research-arxiv

name	research-arxiv
description	Find and summarize recent arxiv papers on a research topic. Use when user mentions "arxiv", "recent papers", "what's new in research on", "latest research", or asks about academic papers on a topic.

Research Arxiv

Find recent arxiv papers on a topic, summarize findings, and identify trends.

Workflow

Phase 1: Research

Gather information from two sources. Research each source independently, then aggregate findings.

Note: Arxiv research does not require repository analysis — only web_researcher and docs_researcher are used.

From Community Content (web_researcher)

• Search arxiv.org for recent papers on the topic (last 1-2 years)
• Find blog posts, Twitter threads, and discussions about key papers
• Identify influential authors and research groups in the area
• Find survey papers or literature reviews if they exist
• Community opinions on which papers are most impactful
• Conference presentations or talks related to the topic

From Official Documentation (docs_researcher)

• Fetch paper abstracts and metadata from arxiv.org
• Get citation counts and related papers where available
• Find the papers' key claims and contributions from abstracts
• Identify the datasets, benchmarks, or methods referenced
• Check for companion project pages or official blog posts

Practical Articles Research (web_researcher — separate search)

Run a dedicated second search specifically targeting practitioner-oriented content that translates this research area into practice. Use queries like "practical {topic}", "{topic} for engineers", "{topic} real-world applications", "{topic} implementation guide", "applying {topic} in production".

Look for:

• Blog posts that translate academic findings into engineering practice
• "What this research means for practitioners" style articles
• Open-source implementations and practical libraries based on the research
• Industry adoption stories and production case studies
• Tutorials that implement techniques from the papers
• Practitioner critiques — what works in theory vs. in practice
• Cost, latency, and scalability considerations from real deployments

Phase 2: Structure

Organize content into progressive levels. references/progressive-learning.md is the source of truth.

You MUST create exactly 5 levels in this order:

1. Level 1: Field Overview
2. Level 2: Key Papers
3. Level 3: Methods & Approaches
4. Level 4: Trends & Open Problems
5. Level 5: Getting Involved

Do NOT merge, skip, or rename levels. The level names above are FINAL — use them exactly. The reference file provides depth and content guidelines only, not level names.

Phase 3: Output

Generate the research folder.

Output Format

Create the folder in the current working directory (./research_output/arxiv-{topic}/) containing:

research_output/arxiv-{topic}/
├── README.md                # Overview and how to use this research summary
├── papers.md                # Detailed paper summaries with links and key findings
├── synthesis.md             # Cross-paper analysis, themes, and connections
├── practical-takeaways.md   # What practitioners can use from this research area
└── learning-path.md         # Main content following the five levels

practical-takeaways.md Guidelines

This file bridges the gap between academic research and engineering practice. It should be sourced primarily from the dedicated practical articles research, NOT rehashed from synthesis.md or papers.md. Structure it with sections like:

• What This Research Means for Practitioners — plain-language summary of why engineers should care
• Ready-to-Use Implementations — libraries, tools, or frameworks that already implement these techniques
• Adoption Guide — which findings are production-ready vs. still experimental
• Implementation Patterns — code snippets or architecture patterns based on the research
• Theory vs. Practice — where academic results hold up in production and where they don't
• Cost & Feasibility — compute requirements, latency impact, and scaling considerations from real deployments

Include code snippets, comparison tables, or decision criteria where the source material supports them.