lead' | 'worker' | 'reviewer' | 'analyst',
retries?: number,
model?: string,
interactive?: boolean,
})
Model Constants
import { ClaudeModels, CodexModels, GeminiModels } from '@agent-relay/config';
.agent('planner', { cli: 'claude', model: ClaudeModels.OPUS })
.agent('worker', { cli: 'claude', model: ClaudeModels.SONNET })
.agent('coder', { cli: 'codex', model: CodexModels.GPT_5_4 })
Step Definition
Agent Steps
.step('name', {
agent: string,
task: string,
dependsOn?: string[],
verification?: VerificationCheck,
retries?: number,
})
Deterministic Steps (Shell Commands)
.step('verify-files', {
type: 'deterministic',
command: 'test -f src/auth.ts && echo "FILE_EXISTS"',
dependsOn: ['implement'],
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: false,
})
.step('repair-files', {
agent: 'worker',
dependsOn: ['verify-files'],
task: `If verify-files failed, create or fix the missing file and rerun the check.
Output:
{{steps.verify-files.output}}`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('verify-files-final', {
type: 'deterministic',
command: 'test -f src/auth.ts && echo "FILE_EXISTS"',
dependsOn: ['repair-files'],
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: true,
})
Common Patterns
Mandatory Claude-Then-Codex Review/Fix Loops
.agent('claude-reviewer', {
cli: 'claude',
preset: 'reviewer',
role: 'First-pass fresh-eyes reviewer. Reads actual files, diffs, rules, and evidence from scratch.',
retries: 1,
})
.agent('claude-fixer', {
cli: 'claude',
role: 'Fixer for valid Claude review findings. Adds or updates tests/proofs for each fix.',
retries: 2,
})
.agent('codex-reviewer', {
cli: 'codex',
preset: 'reviewer',
role: 'Second-pass fresh-eyes reviewer. Reviews the post-Claude-fix state from scratch.',
retries: 1,
})
.agent('codex-fixer', {
cli: 'codex',
role: 'Fixer for valid Codex review findings. Adds or updates tests/proofs for each fix.',
retries: 2,
})
.step('claude-review', {
agent: 'claude-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['verify-final'],
task: `First-pass fresh-eyes review.
Read the task spec, AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md, changed files, final diff, artifacts, and verification evidence:
{{steps.verify-final.output}}
Write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/claude-review.md.
Use actionable findings with file paths, severity, and required fixes.
If there are no issues, write NO_ISSUES_FOUND.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('claude-fix', {
agent: 'claude-fixer',
dependsOn: ['claude-review'],
task: `Read .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/claude-review.md.
If it contains findings, fix every valid issue and add or update appropriate tests/proofs. After each fix, rerun targeted checks and review the touched files again.
Keep iterating locally until this round has no remaining valid issues.
Write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/claude-fix.md with fixes and commands run.
If the review says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, record that no fix was needed.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('claude-review-final', {
agent: 'claude-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['claude-fix'],
task: `Review the post-Claude-fix state from scratch. Do not rely on prior review text or fixer summaries.
Read the files, diff, rules, spec, and evidence. Write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/claude-review-final.md.
Use NO_ISSUES_FOUND only if there are no actionable issues left.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('claude-fix-final', {
agent: 'claude-fixer',
dependsOn: ['claude-review-final'],
task: `If the final Claude review contains findings, fix them, add or update appropriate tests/proofs, rerun relevant checks, and write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/claude-fix-final.md.
If a finding cannot be fixed, write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md with exact evidence.
If the final review says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/claude-signoff.md.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('verify-after-claude-review', {
type: 'deterministic',
dependsOn: ['claude-fix-final'],
command: 'test ! -f .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md && npm run typecheck && npm test 2>&1',
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: false,
})
.step('codex-review', {
agent: 'codex-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['verify-after-claude-review'],
task: `Second-pass fresh-eyes review of the post-Claude-fix state.
