Skip to main content

idor

Hunt Insecure Direct Object Reference (CWE-639) — missing authorization checks on object IDs. Covers horizontal vs vertical privilege escalation, UUID vs integer guessing, and GraphQL introspection-driven IDOR discovery.

跳到安装

来源信息

仓库
BitterSecurity/Decepticon
最近来源活动
2026年6月2日 17:42
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
5,565
分支
1,053

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
idor
description
Hunt Insecure Direct Object Reference (CWE-639) — missing authorization checks on object IDs. Covers horizontal vs vertical privilege escalation, UUID vs integer guessing, and GraphQL introspection-driven IDOR discovery.
metadata
{"subdomain":"web-exploitation","when_to_use":"idor insecure direct object reference cwe-639 authorization horizontal vertical privilege escalation uuid integer graphql introspection"}
# IDOR Hunting Playbook IDOR is the #1 source of bug bounty payouts because it's simple, ubiquitous, and scanners can't find it (authorization is business logic). Every endpoint that takes an object ID is a candidate. ## 1. Sources - URL path segments: `/api/users/123/invoices/456` - Query string: `?user_id=123` - JSON body fields: `{"orderId": 123}` - Headers used as auth scope: `X-Tenant-ID`, `X-Customer-Id` - JWT claims that downstream handlers *trust*: `sub`, `tenant`, `role` - WebSocket subscription filters - GraphQL arguments (`user(id: 123)`) ## 2. Audit workflow ### Step 1 — enumerate object-handling endpoints ```bash # REST grep -rE '@(Get|Post|Put|Delete|Patch)Mapping.*\{[a-zA-Z]+Id\}' /workspace/src # Spring grep -rE 'router\.(get|post|put|delete)\([^)]*:id' /workspace/src # Express grep -rE '@app\.route\([^)]*<[a-z]+:' /workspace/src # Flask grep -rE 'resources?\s+:[a-z]+' /workspace/src # Rails # GraphQL grep -rE 'type Query|type Mutation' /workspace/src grep -rE '\w+\(id: ID' /workspace/src ``` ### Step 2 — for each endpoint, answer three questions 1. **Does it check who the caller is?** (auth middleware / decorator) 2. **Does it check whether the object belongs to the caller?** (ownership check / tenant filter in the query) 3. **Does it check whether the caller's role permits the action?** (RBAC / policy engine) A "no" to question 2 = horizontal IDOR (read/write other users' data). A "no" to question 3 = vertical IDOR (regular user → admin action). ### Step 3 — ownership-check grep patterns ```bash # Django: should have .filter(user=request.user) on the queryset grep -rE 'Model\.objects\.get\(pk=' /workspace/src | grep -v 'user=request\.user' # Rails: should have current_user.posts.find(params[:id]) grep -rE 'Post\.find\(params\[:id\]\)' /workspace/src # Spring: should have @PreAuthorize("#id == principal.id") grep -rE 'findById\(id\)' /workspace/src | xargs -I{} grep -L '@PreAuthorize\|@PostAuthorize' ``` ## 3. High-yield patterns ### GraphQL IDOR via introspection ```bash curl -X POST https://target.com/graphql \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"query":"{ __schema { types { name fields { name args { name type { name } } } } } }"}' ``` Any query field that takes an `id` arg and lacks a custom directive (`@auth(requires: OWNER)`) is a candidate. Mutations are even higher value — they often forget ownership checks. ### JWT claim trust If the handler pulls `user_id` from `request.user.id` but also accepts a `user_id` query param as override for "admin features", check whether the override path enforces the admin claim. Frequently broken. ### Mass assignment via hidden fields ```python User.objects.create(**request.POST.dict()) # allows POST'ing is_staff=true ``` ## 4. PoC workflow Two-account diff: 1. Create account A, note `sessionA` cookie and `objectA` ID. 2. Create account B, note `sessionB` cookie and `objectB` ID. 3. `curl -b sessionA /api/objects/<objectB>` — should 403. 4. If it returns 200 with objectB data → confirmed IDOR. For vertical escalation: 1. Normal user cookie `sessionU`. 2. Call admin endpoint: `curl -b sessionU -X POST /api/admin/users/<victim>/role -d '{"role":"admin"}'`. 3. Watch the response code + subsequent `GET /api/users/<victim>`. ## 5. UUID vs integer Sequential integer IDs make IDOR trivial. UUIDv4 makes it harder *but*: - UUIDs leak in logs, emails, public URLs, support tickets - Many apps use UUIDv1 (time-based) which is partially predictable - Enumeration through a listing endpoint still works - Some APIs accept both UUID and numeric ID (dual primary key) Always test UUID endpoints — the "it's a UUID so it's safe" assumption is one of the richest hunting grounds. ## 6. Success signals - HTTP 200 where you expected 403/404 - Response body contains PII/data belonging to the other account - Role field changed on victim account - Subsequent admin action now permitted for low-priv session Negative control: same request with your own account's ID. Should return 200 with identical shape. Anything that returns 404 for your own account but 200 for someone else's is a confirmation signal. ## 7. Default CVSS | Variant | Vector | Score | |--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|-------| | Horizontal read (other user PII) | AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | 6.5 | | Horizontal write (modify other user) | AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N | 8.1 | | Vertical escalation to admin | AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H | 9.9 | | Unauth → any user profile | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | 7.5 | ## 8. Chain promotion IDOR is a classic chain *starter*: - IDOR → other user's password reset token → account takeover - IDOR → admin role grant → every other admin-only vuln unlocked - IDOR → internal API key → SSRF pivots Weight 0.5 for authenticated IDOR, 0.3 for unauth.
在 GitHub 查看