用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/akornmeier/claude-config --skill defense-in-depth-validation命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Transform an OpenSpec change phase into UI-ready build prompts through a 3-step pipeline. PRD generation, then UX specification, then build-order prompts. Use when starting implementation of an OpenSpec feature phase, or when the user mentions "openspec-to-prompts", "feature pipeline", or asks to convert a spec phase to implementation prompts. Requires an openspec change-id and phase number as input.
Refine and clarify PRD documentation through structured questioning using the visual AskUserQuestion tool
Convert a rough MVP idea into a demo-grade PRD (Steps 1-7)
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | Defense-in-Depth Validation |
| description | Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible |
| when_to_use | when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers |
| version | 1.1.0 |
| languages | all |
When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks.
Core principle: Validate at EVERY layer data passes through. Make the bug structurally impossible.
Single validation: "We fixed the bug" Multiple layers: "We made the bug impossible"
Different layers catch different cases:
Purpose: Reject obviously invalid input at API boundary
function createProject(name: string, workingDirectory: string) {
if (!workingDirectory || workingDirectory.trim() === '') {
throw new Error('workingDirectory cannot be empty');
}
if (!existsSync(workingDirectory)) {
throw new Error(`workingDirectory does not exist: ${workingDirectory}`);
}
if (!statSync(workingDirectory).isDirectory()) {
throw new Error(`workingDirectory is not a directory: ${workingDirectory}`);
}
// ... proceed
}
Purpose: Ensure data makes sense for this operation
function initializeWorkspace(projectDir: string, sessionId: string) {
if (!projectDir) {
throw new Error('projectDir required for workspace initialization');
}
// ... proceed
}
Purpose: Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts
async function gitInit(directory: string) {
// In tests, refuse git init outside temp directories
if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test') {
const normalized = normalize(resolve(directory));
const tmpDir = normalize(resolve(tmpdir()));
if (!normalized.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
throw new Error(`Refusing git init outside temp dir during tests: ${directory}`);
}
}
// ... proceed
}
Purpose: Capture context for forensics
async function gitInit(directory: string) {
const stack = new Error().stack;
logger.debug('About to git init', {
directory,
cwd: process.cwd(),
stack,
});
// ... proceed
}
When you find a bug:
Bug: Empty projectDir caused git init in source code
Data flow:
Project.create(name, '')WorkspaceManager.createWorkspace('')git init runs in process.cwd()Four layers added:
Project.create() validates not empty/exists/writableWorkspaceManager validates projectDir not emptyWorktreeManager refuses git init outside tmpdir in testsResult: All 1847 tests passed, bug impossible to reproduce
All four layers were necessary. During testing, each layer caught bugs the others missed:
Don't stop at one validation point. Add checks at every layer.