Read the task spec, AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md, changed files, final diff, artifacts, and verification evidence:
{{steps.verify-after-claude-review.output}}
Write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/codex-review.md.
Use actionable findings with file paths, severity, and required fixes.
If there are no issues, write NO_ISSUES_FOUND.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('codex-fix', {
agent: 'codex-fixer',
dependsOn: ['codex-review'],
task: `Read .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/codex-review.md.
If it contains findings, fix every valid issue and add or update appropriate tests/proofs. After each fix, rerun targeted checks and review the touched files again.
Keep iterating locally until this round has no remaining valid issues.
Write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/codex-fix.md with fixes and commands run.
If the review says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, record that no fix was needed.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('codex-review-final', {
agent: 'codex-reviewer',
dependsOn: ['codex-fix'],
task: `Review the post-fix state from scratch. Do not rely on prior review text or fixer summaries.
Read the files, diff, rules, spec, and evidence. Write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/codex-review-final.md.
Use NO_ISSUES_FOUND only if there are no actionable issues left.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('codex-fix-final', {
agent: 'codex-fixer',
dependsOn: ['codex-review-final'],
task: `If the final review contains findings, fix them, add or update appropriate tests/proofs, rerun relevant checks, and write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/codex-fix-final.md.
If a finding cannot be fixed, write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md with exact evidence.
If the final review says NO_ISSUES_FOUND, write .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/codex-signoff.md.`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('acceptance-after-codex-review', {
type: 'deterministic',
dependsOn: ['codex-fix-final'],
command: 'test ! -f .workflow-artifacts/<workflow>/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md && npm run typecheck && npm test 2>&1',
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: true,
})
Interactive Team (lead + workers on shared channel)
.agent('lead', {
cli: 'claude',
model: ClaudeModels.OPUS,
role: 'Architect and reviewer — assigns work, reviews, posts feedback',
retries: 1,
})
.agent('impl-new', {
cli: 'codex',
model: CodexModels.GPT_5_4,
role: 'Creates new files. Listens on channel for assignments and feedback.',
retries: 2,
})
.agent('impl-modify', {
cli: 'codex',
model: CodexModels.GPT_5_4,
role: 'Edits existing files. Listens on channel for assignments and feedback.',
retries: 2,
})
.step('lead-coordinate', {
agent: 'lead',
dependsOn: ['context'],
task: `You are the lead on #channel. Workers: impl-new, impl-modify.
Post the plan. Assign files. Review their work. Post feedback if needed.
Workers iterate based on your feedback. Exit when all files are correct.`,
})
.step('impl-new-work', {
agent: 'impl-new',
dependsOn: ['context'],
task: `You are impl-new on #channel. Wait for the lead's plan.
Create files as assigned. Report completion. Fix issues from feedback.`,
})
.step('impl-modify-work', {
agent: 'impl-modify',
dependsOn: ['context'],
task: `You are impl-modify on #channel. Wait for the lead's plan.
Edit files as assigned. Report completion. Fix issues from feedback.`,
})
.step('verify', { type: 'deterministic', dependsOn: ['lead-coordinate'], ... })
1. Question / Answer (blocking ask)
.step('integrate', {
agent: 'integrator',
dependsOn: ['context'],
task: `You are the integrator on #wf-feature.
Before writing code, post a direct question to @schema-owner asking which
table owns the new field. Do NOT proceed until @schema-owner replies in
channel. If no reply arrives in 5 minutes, @-mention the lead.`,
})
2. Broadcast / Ack
.step('lead-coordinate', {
agent: 'lead',
dependsOn: ['context'],
task: `Post the plan to #wf-feature, then @impl-a @impl-b @impl-c.
Wait for each to reply with "ACK <agent-name>" before issuing assignments.
If any worker hasn't acked in 3 minutes, re-post and ping again.
Only after all three have acked, post per-worker assignments.`,
})
3. Peer Review Handoff
.step('impl-a-work', {
agent: 'impl-a',
dependsOn: ['context'],
task: `Implement src/foo.ts per the lead's assignment.
