canonical/ds-docs-meta-prompting

brand-voice-evaluation

Evaluates documentation against the team's brand guidelines. Use when reviewing docs for tone, terminology, sentence structure, and phrasing consistency.

原文语言：英语

completeness-evaluation

Evaluates whether documentation sections have substantive content. Use when checking whether planned sections are complete, thin, placeholders, or missing.

原文语言：英语

copy-editing-evaluation

Evaluates grammar, spelling, and formatting in design systems' documentation. Use when checking mechanics like spelling, punctuation, heading hierarchy, and list formatting.

原文语言：英语

explore-existing-ds-docs

Explore Canonical's Vanilla Framework design system documentation. Covers 49 UI constructs and 26 concepts including their properties, anatomy, usage guidelines, and relationships. Use when answering questions about Vanilla constructs, concepts, design…

原文语言：英语

figma-context

Pulls design context from Figma via the Figma desktop MCP server during documentation workflows. Use when a user provides a Figma URL, selects a node in the Figma desktop app, or references existing designs during discovery, drafting, or review.

原文语言：英语

readability-evaluation

Scores and evaluates documentation readability using Flesch-Kincaid metrics and qualitative analysis. Use when reviewing docs for sentence length, passive voice, jargon, and reading level.

原文语言：英语

brand-voice-evaluation

Evaluates documentation against the team's brand guidelines. Use when reviewing docs for tone, terminology, sentence structure, and phrasing consistency.

原文语言：英语

completeness-evaluation

Evaluates whether documentation sections have substantive content. Use when checking whether planned sections are complete, thin, placeholders, or missing.

原文语言：英语

copy-editing-evaluation

Evaluates grammar, spelling, and formatting in design systems' documentation. Use when checking mechanics like spelling, punctuation, heading hierarchy, and list formatting.

原文语言：英语

brand-voice-evaluation

Evaluates documentation against the team's brand guidelines. Use when reviewing docs for tone, terminology, sentence structure, and phrasing consistency.

原文语言：英语

completeness-evaluation

Evaluates whether documentation sections have substantive content. Use when checking whether planned sections are complete, thin, placeholders, or missing.

原文语言：英语

copy-editing-evaluation

Evaluates grammar, spelling, and formatting in design systems' documentation. Use when checking mechanics like spelling, punctuation, heading hierarchy, and list formatting.

原文语言：英语

brand-voice-evaluation

Evaluates documentation against the team's brand guidelines. Use when reviewing docs for tone, terminology, sentence structure, and phrasing consistency.

原文语言：英语

completeness-evaluation

Evaluates whether documentation sections have substantive content. Use when checking whether planned sections are complete, thin, placeholders, or missing.

原文语言：英语

copy-editing-evaluation

Evaluates grammar, spelling, and formatting in design systems' documentation. Use when checking mechanics like spelling, punctuation, heading hierarchy, and list formatting.

原文语言：英语

brand-voice-evaluation

Evaluates documentation against the team's brand guidelines. Use when reviewing docs for tone, terminology, sentence structure, and phrasing consistency.

原文语言：英语

completeness-evaluation

Evaluates whether documentation sections have substantive content. Use when checking whether planned sections are complete, thin, placeholders, or missing.

原文语言：英语

copy-editing-evaluation

Evaluates grammar, spelling, and formatting in design systems' documentation. Use when checking mechanics like spelling, punctuation, heading hierarchy, and list formatting.

原文语言：英语

readability-evaluation

Scores and evaluates documentation readability using Flesch-Kincaid metrics and qualitative analysis. Use when reviewing docs for sentence length, passive voice, jargon, and reading level.

原文语言：英语