Use when reviewing or remediating PostgreSQL query and index performance against a stated performance budget. Produces an index audit (B-tree, hash, GIN, GiST, BRIN, partial, expression, covering), EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)-driven query review, pg_stat_statements hot-query identification, partitioning validation (range/list/hash), N+1 and join-order remediation, and autovacuum and bloat posture. Do not use for initial schema design, new-table modeling, migration authoring, replication topology, or backup strategy; use postgres-schema-and-migration, postgres-replication-and-ha-readiness, or postgres-backup-and-operational-readiness instead.
Use when reviewing or remediating PostgreSQL query and index performance against a stated performance budget. Produces an index audit (B-tree, hash, GIN, GiST, BRIN, partial, expression, covering), EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)-driven query review, pg_stat_statements hot-query identification, partitioning validation (range/list/hash), N+1 and join-order remediation, and autovacuum and bloat posture. Do not use for initial schema design, new-table modeling, migration authoring, replication topology, or backup strategy; use postgres-schema-and-migration, postgres-replication-and-ha-readiness, or postgres-backup-and-operational-readiness instead.
Postgres Indexing and Query Optimization
When to use
Invoke when a PostgreSQL workload has a stated or suspected performance problem, when validating that an existing schema meets performance budgets before a scale event, when auditing indexes for redundancy or bloat, or when remediating slow queries, N+1 access, or bad join orders.
Do not use for: greenfield schema modeling or new-table design (use postgres-schema-and-migration), migration authoring, replication or HA topology (use postgres-replication-and-ha-readiness), backup/restore (use postgres-backup-and-operational-readiness), or access-control hardening (use postgres-security-and-data-access-hardening).
Inputs
Required:
Connection to the target database or a representative copy with production-like data distribution and volume.
The performance budget in scope: per-query latency targets, throughput expectations, or the specific slow path. Sourced from performance-architecture.md where it exists.
The access patterns the database serves, from data-architecture.md or backend-architecture.md.
Optional:
pg_stat_statements output or permission to enable it.
Existing index inventory and DDL.
Known slow queries, application traces, or APM data.
Table size, growth rate, and write/read ratio per hot table.
Partitioning strategy already in place.
Autovacuum settings and current bloat estimates.
Operating rules
Measure before changing. Every recommendation is backed by EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) on production-like data, not by intuition or row counts alone.
Tie every change to a budget. An optimization with no stated latency or throughput target to satisfy is not in scope — escalate to performance for the budget.
Every proposed index names the query pattern it serves, expected selectivity, the scan type it replaces, and its write-amplification and storage cost. Reject indexes that cannot name a query.
Find and remove redundant, unused, and duplicate indexes before adding new ones. An unused index is a write tax with no benefit.
Prefer query and schema-access fixes over index sprawl. An N+1, a missing join predicate, or a non-sargable expression is fixed at the query, not papered over with an index.
Index creation on a live table uses CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY and is treated as a migration: it needs the same lock analysis and migration-plan.md discipline as postgres-schema-and-migration. Hand off the migration mechanics to that skill.
Validate partitioning against actual pruning. A partition scheme that does not enable partition pruning for the dominant queries is a liability, not a win.
Autovacuum and bloat are performance concerns. A correct index on a bloated table still underperforms; include vacuum/bloat posture in the review.
Do not change random_page_cost, work_mem, or planner settings globally to fix one query without an ADR — prefer per-query or per-role scoping.
If a fix requires a schema change (new column, denormalization, materialized view), pause and raise it as a handoff to postgres-schema-and-migration with the measured justification; do not author the migration here.
Output contract
Findings and recommendations MUST conform to:
naming-conventions — index names are explicit and snake_case; no anonymous or ORM-default names introduced.
observability-standards — query latency, slow-query, and bloat signals are named as observable metrics, not one-off manual checks.
deployment-standards — any index DDL is CONCURRENTLY, backwards-compatible, and gated as a migration handoff.
Upstream contract: performance-architecture.md is the source of truth for latency and throughput budgets. data-architecture.md and backend-architecture.md are the source of truth for which access patterns are legitimate. If no budget exists for the path under review, pause and raise an ADR candidate against performance rather than optimizing to an invented target.