When done, post to #wf-feature: "@reviewer ready: src/foo.ts" — include the
commit SHA. Then wait for @reviewer's verdict in channel.
- If "APPROVED", you're done.
- If "CHANGES_REQUESTED <notes>", apply the notes and re-post.
- If no verdict in 5 min, @-mention the lead.`,
})
4. Standup / Status Probe
.step('lead-coordinate', {
agent: 'lead',
task: `... coordinate the team ...
Every 10 minutes, post a status probe: "@impl-a @impl-b status?"
Each worker should reply with one of:
- "RUNNING <step>" (still working)
- "BLOCKED <reason>" (@-mention the lead with the blocker)
- "DONE <artifact>" (ready for review)
If a worker is silent for two probes in a row, mark them stalled and
reassign their work to a peer.`,
})
5. Hand-Off with Context
.step('impl-a-work', {
agent: 'impl-a',
task: `... finish your part ...
When done, post a handoff to #wf-feature targeting the next worker:
"@impl-b HANDOFF: src/foo.ts ready. Touched: <files>. Open question: <if any>.
Tests: <pass/fail summary>. Commit: <sha>."`,
})
Pipeline (sequential handoff)
.pattern('pipeline')
.step('analyze', { agent: 'analyst', task: '...' })
.step('implement', { agent: 'dev', task: '{{steps.analyze.output}}', dependsOn: ['analyze'] })
.step('test', { agent: 'tester', task: '{{steps.implement.output}}', dependsOn: ['implement'] })
Error Handling
.onError('fail-fast')
.onError('continue')
.onError('retry', { maxRetries: 3, retryDelayMs: 5000 })
Multi-File Edit Pattern
When a workflow needs to modify multiple existing files, use one agent step per file with a deterministic verify gate after each. Agents reliably edit 1-2 files per step but fail on 4+.
steps:
- name: read-types
type: deterministic
command: cat src/types.ts
captureOutput: true
- name: edit-types
agent: dev
dependsOn: [read-types]
task: |
Edit src/types.ts. Current contents:
{{steps.read-types.output}}
Add 'pending' to the Status union type.
Only edit this one file.
verification:
type: exit_code
- name: verify-types
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [edit-types]
command: 'if git diff --quiet src/types.ts; then echo "NOT MODIFIED"; exit 1; fi; echo "OK"'
captureOutput: true
failOnError: false
- name: fix-types-verification
agent: dev
dependsOn: [verify-types]
task: |
If verify-types failed, fix src/types.ts and rerun the verify command.
Output:
{{steps.verify-types.output}}
verification:
type: exit_code
- name: verify-types-final
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [fix-types-verification]
command: 'if git diff --quiet src/types.ts; then echo "NOT MODIFIED"; exit 1; fi; echo "OK"'
captureOutput: true
failOnError: true
- name: read-service
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [verify-types-final]
command: cat src/service.ts
captureOutput: true
- name: edit-service
agent: dev
dependsOn: [read-service]
task: |
Edit src/service.ts. Current contents:
{{steps.read-service.output}}
Add a handlePending() method.
Only edit this one file.
verification:
type: exit_code
- name: verify-service
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [edit-service]
command: 'if git diff --quiet src/service.ts; then echo "NOT MODIFIED"; exit 1; fi; echo "OK"'
captureOutput: true
failOnError: false
- name: fix-service-verification
agent: dev
dependsOn: [verify-service]
task: |
If verify-service failed, fix src/service.ts and rerun the verify command.
Output:
{{steps.verify-service.output}}
verification:
type: exit_code
- name: verify-service-final
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [fix-service-verification]
command: 'if git diff --quiet src/service.ts; then echo "NOT MODIFIED"; exit 1; fi; echo "OK"'
captureOutput: true
failOnError: true
- name: commit
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [verify-service-final]
command: npm run typecheck && npm test && git add src/types.ts src/service.ts && git commit -m "feat: add pending status"
captureOutput: true
failOnError: false
- name: repair-commit
agent: dev
dependsOn: [commit]
task: |
If commit failed, fix the blocker, rerun npm run typecheck && npm test, and create the commit.
