Skip to main content

am-will/gooey-pi

SkillsMP 已收集 am-will/gooey-pi 中的 46 个 Skill。打开任一 Skill 可查看来源和详情。

最近记录的来源活动
SkillsMP 收录数据更新
已收集 skills
46
GitHub 星标
854
GitHub Forks
63

这个仓库中的 skills

2 个职业分类 · 已分类 9%

已展示 40 / 46 个已收集 Skill。

职业分类
未分类
描述

Launch and drive the GooeyPi desktop (Electron) app to prove user-facing behavior — sidebar navigation, Settings, and Capabilities — capturing screenshots and ARIA snapshots. Reach for this when verifying a GooeyPi UI change or confirming the app still works…

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in. Use for /architect, 'architect this', 'design this', or non-trivial work where jumping to code would lock in the wrong shape.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Use for "automate me", "create/update/refresh my -mode skill", "turn/capture my preferences or working style into a skill", or wanting agents to follow how the user works. Drafts or revises a personal -mode skill via create-skill + unslop, optionally pulling…

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you…

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions via show-me-your-work. Use for…

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which package owns this", "is this the right layer"). Explains subsystem architecture, runtime flow, onboarding…

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Spawn Comment Sicko, fix accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work. Use for poteto, /poteto-mode, or requests to work in this style.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when wiring validation, error handling, or framework adapters. Concentrate guards at system boundaries (CLI, config, network, external APIs); trust internal types and keep business logic in pure functions.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply to any non-trivial work, not just bulk work: edits, migrations, analyses, checks. Build the tool that does it or proves it (codemod, script, generator, or a skill your subagents follow) instead of working by hand. The tool is the artifact a reviewer can…

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when you catch yourself writing the same instruction a second time, or notice a recurring correction. Encode the rule as a lint, metadata flag, runtime check, or script instead of more text.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when product, UX, or feature-scope tradeoffs come up. Choose user delight over implementation convenience; ship fewer polished features over more rough ones.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when debugging. Trace each symptom to its root cause and fix it there; reproduce first, ask why until you reach it, resist nil-check guards that silence crashes.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply before writing logic: choosing core types and data structures, sequencing scaffold-vs-feature work, asking what concurrent actors share. Get the data structures right so downstream code becomes obvious.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when context is filling up: large outputs, long files, repeated reads, fan-out planning. Route bulk to subagents; keep summaries in the main thread, not raw payloads.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when refactoring, evaluating diff size, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias toward deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when introducing a new internal API while old callers still exist. Migrate callers and delete the old API in the same wave instead of preserving compatibility layers.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when reviewing or shaping code that's hard to trace. Count layers between question and answer, and hidden state in the reader's head; collapse one-caller wrappers and shrink mutable scope.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when writing stateful logic, or when code branches a lot or repeats a shape assumption across files. Encode the domain in a structure instead of scattered conditionals.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when tempted to ask 'should I do X?' on reversible work. Proceed, present the result, let the human course-correct after the fact; reserve confirmation for irreversible actions.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply after completing a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact (run the feature, read the actual value, inspect the diff), not a proxy, self-report, or 'it compiles.'

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when integrating a new requirement into an existing design. Redesign as if the requirement had been a foundational assumption from day one, instead of bolting it on.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when concurrent actors might write to the same file, branch, key, or state object. Eliminate the sharing first; serialize structurally only when one shared writer is a real invariant.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply to multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and to how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a verifiable state, check each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself to a…

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when sequencing an addition, refactor, or rewrite. Remove dead weight, redundant validators, and stub references first, then build on the simpler base.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Apply when designing types, reviewing a function signature, or writing code in any statically-typed language. Make illegal states unrepresentable, brand semantic primitives, parse external data at boundaries, refuse to lie to the compiler, exhaust variants,…

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Reconstruct your recent working context from your own chat history, live state, and the shared record (user reports, prior fixes, incidents), then hand back a tight current-state brief. Use for 'recall my work on X', 'catch me up', 'what have I been working…

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Spawn three parallel review subagents over the active transcript, surface learnings, and route each to a concrete edit on an existing skill. Use when the user says reflect.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Configure which models pstack uses per role. Detects your available models and writes an always-applied rule that overrides the skill defaults. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", or changing pstack's model choices.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result). Local by default; commit it when a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. Use for /show-me-your-work, autonomous or…

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Fan out N parallel workers, drain them, and return one report. Use for /swarm, 'swarm this', or parallel coverage, races, gauntlets, and exploration.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Layered technical-writing standard: Diátaxis structure, Google developer style sentences, STE instruction rules, Global English syntax. Use for /technical-writing or when writing or reviewing docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

TypeScript best practices. Use when reading or editing any .ts or .tsx file.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Cut AI tells from any writing. Must always apply.

原文语言:英语

更新
职业分类
未分类
描述

Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat,…

原文语言:英语

更新
已展示 40 / 46 个已收集 Skill。