pdf-research-corpus-analyzer

name	pdf-research-corpus-analyzer
description	Download, extract, cross-reference, and generate sequenced reading plans from folders of PDF research papers or books. Use this skill whenever the user asks to analyze a collection of PDFs, build a reading plan from multiple documents, find connections between papers or books, create a concept index across documents, extract key ideas from a research corpus, stitch together a curriculum from PDFs, cross-reference themes across papers, map how ideas connect between documents, or says things like 'I have a folder of PDFs', 'find the connections between these papers', 'build me a reading plan', 'what do these documents have in common', 'analyze these research papers', 'summarize and cross-reference my PDFs', 'create a study guide from these papers', or 'download papers on X and analyze them'. Also trigger when the user wants to understand how multiple academic papers relate, wants a structured literature review, or wants to turn a pile of unorganized PDFs into an actionable reading sequence with exact page references.
version	1.0.0

PDF Research Corpus Analyzer

Turn a folder of PDFs (or a topic to research) into a structured concept index and sequenced reading plan with exact page references. No vector databases, no embeddings — just structured extraction and concept-level cross-referencing.

Why This Approach Works Better Than Vectors

Vector/embedding search finds similarity — passages that use similar words. This skill finds structure — how ideas build on each other, where arguments agree or conflict, and what sequence a reader should follow. Vectors can't generate a reading plan because they don't understand order, argumentation, or pedagogical flow. Structured summarization + concept indexing does.

The Pipeline

The skill has three phases, always executed in order:

Phase 1: Acquire PDFs

Two modes depending on what the user provides:

Mode A — User has a folder of PDFs already:

• Confirm the folder path
• List and inventory every PDF (filename, size)
• Proceed to Phase 2

Mode B — User gives a topic, you find the papers:

• Search for research papers using web_search (run 2-3 queries with different angles: survey papers, specific subtopics, recent work)
• Identify 5-10 high-quality papers from arxiv, ACL Anthology, AAAI, IEEE, ACM, etc.
• Download each PDF using execute_javascript_code with fetch() + fs.writeFileSync()
• Save all PDFs to a workspace subdirectory named after the topic (kebab-case)
• Verify all downloads succeeded before proceeding

Important download patterns:

• arxiv PDFs: use https://arxiv.org/pdf/XXXX.XXXXX (no .pdf extension needed, it redirects)
• ACL Anthology: direct .pdf links work
• Always set redirect: 'follow' in fetch options
• Name files with a numbered prefix for ordering: 01_Title.pdf, 02_Title.pdf

Phase 2: Extract and Map

Install PyMuPDF if needed (pip install pymupdf --quiet), then run a Python extraction script.

What to extract per PDF:

1. Total page count
2. Full text from every page (cap at ~3000 chars per page to stay manageable)
3. Section headings — detect via patterns:
   • Numbered sections: 1 Introduction, 2.1 Memory Types
   • ALL CAPS headings
   • Bold/large text patterns
4. Page ranges for each section

Save the extraction as extracted_text.json in the working directory.

The extraction script pattern:

import fitz, json, os, sys

DIR = r"<folder_path>"
out = {}

for fname in sorted(os.listdir(DIR)):
    if not fname.endswith('.pdf'):
        continue
    fpath = os.path.join(DIR, fname)
    try:
        doc = fitz.open(fpath)
        total_pages = len(doc)
        pages = []
        for i, page in enumerate(doc):
            text = page.get_text("text").strip()
            if text:
                pages.append({"page": i+1, "text": text[:3000]})
        doc.close()
        out[fname] = {
            "total_pages": total_pages,
            "extracted_pages": len(pages),
            "pages": pages
        }
    except Exception as e:
        out[fname] = {"error": str(e)}

with open(os.path.join(DIR, "extracted_text.json"), "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
    json.dump(out, f, ensure_ascii=False)

Phase 3: Build Concept Index and Reading Plan

This is the core intellectual work. Run a Python script that:

3a. Section Mapping

For each PDF, identify sections with their page ranges. Use regex heading detection:

• r'^(\d+\.?\s+[A-Z][A-Za-z\s:,\-]+)' for numbered sections
• r'^(\d+\.\d+\.?\s+[A-Z][A-Za-z\s:,\-]+)' for subsections
• r'^([A-Z][A-Z\s]{5,})' for ALL CAPS headings

3b. Concept Detection

Search every page for a curated list of domain-relevant concepts. The concept keyword list should be tailored to the corpus topic. Start with 40-60 keywords covering:

• Core terminology of the field
• Key methodologies
• Important frameworks/models
• Cross-cutting themes
• Evaluation approaches

For each concept found, record which PDF and which pages mention it.

3c. Cross-Document Concept Index

Invert the per-paper concept lists into a cross-document index:

{
  "concept_name": [
    {"pdf": "filename.pdf", "title": "Paper Title", "pages": [1, 5, 12]},
    {"pdf": "other.pdf", "title": "Other Paper", "pages": [3, 7]}
  ]
}

Sort by number of sources (most cross-referenced first). This reveals the load-bearing concepts of the corpus.

3d. Tiered Classification

Classify concepts into tiers:

• Tier 1 (Universal): Found in ALL or nearly all papers — these are the field's foundations
• Tier 2 (Major): Found in 60-80% of papers — important cross-cutting themes
• Tier 3 (Specialized): Found in 30-50% of papers — niche but significant topics

3e. Reading Plan Generation

Generate a sequenced reading plan with this structure:

Sequencing logic (in order of priority):

1. Surveys/overviews before specialized papers
2. Foundational concepts before advanced ones
3. Shorter/simpler papers before longer/complex ones
4. Within a phase, order by how many Tier 1 concepts a paper covers

Reading plan format:

### Phase N: [Theme Name] (est. XX min)

**Step N.** 📄 Paper XX → **Pages XX-XX**
*[Paper Title — Section Name]*
> [1-2 sentence explanation of what the reader will learn and why it comes at this point in the sequence]

Always include:

• Estimated reading time per phase and total
• A "30-minute quick path" for time-constrained readers (3 segments max)
• Topic-specific deep-dive alternatives (table format)

Output Files

Save all outputs to the working directory:

File	Purpose
extracted_text.json	Raw text extraction (machine use)
concept_index.json	Structured concept index with stats (machine use)
READING_PLAN_AND_CONCEPT_INDEX.md	Human-readable deliverable

The markdown file is the primary deliverable. Structure it as:

1. Corpus Overview — Table of all papers with page counts, year, and focus
2. Cross-Document Concept Index — Tiered concept tables with page references
3. Reading Plan — The sequenced plan with phases, steps, and rationale
4. Quick Reference — 30-minute path and topic deep-dive tables

Adapting the Concept Keywords

The concept keyword list must be tailored to the corpus topic. When the user provides a topic or you can infer it from the PDF titles:

1. Start with 15-20 obvious domain terms
2. After initial text extraction, scan the first few pages of each paper for frequently recurring technical terms
3. Expand the keyword list to 40-60 terms
4. Include both the full term and common abbreviations (e.g., "retrieval augmented generation" AND "RAG")

Edge Cases

• Scanned PDFs (no extractable text): PyMuPDF will return empty pages. Report which PDFs failed extraction and suggest OCR alternatives.
• Very large PDFs (500+ pages): Cap per-page text at 2000 chars. Process in batches if needed.
• Mixed languages: The concept detection is English-focused. Note if non-English content is detected.
• Non-research PDFs (books, manuals): The section detection still works. Adjust concept keywords to match the domain.

What NOT to Do

• Do not use vector embeddings or RAG for this task. The whole point is structured extraction.
• Do not try to summarize entire papers in a single LLM call — work at the section/page level.
• Do not skip the concept index and jump straight to a reading plan — the index is what makes the plan principled rather than arbitrary.
• Do not generate reading plans without exact page references — vague "read paper X" recommendations are useless.