一键导入
gene-symbol-normalizer
Normalize gene symbols, aliases, and species context before downstream lookup or analysis.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Normalize gene symbols, aliases, and species context before downstream lookup or analysis.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | gene_symbol_normalizer |
| description | Normalize gene symbols, aliases, and species context before downstream lookup or analysis. |
| category | bio/literature |
| version | 1 |
| requires_tools | ["ensembl_api","uniprot_api","python_repl"] |
| requires_network | true |
| user_invocable | true |
| tags | ["gene-symbol","alias","identifier","normalization"] |
| aliases | ["normalize_gene_symbol","gene_name_cleaner"] |
| species | any |
| modality | literature |
| stage | utilities |
| stability | stable |
| safety_level | low |
Resolve gene aliases, outdated symbols, species ambiguity, and mixed capitalization before any downstream biological interpretation.
Use this skill when the user provides one or more gene names that may be aliases, old symbols, or mixed-species identifiers.
ensembl_api as the primary source for canonical symbols, aliases, and organism mapping.uniprot_api as a cross-check when alias families, protein naming, or species assignments remain unclear.python_repl to assemble a compact normalization table with input term, canonical symbol, species, matched source, and ambiguity or confidence note.ensembl_api and uniprot_api results supported each normalization.Manage the BioAPEX current-feature workflow from scoping through review and completion
Turn an analysis request into a Slurm-ready execution plan with commands, resource assumptions, and job structure.
Scale a buffer recipe to a target volume and compute component masses/volumes.
Save a fetched summary or document to the knowledge base for later retrieval (e.g. after PubMed/UniProt lookup).
Interpret scRNA clusters using marker genes and suggest cell type or state.
Critically evaluate a perturbation hypothesis — challenge assumptions, propose negative controls, and flag confounders.