用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/benjam3n/reasoningtool --skill fj命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Route any input through a branching question tree to narrow down the optimal response strategy before writing. Two stages — PERCEIVE (classify input) then ACT (select response). Covers all prompt types.
Generate exhaustive guesses about user input using ALL search methods with coverage tracking. Guessing is SEARCH through possibility space. Tracks space created vs space covered to ensure comprehensive exploration.
Systematically evaluate and select from a set of guesses, options, or possibilities. Combines ARAW analysis with prioritization to determine which guesses are strong, weak, actionable, or eliminable.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | fj |
| description | Most goal journey work focuses on SUCCESS paths. This maps the patterns of sustainable failure. |
| output | {"format":"prose"} |
Input: $ARGUMENTS
Most goal journey work focuses on SUCCESS paths. But failure is ALSO a goal people pursue — often unconsciously.
This isn't just "anti-flourishing" in the simple sense (one-time destruction). It's the sophisticated patterns of SUSTAINABLE FAILURE — failing in ways that allow continued failing.
Many stories already map these patterns: tragedies, noir, addiction narratives, self-sabotage arcs, "almost but never quite" stories. A complete goal journey system must include failure journeys.
What type of sustainable failure is at play?
| Pattern | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Sisyphus | Repeated effort, repeated failure, no learning | Trying the same diet every January |
| Icarus | Success → overreach → catastrophe → repeat | Building up then burning down businesses |
| Tantalus | Almost reaching the goal, never quite | "Almost" getting promoted, year after year |
| Penelope | Building and unbuilding endlessly | Making progress then undoing it |
| Cassandra | Seeing the problem clearly, unable to change | Knowing what to do but not doing it |
| Orpheus | Succeeding until looking back | Self-sabotage at the moment of success |
| Ouroboros | The "solution" recreates the problem | Stress-eating about weight gain |
Every sustainable failure has a loop structure:
FAILURE LOOP:
Trigger: [what initiates the cycle]
↓
Response: [the habitual action]
↓
Short-term relief: [why it feels good/right in the moment]
↓
Long-term cost: [what it actually produces]
↓
New trigger: [how the cost creates the next trigger]
↓
(repeat)
Map the specific loop:
Sustainable failure always serves a function. Ask:
What does failing PROTECT you from?
What does failing PROVIDE?
What would change if you SUCCEEDED?
This is the hardest step. The hidden payoff is usually invisible to the person experiencing it.
For each failure pattern, there's a counter-move:
| Pattern | Counter | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Sisyphus | Change the approach, not the effort | Break the assumption that more effort = success |
| Icarus | Set and enforce limits BEFORE success | Constraints at the peak, not at the bottom |
| Tantalus | Investigate the "almost" — is the goal real? | May need to redefine what you actually want |
| Penelope | Burn the boats — make un-doing harder | Remove the option to retreat |
| Cassandra | Get external accountability | Someone else enforces what you can see but won't do |
| Orpheus | Define success BEFORE achieving it | Know what "done" looks like so you don't self-sabotage |
| Ouroboros | Break the loop at the TRIGGER, not the response | Eliminate what starts the cycle |
For the specific failure loop identified:
Best intervention: the one that's smallest but breaks the loop permanently.
FAILURE JOURNEY ANALYSIS:
Pattern: [which archetype]
Loop: [trigger] → [response] → [relief] → [cost] → [trigger]
Hidden payoff: [what failing provides/protects]
What success would require giving up: [the real cost of change]
Counter-journey:
Intervention point: [where to break the loop]
Specific action: [what to do differently]
Support needed: [what help is required]
Warning: [what will try to pull you back into the pattern]