| name | cursor-delegate |
| description | Delegate a coding task to the Cursor Agent CLI (`cursor-agent`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Cursor — phrasings like "have Cursor implement X", "delegate this to Cursor", "run it through Cursor Agent", or "use Cursor to implement/fix/refactor" — or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Cursor while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating. |
| license | MIT |
| compatibility | Requires the `cursor-agent` CLI installed and authenticated, Node 18+, and git. The optional `--add-dir` flag requires cursor-agent 2026.07.23 or newer. The orchestrating agent must be able to run shell commands and read files. Shell examples assume bash/zsh (macOS/Linux, or Git Bash/WSL on Windows). |
| metadata | {"version":"0.5.0"} |
Cursor Delegate
You are the orchestrator. Hand a bounded coding task to a separate implementer — the Cursor
Agent CLI — then review what it produced and land it yourself. You write the brief and own the
judgment; Cursor does the typing in its own session; you verify and commit.
The loop needs only a shell command and file access, so any comparable orchestrator can drive it.
When NOT to use this
- The task is small enough to do inline; delegation overhead is not worth it.
- The
cursor-agent CLI is not installed or authenticated (run cursor-agent login).
- You want to write the code yourself, or you only need Cursor's opinion on code you wrote (a
--read-only dispatch covers that — see below — but a plain review may not need delegation at all).
Prerequisites (check once)
cursor-agent --version succeeds. If not, follow the installer for your platform at
cursor.com/cli, inspect what it will run, and authenticate with
cursor-agent login.
cursor-agent status shows you logged in.
- You are in (or will point
--cd at) the target git repository. The relay passes --trust, so
point it only at repositories you trust.
Choose the model
Omitting --model uses your Cursor default (usually auto — Cursor picks). To pin one, pass
--model <name> with a name from the account's live cursor-agent models output — select from that
list rather than inventing a name. Parameterized forms like <name>[context=1m,effort=high] are
forwarded as-is. The model that actually served the run is recorded as resolvedModel in
result.json.
The loop
Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 require judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.
1. Write the brief
Cursor sees only the text you send plus what it can inspect in the workspace — no chat history or
shared context. Include the goal, current state, what to change, what to leave untouched, the
project's actual gates, and a report contract. Tell Cursor not to commit. Keep one task per
brief. See references/writing-the-brief.md.
2. Dispatch
Use the bundled helper. It wraps cursor-agent -p, feeds the brief on stdin, captures the
structured event stream, and writes result.json. (<skill-dir> is the installed folder containing
this SKILL.md.)
node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
The child process's cwd pins the workspace. On Cursor 2026.07.23 or newer, use repeatable
--add-dir flags only for extra workspace directories. The relay writes artifacts under the system
temp dir by default and never commits. See
references/dispatch-and-poll.md.
3. Wait for completion
The helper blocks until Cursor finishes. Run it with the orchestrator's background-command facility,
or background it in the shell and poll for result.json. A pre-run usage error exits 2 and writes no
result; a missing cursor-agent exits 127 and writes status: "cursor_agent_unavailable".
Trust process state and the working tree over a progress display. Completion means the process exited
and result.json exists. Cursor's full report is the finalMessage field in result.json (also
printed in full on stdout between the report markers).
Windows + hooks caveat: if the user has Cursor hooks configured (~/.cursor/hooks.json, or
Claude Code PreToolUse hooks, which cursor-agent imports), dispatching from a Git Bash (MSYS)
console makes cursor-agent feed PowerShell-syntax hook wrappers to bash, so every command Cursor
tries to run is blocked — edits still land, gates do not run. Dispatch from a PowerShell or cmd
console instead. Details: references/dispatch-and-poll.md.
4. Review — do not trust the self-report
Treat Cursor's final message and gate claims as claims:
- Re-run the project's gates yourself.
- Read the diff against the brief, starting with
touchedFiles.
- Run relevant guard skills if installed.
- Round-trip migrations and grep for dangling references after removals or renames.
See references/review-and-land.md.
5. Land it
The implementer edits the working tree; the orchestrator commits. Commit only after the gates
pass and the diff holds. If rework is needed, send a delta brief with --resume-last or
--session <id>, then review again.
Autonomy and permissions
A fresh run defaults to write-capable with --force: Cursor runs commands without approval
unless your Cursor config explicitly denies them, so ordinary gates (tests, linters, builds) run
headlessly. --no-force keeps the run write-capable but withholds automatic command approval;
commands that require approval are refused because a headless run cannot prompt. --read-only
switches to Cursor's plan mode (read-only analysis, no edits, no --force). The relay always
passes --trust to keep headless runs from stalling on the workspace-trust prompt, which is why
--cd must only ever point at repositories you trust. Pass --sandbox enabled or --sandbox disabled only when you need to override Cursor's sandbox for that dispatch. The requested value is
recorded as sandbox in result.json; it does not claim what Cursor actually applied. The permission
mode Cursor reports is recorded as permissionMode; inspect touchedFiles and the diff after every
run.
Read-only second opinions
--read-only doubles as a clean way to get an adversarial second opinion with no write risk:
dispatch a brief that lists the agreed points, then each contested point with both positions, and ask
Cursor to defend or concede each — deliverable in its final message, touching no files.
Authorization model
Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing
verified, gate-passing work is the agreed contract. Two limits remain: surface, don't absorb
(report Cursor's design decisions, defensible-but-unasked turns, and non-blocking nitpicks) and
stop for scope changes (if correct completion needs going beyond the brief, ask instead of
expanding the mandate). See references/review-and-land.md.
References
- references/writing-the-brief.md — structure, report contract,
real gates, and delta briefs.
- references/dispatch-and-poll.md — flags, artifacts,
result.json, polling, and failure recovery.
- references/review-and-land.md — review checklist, commit boundary,
and rework through Cursor sessions.
- references/multi-task-queues.md — sequential queues, constraint
carry-forward, progress tracking, and the final coherence pass.