If commit passed, confirm the commit subject.
Output:
{{steps.commit.output}}
verification:
type: exit_code
- name: verify-commit-created
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [repair-commit]
command: 'git log -1 --pretty=%s | grep -q "^feat: add pending status$" && echo "COMMIT_OK" || (echo "COMMIT_MISSING"; exit 1)'
captureOutput: true
failOnError: true
File Materialization: Verify Before Proceeding
After any step that creates files, add a deterministic file_exists check before proceeding. Non-interactive agents may exit 0 without writing anything (wrong cwd, stdout instead of disk).
- name: verify-files
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [impl-auth, impl-storage]
command: |
missing=0
for f in src/auth/credentials.ts src/storage/client.ts; do
if [ ! -f "$f" ]; then echo "MISSING: $f"; missing=$((missing+1)); fi
done
if [ $missing -gt 0 ]; then echo "$missing files missing"; exit 1; fi
echo "All files present"
captureOutput: true
failOnError: false
- name: fix-missing-files
agent: impl-auth
dependsOn: [verify-files]
task: |
If verify-files found missing files, create/fix them and rerun the check.
Output:
{{steps.verify-files.output}}
verification:
type: exit_code
- name: verify-files-final
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [fix-missing-files]
command: |
missing=0
for f in src/auth/credentials.ts src/storage/client.ts; do
if [ ! -f "$f" ]; then echo "MISSING: $f"; missing=$((missing+1)); fi
done
if [ $missing -gt 0 ]; then echo "$missing files missing"; exit 1; fi
echo "All files present"
captureOutput: true
failOnError: true
Edit Gates Must See Untracked Files
- name: provider-edit-gate-capture
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [implement-providers]
command: |
if [ -z "$(git status --short -- packages/new-provider .workflow-artifacts/my-flow)" ]; then
echo "NO_PROVIDER_CHANGES"
exit 1
fi
echo "PROVIDER_EDIT_GATE_OK"
captureOutput: true
failOnError: false
- name: repair-edit-gate
agent: provider-worker
dependsOn: [provider-edit-gate-capture]
task: |
If provider-edit-gate-capture reported NO_PROVIDER_CHANGES, inspect git
status including untracked files and add the missing provider artifacts.
If it already passed, do nothing.
verification:
type: exit_code
- name: provider-edit-gate-final
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [repair-edit-gate]
command: |
if [ -z "$(git status --short -- packages/new-provider .workflow-artifacts/my-flow)" ]; then
echo "NO_PROVIDER_CHANGES"
exit 1
fi
echo "PROVIDER_EDIT_GATE_FINAL_OK"
captureOutput: true
failOnError: false
- name: repair-provider-edit-gate-final
agent: provider-worker
dependsOn: [provider-edit-gate-final]
task: |
If provider-edit-gate-final is still red, repair the missing provider
artifacts and rerun the check. If repair is impossible, write
.workflow-artifacts/my-flow/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md with exact evidence and
do not commit.
