用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/benjam3n/reasoningtool --skill mpg命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Route any input through a branching question tree to narrow down the optimal response strategy before writing. Two stages — PERCEIVE (classify input) then ACT (select response). Covers all prompt types.
Generate exhaustive guesses about user input using ALL search methods with coverage tracking. Guessing is SEARCH through possibility space. Tracks space created vs space covered to ensure comprehensive exploration.
Systematically evaluate and select from a set of guesses, options, or possibilities. Combines ARAW analysis with prioritization to determine which guesses are strong, weak, actionable, or eliminable.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | mpg |
| description | Handler for goals that require navigating institutions, groups, politics, and multiple stakeholders. |
| output | {"format":"prose"} |
Input: $ARGUMENTS
Handler for goals that require navigating institutions, groups, politics, and multiple stakeholders with different interests. These goals can't be achieved through individual action alone. They require coalition building, persuasion, negotiation, and understanding power dynamics.
For each relevant stakeholder:
| Stakeholder | Interest | Position | Power | Influence | Movability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [who] | [what they want] | [for/against/neutral] | [H/M/L] | [who they influence] | [H/M/L] |
Position categories:
For each key stakeholder:
Coalition strategy:
For each coalition member:
| Person | Current Position | Target Position | What They Need | Your Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [name] | [current] | [desired] | [what moves them] | [specific request] |
Different stakeholders need different messages:
| Stakeholder Type | Message Focus | Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Data-driven | Evidence, ROI, metrics | "The numbers show..." |
| Relationship-driven | Trust, testimonials, consensus | "People we respect are doing..." |
| Authority-driven | Precedent, hierarchy, mandate | "Leadership has indicated..." |
| Risk-averse | Safety, reversibility, pilot | "Low risk way to test..." |
| Innovation-driven | Novelty, competitive advantage | "First-mover opportunity..." |
One message per stakeholder, tailored to what they care about.
When stakeholders oppose:
MULTI-PARTY GOAL ANALYSIS:
Goal: [what needs to happen]
Decision-maker: [who ultimately decides]
Decision process: [how the decision is made]
Stakeholder map:
| Stakeholder | Position | Power | Strategy |
|------------|----------|-------|----------|
| [name] | [for/against/neutral] | [H/M/L] | [approach] |
Coalition status:
Champions: [N] | Supporters: [N] | Neutral: [N] | Skeptics: [N] | Opponents: [N]
Strategy:
1. [first move — who, what, when]
2. [second move]
3. [third move]
Key risk: [biggest obstacle]
Fallback: [if primary approach fails]