用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/benjam3n/reasoningtool --skill cga命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | cga |
| description | Learn your cognitive process, then run it at superhuman scale: more information, more depth, more alternatives. |
| output | {"format":"prose"} |
Input: $ARGUMENTS
You have a way of analyzing things. It works. But you can only hold so much in your head, go so deep, consider so many alternatives.
This procedure learns your cognitive process, then runs it at superhuman scale: more information, more depth, more alternatives. Same quality of judgment, just amplified.
Before amplifying, understand what to amplify:
How do you currently approach this type of problem?
What heuristics do you use?
Where do you hit limits?
Convert the elicited process into explicit steps:
COGNITIVE MODEL:
Domain: [what type of problem]
Process:
1. [First thing you do] — looking for [what]
2. [Second thing] — looking for [what]
3. [Decision rule] — if [condition] then [action]
...
Heuristics:
- If [pattern], then [conclusion] (confidence: [H/M/L])
- Red flag: [signal] → [implication]
- Green flag: [signal] → [implication]
Quality check: [how you know the result is good]
Which dimensions of the process benefit from scale?
| Dimension | Current Limit | Amplified Target | Value of Amplification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breadth (options considered) | [N] | [10x N] | [H/M/L] |
| Depth (analysis per option) | [levels] | [more levels] | [H/M/L] |
| Combinations (interactions) | [few] | [all pairs/triples] | [H/M/L] |
| Scenarios (what-if) | [2-3] | [exhaustive] | [H/M/L] |
| Time horizon | [short] | [extended] | [H/M/L] |
| Data processing | [sample] | [full dataset] | [H/M/L] |
Focus amplification on HIGH value dimensions.
Apply the formalized process at scale:
Amplification generates more output than you'd normally produce. Filter:
COGNITIVE AMPLIFICATION:
Domain: [problem type]
Process modeled: [summary of your approach]
Amplification results:
- Options analyzed: [N] (vs your typical [M])
- Depth reached: [levels]
- Surprises found: [N]
Key findings your normal process would have missed:
1. [finding] — discovered via [which amplification dimension]
2. [finding]
Validated intuitions:
1. [what your gut said that scaled analysis confirms]
Challenged intuitions:
1. [what your gut said that scaled analysis questions]
Recommendation: [what to do with these findings]