Output:
{{steps.provider-edit-gate-final.output}}
verification:
type: exit_code
Agent Transport Must Not Be The First Hard Gate
Interactive lead-and-worker teams are useful, but they are still process
.step('runtime-implementation', {
agent: 'impl-runtime',
dependsOn: ['context'],
task: 'Implement the runtime slice and write .workflow-artifacts/runtime.md',
})
.step('adapter-implementation', {
agent: 'impl-adapters',
dependsOn: ['context'],
task: 'Implement adapter wiring and write .workflow-artifacts/adapters.md',
})
.step('implementation-reconcile', {
type: 'deterministic',
dependsOn: ['context'],
command: `git status --short -- packages/core packages/*/src/writeback.ts scripts tests .workflow-artifacts
test -f scripts/verify-e2e.mjs || echo "MISSING_E2E"
test -f packages/core/src/runtime/router.ts || echo "MISSING_ROUTER"`,
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: false,
})
.step('repair-implementation-reconcile', {
agent: 'qa',
dependsOn: ['implementation-reconcile'],
task: `Finish anything missing before gates run:\n{{steps.implementation-reconcile.output}}`,
verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('run-e2e', {
type: 'deterministic',
dependsOn: ['repair-implementation-reconcile'],
command: 'npm run verify:e2e',
captureOutput: true,
failOnError: false,
})
DAG Deadlock Anti-Pattern
```yaml
steps:
- name: coordinate
dependsOn: [context]
- name: work-a
dependsOn: [coordinate]
steps:
- name: context
type: deterministic
- name: work-a
dependsOn: [context]
- name: coordinate
dependsOn: [context]
- name: merge
dependsOn: [work-a, coordinate]
Step Sizing
One agent, one deliverable. A step's task prompt should be 10-20 lines max.
steps:
- name: track-lead-coord
agent: track-lead
dependsOn: [prior-step]
task: |
Lead the track on #my-track. Workers: track-worker-1, track-worker-2.
Post assignments to the channel. Review worker output.
- name: track-worker-1-impl
agent: track-worker-1
dependsOn: [prior-step]
task: |
Join #my-track. track-lead will post your assignment.
Implement the file as directed.
verification:
type: exit_code
- name: next-step
dependsOn: [track-lead-coord]
Supervisor Pattern
When you set .pattern('supervisor') (or hub-spoke, fan-out), the runner auto-assigns a supervisor agent as owner for worker steps. The supervisor monitors progress, nudges idle workers, and issues OWNER_DECISION.
Auto-hardening only activates for hub patterns — not pipeline or dag.
| Use case | Pattern | Why |
|---|
| Sequential, no monitoring | pipeline | Simple, no overhead |
| Workers need oversight | supervisor | Auto-owner monitors |
| Local/small models | supervisor | Supervisor catches stuck workers |
| All non-interactive | pipeline or dag | No PTY = no supervision needed |
Concurrency
Cap maxConcurrency at 4-6. Spawning 10+ agents simultaneously causes broker timeouts.
| Parallel agents | maxConcurrency |
|---|
| 2-4 | 4 (default safe) |
| 5-10 | 5 |
| 10+ | 6-8 max |
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|
Treating relay as transport, not as a coordination layer (every step is preset: 'worker', every handoff is {{steps.X.output}}) | Default to Conversation shape for non-trivial work — interactive agents on a shared channel. Pipeline-shape is only correct when the work could be expressed as a bash | bash | bash pipe. |
| Interactive agents on a channel whose task strings don't tell them to talk to each other | Pick a Chat-Native Coordination Recipe (Q/A, Broadcast/Ack, Peer Review, Standup, Hand-Off) and bake it into the task prompt — otherwise you're paying for a chat substrate you're not using |
| All workflows run sequentially | Group independent workflows into parallel waves (4-7x speedup) |
| Every step depends on the previous one | Only add dependsOn when there's a real data dependency |
| Self-review step with no timeout | Set timeout: 300_000 (5 min) — Codex hangs in non-interactive review |
| One giant workflow per feature | Split into smaller workflows that can run in parallel waves |
| Adding exit instructions to tasks | Runner handles self-termination automatically |
| Interactive PTY Codex for one-shot artifact steps | Use preset: 'worker' plus file_exists or custom verification |
Setting timeoutMs on agents/steps | Use global .timeout() only |
Using general channel | Set .channel('wf-name') for isolation |
