菜单
这个仓库中的 skills
SkillsMP 已收集 brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills 中的 3,969 个 Skill。打开任一 Skill 可查看来源和详情。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills已展示 40 / 3,969 个已收集 Skill。
Use when deciding whether an anthropology project fits Current Anthropology (CA) and which article type to target. CA is the transnational, all-fields Wenner-Gren journal whose Major Articles receive the CA✩ comment-and-reply Treatment, so the test is…
原文语言：英语
Use when handling research ethics, consent, community accountability, and data/transparency for a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript — informed consent, anonymization, protection of vulnerable interlocutors, heritage and repatriation obligations, and what…
原文语言：英语
Use when starting or navigating any Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript as the entry point. Routes to the right CA sub-skill based on lifecycle stage, subfield (sociocultural, archaeology, biological, linguistic), and article type (Major Article under the…
原文语言：英语
Use when drafting or polishing a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript so it reads across all subfields for a worldwide audience, follows CA house style (free-format accepted; final files use Chicago author-date), fits the article-type word caps (Major Article…
原文语言：英语
Use when stating assumptions, identification, and analytical properties (bias, consistency, efficiency, asymptotics, validity conditions) of a method in a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) paper. Audits the theory and proof economy; does not design the…
原文语言：英语
Use when building the real-data empirical illustration for a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) paper — a demonstration that the method changes a substantive conclusion, not a decorative example. Designs the illustration; does not derive properties or…
原文语言：英语
Use when sharpening the core methodological claim of a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) paper — the new estimator/design/diagnostic and exactly what it fixes versus existing methods. Frames and bounds the contribution; does not derive its properties or…
原文语言：英语
Use when responding to a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) decision letter — drafting the point-by-point response and revision plan for properties, simulations, the empirical illustration, software, and exposition under SMR's verbatim-comment response…
原文语言：英语
Use when designing the Monte Carlo simulation study for a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) paper — data-generating processes, competing methods, performance metrics, and the regimes where the method wins or breaks. Designs the simulation; does not derive…
原文语言：英语
Use when preparing the released software, code, data, and reproducibility materials for a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) paper — a usable package plus scripts that recreate every table, figure, and simulation, and the SMR data-and-code availability…
原文语言：英语
Use when designing tables and figures for a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) paper — self-contained simulation grids, method-comparison tables, diagnostic plots, and equation/notation exhibits in ASA-styled format. Designs exhibits; does not write prose…
原文语言：英语
Use when deciding whether a project clears the Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) bar — a genuine methodological contribution (develop, evaluate, or critically assess a method), not an application dressed as method. Screens fit and scope; does not derive…
原文语言：英语
Use when sequencing a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) manuscript from method-contribution fit through derivation and properties, Monte Carlo simulation, real-data empirical illustration, released software, ScholarOne submission, double-anonymized…
原文语言：英语
Use when stress-testing the reasoning of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — turning stated propositions into a valid, warranted argument that survives rival theories and counter-cases. Develops and audits the argument; it does NOT define the concepts…
原文语言：英语
Use when specifying the scope, domain, and limits of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript's theory — stating where it holds, where it does not, and what it does NOT claim. Bounds the theory as a contribution; it does NOT build the concepts…
原文语言：英语
Use when building the figures and typologies of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — mechanism diagrams, process models, 2x2 typologies, and concept maps that carry theoretical work (never regression tables or data plots). Designs conceptual exhibits; it…
原文语言：英语
Use when articulating the theoretical contribution of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — naming the new way of seeing it provides and differentiating it from prior theory. Frames the contribution; it does NOT build the theory…
原文语言：英语
Use when locating a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript in a tradition and conversation — naming whose theory you extend, challenge, or synthesize, and avoiding sibling-journal misattribution. Positions the argument; it does NOT build the concepts…
原文语言：英语
Use when writing the response document for a Sociological Theory (ST) Revise & Resubmit — structuring point-by-point replies that show the theory was genuinely strengthened, not just defended. Drafts the response; revise the manuscript's theory FIRST…
原文语言：英语
