一键导入
spec-check
Review an implementation spec for contradictions, redundancy, and completeness. Use when asked to review or check a spec against the codebase.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Review an implementation spec for contradictions, redundancy, and completeness. Use when asked to review or check a spec against the codebase.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Orchestrates the full code-to-Figma rebuild workflow for a web application. Thin dispatcher that delegates all substantial work to subagents and reads only small summary files. Runs eight tracked phases (phase0a, phase0b, phase1, phase2, phase2_5, phase3, phase4, phase5). Never calls use_figma or get_screenshot directly.
Subagent for figma-from-code Phase 0a. Discovers the complete component architecture of a web application via browser crawling and static code scanning. Produces a topologically-sorted build order and inspects the target Figma file for existing pages and components.
Standalone validator for a completed figma-from-code rebuild. Navigates the live app, screenshots each component in its natural context, and compares against the matching Figma variant. Also used by the Phase 5 orchestrator agent as a reference for the Component App Map and comparison scripts.
Subagent for figma-from-code Phase 0b. Discovers all Lucide icons and SVG file assets imported across the codebase via static analysis. Extracts SVG markup and maps which components use which icons. No dev server or Figma access needed.
Subagent for figma-from-code Phase 1. Creates Figma variable collections from the project's CSS and Tailwind tokens, extracts the CSS-variable-to-Figma-variable-ID map, and pre-computes all CSS colors as sRGB values.
Subagent for figma-from-code Phase 2. Creates the Figma file page skeleton, foundations documentation frames, and container frames needed by later phases. Requires variable collections to already exist.
| name | spec-check |
| description | Review an implementation spec for contradictions, redundancy, and completeness. Use when asked to review or check a spec against the codebase. |
Please review this spec. Does it make sense? Does it contradict itself? Is it overly redundant? Does it have what's needed to be implemented?
Please check against the existing codebase.
Add any questions you have for me in a ## Questions section at the end of the document. Number the questions so they are easy to reference. I will fill out answers inline.