{{steps.X.output}} without dependsOn: ['X'] | Output won't be available yet |
| Requiring exact sentinel as only completion gate | Use exit_code or file_exists verification |
| Writing 100-line task prompts | Split into lead + workers on a channel |
maxConcurrency: 16 with many parallel steps | Cap at 5-6 |
| Non-interactive agent reading large files via tools | Pre-read in deterministic step, inject via {{steps.X.output}} |
| Workers depending on lead step (deadlock) | Both depend on shared context step |
| Validation gates depending directly on long interactive implementation agents | Add a deterministic implementation-reconcile step and make gates depend on its repair step |
fan-out/hub-spoke for simple parallel workers | Use dag instead |
pipeline but expecting auto-supervisor | Only hub patterns auto-harden. Use .pattern('supervisor') |
Workers without preset: 'worker' in one-shot DAG lead+worker flows | Add preset for clean stdout when chaining {{steps.X.output}} (not needed for interactive team patterns) |
Using _ in YAML numbers (timeoutMs: 1_200_000) | YAML doesn't support _ separators |
| Workflow timeout under 30 min for complex workflows | Use 3600000 (1 hour) as default |
Using require() in ESM projects | Check package.json for "type": "module" — use import if ESM |
Raw top-level await in workflow files | Executor paths may compile as CJS. Wrap .run() in async function runWorkflow() for both ESM and CJS files |
Using createWorkflowRenderer | Does not exist. Use .run({ cwd: process.cwd() }) |
export default workflow(...)...build() | No .build(). Chain ends with .run() — the file must call .run(), not just export config |
Relative import '../workflows/builder.js' | Use import { workflow } from '@agent-relay/sdk/workflows' |
Hardcoded model strings (model: 'opus') | Use constants: import { ClaudeModels } from '@agent-relay/config' → model: ClaudeModels.OPUS |
Thinking agent-relay run inspects exports | It executes the file as a subprocess. Only .run() invocations trigger steps |
pattern('single') on cloud runner | Not supported — use dag |
pattern('supervisor') with one agent | Same agent is owner + specialist. Use dag |
Invalid verification type (type: 'deterministic') | Only exit_code, output_contains, file_exists, custom are valid |
Chaining {{steps.X.output}} from interactive agents | PTY output is garbled. Use deterministic steps or preset: 'worker' |
| Single step editing 4+ files | Agents modify 1-2 then exit. Split to one file per step with verify gates |
Relying on agents to git commit | Agents emit markers without running git. Use deterministic commit step |
File-writing steps without file_exists verification | exit_code auto-passes even if no file written |
Codex login checked only with codex login status | Add a tiny codex exec --ephemeral --json --sandbox read-only preflight probe so stale refresh tokens fail before agent steps |
Edit gate uses git diff --quiet for new files/packages | git diff ignores untracked files and can fail a valid implementation with NO_CHANGES; use git status --short -- <paths> for materialization gates |
| Hard-stop validation gates in product workflows | A red check stops the agent team at the exact moment it should fix the problem. Capture gate output with failOnError: false, add a repair agent step, rerun, and reserve hard failure for exhausted repair budget or external blockers |
| Final acceptance before repair and dual review | Broken work can stop or commit without giving the team a final chance to fix it. Run repairable gates first, then the Claude-then-Codex review/fix loops, then final deterministic acceptance before commit/PR |
| Skipping the mandatory dual review loops | Add sequential Claude-then-Codex fresh-eyes review/fix loops after repairable verification and before final acceptance, commit, PR creation, or handoff |
| Treating optional notification credentials as fatal | Workflow progress gets blocked by a non-core side effect. Prefer primitive/runtime fallbacks such as the Slack primitive's cloud-relay or noop shape from AgentWorkforce/relay#823 when notification is not the product contract |
Manual peer fanout in handleChannelMessage() | Use broker-managed channel subscriptions — broker fans out to all subscribers automatically |
