基于 SOC 职业分类
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/benjam3n/reasoningtool --skill snp命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
Route any input through a branching question tree to narrow down the optimal response strategy before writing. Two stages — PERCEIVE (classify input) then ACT (select response). Covers all prompt types.
Generate exhaustive guesses about user input using ALL search methods with coverage tracking. Guessing is SEARCH through possibility space. Tracks space created vs space covered to ensure comprehensive exploration.
Systematically evaluate and select from a set of guesses, options, or possibilities. Combines ARAW analysis with prioritization to determine which guesses are strong, weak, actionable, or eliminable.
| name | snp |
| description | The future is uncertain. Develop multiple plausible futures and prepare strategies that work across them. |
| output | {"format":"prose"} |
Input: $ARGUMENTS
The future is uncertain. Instead of trying to predict the one future, scenario planning develops multiple plausible futures and prepares strategies that work across them.
This isn't forecasting (predicting what will happen) but foresight (preparing for what might happen).
List the forces that could shape the future, then classify:
| Force | Predictable? | Impact | Key Uncertainty |
|---|---|---|---|
| [force] | Yes/No | H/M/L | [what we don't know] |
Select the 2 most impactful uncertainties that are genuinely unpredictable. These become your scenario axes.
Rules for good axes:
Cross the two uncertainties to create 4 scenarios:
Uncertainty 1: HIGH
|
Scenario B | Scenario A
[name] | [name]
|
Uncertainty 2: LOW ------+------ Uncertainty 2: HIGH
|
Scenario D | Scenario C
[name] | [name]
|
Uncertainty 1: LOW
For each of the 4 scenarios, flesh out:
Quality check:
For each strategy option you're considering:
| Strategy | Scenario A | Scenario B | Scenario C | Scenario D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [option 1] | Win/Lose/OK | Win/Lose/OK | Win/Lose/OK | Win/Lose/OK |
| [option 2] | Win/Lose/OK | Win/Lose/OK | Win/Lose/OK | Win/Lose/OK |
Strategy types:
Actions that are valuable regardless of which scenario unfolds:
For each scenario, define:
SCENARIO PLANNING:
Decision: [what needs to be robust]
Time horizon: [years]
Key uncertainties: [axis 1] × [axis 2]
Scenarios:
| Scenario | Name | Key Feature | Probability Estimate |
|----------|------|-------------|---------------------|
| A | [name] | [defining characteristic] | [rough %] |
| B | [name] | [defining characteristic] | [rough %] |
| C | [name] | [defining characteristic] | [rough %] |
| D | [name] | [defining characteristic] | [rough %] |
Strategy assessment:
| Strategy | A | B | C | D | Robustness |
|----------|---|---|---|---|-----------|
| [option] | [+/-/0] | [+/-/0] | [+/-/0] | [+/-/0] | [score] |
No-regret moves: [actions good in all scenarios]
Recommended approach: [robust/adaptive/hedged/big bet]
Monitoring: [key indicators to watch]