Process
Establish the budget and the workload. Confirm the per-query latency or throughput target from performance-architecture.md. Confirm the legitimate access patterns from data-architecture.md / backend-architecture.md. If either is missing, pause and escalate.
Enable and read pg_stat_statements. Rank queries by total time, mean time, and call count. Identify the hot set: the queries that consume the budget.
Inventory existing indexes. Detect duplicates, overlapping prefixes, unused indexes (pg_stat_user_indexes with low/zero scans), and invalid indexes. Mark candidates for removal.
For each hot query, capture EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) on production-like data. Identify the cost driver: seq scan on a large table, bad row estimate, nested-loop blowup, sort spill to disk, bitmap heap recheck, or repeated execution (N+1).
Classify each finding: missing index, wrong index type, non-sargable predicate, stale statistics, bad join order, missing partition pruning, N+1 from the application, or bloat-induced degradation.
For index findings, choose the right index type deliberately: B-tree (equality/range/sort), hash (equality only), GIN (composite/array/jsonb/full-text), GiST (geometric/range/nearest-neighbor), BRIN (large append-only naturally-ordered tables), partial (skewed predicates), expression (computed predicates), or covering (INCLUDE) for index-only scans. Justify the choice against the query.
For query findings, propose the rewrite: make predicates sargable, fix join order or add the missing join predicate, replace OFFSET pagination with keyset pagination, batch N+1 access, or introduce a materialized view (flagging the schema-change handoff).
For partitioning findings, validate that the dominant queries carry the partition key and achieve pruning; recommend range/list/hash adjustments or partition-wise join enablement. Validate constraint-exclusion vs runtime pruning behavior.
For statistics and planner findings, recommend ANALYZE, increased default_statistics_target on skewed columns, extended statistics (CREATE STATISTICS) for correlated columns, or per-query/per-role planner scoping — never undocumented global GUC changes.
For bloat and autovacuum findings, quantify table and index bloat, recommend autovacuum tuning (scale factor, cost limit) per hot table, and flag tables needing REINDEX CONCURRENTLY or pg_repack.
Produce the optimization report: ranked findings, the measured before-state (EXPLAIN output and pg_stat_statements numbers), the recommended change, the expected after-state, the budget it satisfies, and the cost (write amplification, storage, lock).
Outputs
Required:
query-optimization-report.md: ranked findings, each with measured before-state, classification, recommended change, expected after-state, the budget it satisfies, and the cost.
Index change list: indexes to add (with type, definition, and query justification) and indexes to drop (with evidence of redundancy or non-use), all marked as migration handoffs.
Conditional, when applicable:
Query rewrites with side-by-side EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) before/after.
Partitioning validation note with pruning evidence.
Autovacuum and bloat remediation plan per hot table.
ADR candidate(s) for global planner setting changes or materialized-view introduction.
Output rules:
Every recommendation cites measured evidence; no recommendation rests on row counts or intuition alone.
Every added index names a query; every dropped index names its non-use evidence.
Index DDL and schema changes are handed off to postgres-schema-and-migration, not authored here.
The report states the budget each change is in service of.
Quality checks
Every finding is backed by EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) on production-like data.
Every recommendation names the performance budget it is in service of.
Every proposed index names its query pattern, type rationale, selectivity, and write/storage cost.
Redundant, duplicate, and unused indexes are identified with pg_stat_user_indexes evidence before any index is added.
N+1, non-sargable predicates, and bad join orders are remediated at the query, not masked with indexes.
Partitioning recommendations include pruning evidence for the dominant queries.
Autovacuum/bloat posture is assessed for every hot table in scope.
Any index DDL or schema change is handed off to postgres-schema-and-migration as a CONCURRENTLY migration with lock analysis — not authored in this skill.
Global planner/GUC changes, if recommended, have an ADR candidate and are scoped per-query or per-role where possible.
Post-change verification re-captures EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements and shows movement toward budget.
Verify. Apply recommendations against the production-like copy, re-capture EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) and pg_stat_statements deltas, and confirm each change moves the metric toward its budget. Hand off any required index DDL or schema change to postgres-schema-and-migration as a migration with lock analysis.
