用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/bouclem/skills --skill swiftui-performance-audit命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | swiftui-performance-audit |
| description | Audit SwiftUI performance issues from code review and profiling evidence. |
| risk | safe |
| source | Dimillian/Skills (MIT) |
| date_added | 2026-03-25 |
Use this skill to diagnose SwiftUI performance issues from code first, then request profiling evidence when code review alone cannot explain the symptoms.
references/code-smells.md.references/profiling-intake.md.references/report-template.md.Collect:
@State, @Binding, environment dependencies, and observable models.Ask the user to classify the issue if possible:
For the full profiling intake checklist, read references/profiling-intake.md.
Focus on:
ForEach.body or view builders.GeometryReader, or preference chains.Use references/code-smells.md for the detailed smell catalog and fix guidance.
Provide:
If code review does not explain the issue, ask for runtime evidence:
Use references/profiling-intake.md for the exact checklist and collection steps.
Apply targeted fixes:
ForEach and lists.body into derived state updated from inputs, model-layer precomputation, memoized helpers, or background preprocessing. Use @State only for view-owned state, not as an ad hoc cache for arbitrary computation.equatable() only when equality is cheaper than recomputing the subtree and the inputs are truly value-semantic.Use references/code-smells.md for examples, Observation-specific fan-out guidance, and remediation patterns.
Ask the user to re-run the same capture and compare with baseline metrics. Summarize the delta (CPU, frame drops, memory peak) if provided.
Provide:
Use references/report-template.md when formatting the final audit.
references/profiling-intake.mdreferences/code-smells.mdreferences/report-template.mdreferences/ as they are supplied by the user.references/optimizing-swiftui-performance-instruments.mdreferences/understanding-improving-swiftui-performance.mdreferences/understanding-hangs-in-your-app.mdreferences/demystify-swiftui-performance-wwdc23.md