菜单
Cross-functional organizational health check combining signals from all C-suite roles. Scores 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale with drill-down recommendations. Use when assessing overall company health, preparing for board reviews, identifying at-risk functions, or when user mentions org health, health check, or health dashboard.
| name | org-health-diagnostic |
| description | Cross-functional organizational health check combining signals from all C-suite roles. Scores 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale with drill-down recommendations. Use when assessing overall company health, preparing for board reviews, identifying at-risk functions, or when user mentions org health, health check, or health dashboard. |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"version":"1.0.0","author":"Alireza Rezvani","category":"c-level","domain":"organizational-health","updated":"2026-03-05T00:00:00.000Z","python-tools":"health_scorer.py","frameworks":"health-benchmarks"} |
Eight dimensions. Traffic lights. Real benchmarks. Surfaces the problems you don't know you have.
org health, organizational health, health diagnostic, health dashboard, health check, company health, functional health, team health, startup health, health scorecard, health assessment, risk dashboard
python scripts/health_scorer.py # Guided CLI — enter metrics, get scored dashboard
python scripts/health_scorer.py --json # Output raw JSON for integration
Or describe your metrics in natural language:
"Run an org health check" — paste your key metrics or answer prompts "Score our [financial|revenue|product|engineering|people|ops|security|market] health" — single-dimension deep dive
What it measures: Can we fund operations and invest in growth?
Key metrics:
What it measures: Are customers staying, growing, and recommending us?
Key metrics:
What it measures: Do customers love and use the product?
Key metrics:
What it measures: Can we ship reliably and sustain velocity?
Key metrics:
What it measures: Is the team stable, engaged, and growing?
Key metrics:
What it measures: Are we executing our strategy with discipline?
Key metrics:
What it measures: Are we protecting customers and maintaining compliance?
Key metrics:
What it measures: Are we winning in the market and growing efficiently?
Key metrics:
Each dimension is scored 1-10 with traffic light:
Overall Health Score:
Weighted average by company stage (see references/health-benchmarks.md for weights).
| If this dimension is red... | Watch these dimensions next |
|---|---|
| Financial Health | People (freeze hiring) → Engineering (freeze infra) → Product (cut scope) |
| Revenue Health | Financial (cash gap) → People (attrition risk) → Market (lose positioning) |
| People Health | Engineering (velocity drops) → Product (quality drops) → Revenue (churn rises) |
| Engineering Health | Product (features slip) → Revenue (deals stall on product) |
| Product Health | Revenue (NRR drops, churn rises) → Market (CAC rises; referrals dry up) |
| Operational Health | All dimensions degrade over time (execution failure cascades everywhere) |
ORG HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC — [Company] — [Date]
Stage: [Seed/A/B/C] Overall: [Score]/10 Trend: [↑ Improving / → Stable / ↓ Declining]
DIMENSION SCORES
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💰 Financial 🟢 8.2 Runway 14mo, burn 1.6x — strong
📈 Revenue 🟡 5.8 NRR 104%, pipeline thin (1.8x coverage)
🚀 Product 🟢 7.4 NPS 42, DAU/MAU 38%
⚙️ Engineering 🟡 5.2 Debt at 30%, MTTR 3.2h
👥 People 🔴 3.8 Attrition 24%, eng morale low
🔄 Operations 🟡 6.0 OKR 65% completion
🔒 Security 🟢 7.8 SOC 2 Type II complete, 0 incidents
📣 Market 🟡 5.5 CAC rising, win rate dropped to 22%
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
TOP PRIORITIES
🔴 [1] People: attrition at 24% — engineering velocity will drop in 60 days
Action: CHRO + CEO to run retention audit; target top 5 at-risk this week
🟡 [2] Revenue: pipeline coverage at 1.8x — Q+1 miss risk is high
Action: CRO to add 3 qualified opps within 30 days or shift forecast down
🟡 [3] Engineering: tech debt at 30% of sprint — shipping will slow by Q3
Action: CTO to propose debt sprint plan; COO to protect capacity
WATCH
→ People → Engineering cascade risk if attrition continues (see dimension interactions)
You don't need all metrics to run a diagnostic. The tool handles partial data:
references/health-benchmarks.md — benchmarks by stage (Seed, A, B, C)scripts/health_scorer.py — CLI scoring tool with traffic light outputSystematic performance profiling for Node.js, Python, and Go applications. Identifies CPU, memory, and I/O bottlenecks, generates flamegraphs, analyzes bundle sizes, optimizes database queries, runs load tests with k6 and Artillery. Always measures before and after. Use when investigating a slow endpoint, planning a performance budget, or hunting a memory leak in production.
Design and ship production-ready MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers from OpenAPI contracts instead of hand-written tool wrappers. Python and TypeScript support, schema validation, safe evolution. Use when exposing an existing API as an MCP server, building tool integrations for Claude or Codex or Cursor, or scaffolding an MCP project from scratch.
Generate pragmatic CI/CD pipelines from detected project stack signals — fast baseline generation, repeatable checks, environment-aware deployment stages. Use when setting up CI for a new project, refactoring existing pipelines, or standardizing deployment workflows across multiple repos.
Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.
Use when a security incident has been detected or declared and needs classification, triage, escalation path determination, and forensic evidence collection. Covers SEV1-SEV4 classification, false positive filtering, incident taxonomy, and NIST SP 800-61 lifecycle.
ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use when planning internal audits, executing audits, classifying findings, preparing for external audits, or managing an audit program.