Client-side personaNames.has(from) filtering | Use relay.subscribe()/relay.unsubscribe() — only subscribed agents receive messages |
| Agents receiving noisy cross-channel messages during focused work | Use relay.mute({ agent, channel }) to silence non-primary channels without leaving them |
| Hardcoding all channels at spawn time | Use agent.subscribe() / agent.unsubscribe() for dynamic channel membership post-spawn |
Using preset: 'worker' for Codex in interactive team patterns when coordination is needed | Codex interactive mode works fine with PTY channel injection. Drop the preset for interactive team patterns (keep it for one-shot DAG workers where clean stdout matters) |
| Treating the lead's informal review as final signoff | The lead may review during implementation, but final signoff still requires the mandatory Claude-then-Codex fresh-eyes review/fix loops |
Not printing PR URL after createGitHubStep({ action: 'createPR' }) | Capture html_url with output: { mode: 'data', format: 'json', path: 'html_url' } and echo or write it in a final deterministic step |
| Workflow ending without worktree + PR for cross-repo changes | Add setup-worktree at start and push-and-pr + cleanup-worktree at end |
YAML Alternative
```yaml
version: '1.0'
name: my-workflow
swarm:
pattern: dag
channel: wf-my-workflow
agents:
- name: lead
cli: claude
role: Architect
- name: worker
cli: codex
role: Implementer
- name: claude-reviewer
cli: claude
preset: reviewer
role: First-pass fresh-eyes reviewer
- name: claude-fixer
cli: claude
role: First-pass review fixer
- name: codex-reviewer
cli: codex
preset: reviewer
role: Second-pass fresh-eyes reviewer
- name: codex-fixer
cli: codex
role: Second-pass review fixer
workflows:
- name: default
steps:
- name: plan
agent: lead
task: 'Produce a detailed implementation plan.'
- name: implement
agent: worker
task: 'Implement: {{steps.plan.output}}'
dependsOn: [plan]
verification:
type: exit_code
- name: claude-review
agent: claude-reviewer
dependsOn: [implement]
task: 'Review actual files, diff, rules, and evidence. Write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/claude-review.md with findings or NO_ISSUES_FOUND.'
- name: claude-fix
agent: claude-fixer
dependsOn: [claude-review]
task: 'Fix valid Claude review findings, add or update appropriate tests/proofs, rerun relevant checks, and write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/claude-fix.md.'
- name: claude-review-final
agent: claude-reviewer
dependsOn: [claude-fix]
task: 'Review the post-Claude-fix state from scratch and write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/claude-review-final.md.'
- name: claude-fix-final
agent: claude-fixer
dependsOn: [claude-review-final]
task: 'Fix remaining Claude findings, add/update tests or proofs, or write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md.'
- name: codex-review
agent: codex-reviewer
dependsOn: [claude-fix-final]
task: 'Review the post-Claude-fix state from scratch. Write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/codex-review.md with findings or NO_ISSUES_FOUND.'
- name: codex-fix
agent: codex-fixer
dependsOn: [codex-review]
task: 'Fix valid Codex review findings, add or update appropriate tests/proofs, rerun relevant checks, and write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/codex-fix.md.'
- name: codex-review-final
agent: codex-reviewer
dependsOn: [codex-fix]
task: 'Review the post-Codex-fix state from scratch and write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/codex-review-final.md.'
- name: codex-fix-final
agent: codex-fixer
dependsOn: [codex-review-final]
task: 'Fix remaining Codex findings, add/update tests or proofs, or write .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md.'
- name: acceptance-after-review
type: deterministic
dependsOn: [codex-fix-final]
command: 'test ! -f .workflow-artifacts/my-workflow/BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT.md && echo ACCEPTANCE_OK'
captureOutput: true
failOnError: true
Available Swarm Patterns
dag (default), fan-out, pipeline, hub-spoke, consensus, mesh, handoff, cascade, debate, hierarchical, map-reduce, scatter-gather, supervisor, reflection, red-team, verifier, auction, escalation, saga, circuit-breaker, blackboard, swarm
See skill choosing-swarm-patterns for pattern selection guidance.