Use when you need to understand Sociological Theory (ST)'s double-anonymous peer review and interpret a decision letter focused on conceptual novelty and logical soundness. Explains the process and decision types; it does NOT draft the response document (that…
原文语言：英语
Use when building the actual theory for a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — turning a positioned problem into defined concepts, explicit mechanisms, internally consistent propositions, and scope conditions. Constructs the theory; it does NOT stress-test…
原文语言：英语
Use when deciding whether an idea is a genuine theoretical problem and a fit for Sociological Theory (ST) rather than an empirical study or a review essay. Screens the problem and venue fit; it does NOT build the theory (soctheory-theory-construction) or…
原文语言：英语
Use when drafting or polishing a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript so it reads as an argument for a broad theoretical readership, follows the ASA Style Guide, and fits ST's length cap (max ~14,500 words inclusive of footnotes, references, tables, figures,…
原文语言：英语
Use when checking that an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review covers the literature even-handedly — across labs, paradigms, and rival theories — weighs evidence by credibility, and avoids self-promotion. Audits coverage and fairness; it does not…
原文语言：英语
Use when systematically gathering, reading, and structuring the literature for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so coverage is comprehensive and current. Builds the evidence base; it does not design the analytical spine…
原文语言：英语
Use when imposing an analytical structure or taxonomy on a psychology literature for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review — the "spine" that turns a reading list into an argument about the field. Designs the framework; it does not gather the…
原文语言：英语
Use when getting a topic in front of the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editorial Committee, suggesting a topic/author, or shaping an accepted invitation into an agreed scope. Handles the commissioning relationship; it does not test topic maturity…
原文语言：英语
Use when responding to the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editor's or Committee's peer-review letter on a delivered review, or to copyediting/proof queries. Handles the post-delivery revision loop; it does not run the pre-delivery preflight…
原文语言：英语
Use when designing the summary tables and conceptual figures for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review — the who-found-what tables and the one framework diagram that carries the spine. Designs exhibits; it does not design the spine itself…
原文语言：英语
Use when judging whether a psychology topic is mature, important, and synthesis-ready enough to warrant an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review. Tests topic fit; it does not pitch the topic to the Committee (arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning) or…
原文语言：英语
Use when documenting the literature search and making any embedded meta-analysis reproducible for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review. Covers search transparency, meta-analytic rigor, and open materials; it does not run the narrative search…
原文语言：英语
Use when deciding which arpsych-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
原文语言：英语
Use when drafting or polishing prose for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so it lands the authoritative-yet-accessible house voice for a broad psychology readership. Shapes voice, abstract, and intro; it does not design the spine…
原文语言：英语
Use when appraising the credibility of the studies a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece synthesizes and calibrating comprehensiveness, balance, and fair treatment of competing camps — including reform-minded but evidence-based critique. Weighs…
原文语言：英语
Use when systematically gathering and synthesizing literature across psychology sub-areas for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) integrative review, theoretical statement, or meta-science piece — coverage discipline, and for meta-science the…
原文语言：英语
Use when imposing an analytical or conceptual structure on a body of psychology research for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) integrative review or theoretical statement — the unifying argument or "spine" that turns a reading list into a claim…
原文语言：英语
Use when shaping a proposal for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) contribution — the proposal route (required for cooperative and miscellaneous pieces, optional for stand-alone), what a proposal contains, and how invited/special-issue work…
原文语言：英语
Use when responding to a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and reviewer decision letter — coverage gaps, balance/fairness complaints, framework/argument asks, accessibility, and open-science requests. Drafts the response and revision plan;…
原文语言：英语
Use when running the final submission preflight for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) manuscript via the ScholarOne/Manuscript Central portal — contribution-type/proposal route, abstract limit, APA formatting, open-science deposits, cover-letter…
原文语言：英语
Use when building exhibits for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece — the conceptual/framework figure, who-found-what summary tables, and (for meta-science) practice-prevalence or replication exhibits. Designs review/synthesis exhibits in APA…
原文语言：英语