用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus --skill idea-chorus命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Optional divergent-then-convergent dialogue for fuzzy ideas. Invoked from the idea skill as a prelude to structured elaboration; produces one ElaborationRound of decision-point Q&A and returns control. Never writes files, never posts comments, never validates elaboration.
Chorus AI Agent collaboration platform — overview, common tools, setup, and routing to stage-specific skills.
Final ship-time review of an Idea's aggregate code change — the whole feature across all its tasks, not one task. Read the integrated code, check cross-task integration / architecture / security / regression / coverage, run tests. Invoke after the last task of an idea-rooted proposal is verified; ends with a VERDICT comment on the Idea.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | idea-chorus |
| description | Chorus Idea workflow — claim ideas, run elaboration rounds, and prepare for proposal creation. |
| license | AGPL-3.0 |
| metadata | {"author":"chorus","version":"0.16.4","category":"project-management","mcp_server":"chorus"} |
This skill covers the Ideation stage of the AI-DLC workflow: claiming Ideas, running structured elaboration rounds to clarify requirements, and preparing for Proposal creation.
Tool namespace: Chorus tools are exposed by the connected MCP server under a
mcp__chorus__prefix on dsh (e.g.mcp__chorus__chorus_get_idea). Bare names are used below for readability — prependmcp__chorus__when invoking. Seechorusfor the full rule.
Ideas are the starting point of the AI-DLC pipeline. Humans (or Admin agents) create Ideas describing what they need. The PM Agent claims an Idea, runs elaboration to clarify requirements, and then moves on to proposal-chorus to create a Proposal with document and task drafts.
Idea status lifecycle (3 stored states):
open --> elaborating --> elaborated
All post-elaboration progress (planning, building, verifying, done) is derived from the state of linked Proposals and Tasks. No agent should set Idea status directly beyond elaboration -- all transitions are side-effects of claiming, releasing, or completing elaboration.
Idea Management:
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
chorus_pm_create_idea | Create a new idea in a project (on behalf of humans). Optional parentUuid derives a child idea from an existing same-project idea (single-parent lineage). |
chorus_edit_idea | Edit an existing idea's title, description, and/or lineage parent. parentUuid: another same-project idea to reparent under, null to detach to top-level, omit to leave unchanged (cycle-checked + same-project). Single-parent weak lineage — a parent shows a read-only +N derived rollup but never blocks either idea's flow. Records an "edited" activity and signals presence. |
chorus_claim_idea | Claim an open idea (open -> elaborating) |
chorus_release_idea | Release a claimed idea (elaborating -> open) |
chorus_pm_assign_idea | Assign an idea to an agent (must hold idea:write) or a user, on a human's behalf — the counterpart to chorus_claim_idea (self-claim). Silently takes over any existing assignee; an open idea moves to elaborating, any other status is preserved. Optional instanceUuid pins an agent assignment to a specific AgentInstance (agent-only). Assigning to an agent wakes it best-effort (offline still persists the assignment); assigning to a user notifies them with no daemon wake. Requires idea:admin. |
chorus_move_idea | Move an Idea to a different Project. Cascade-migrates the Idea and its full lineage subtree (all descendant Ideas; the moved root is detached from any parent left behind), all linked Proposals (any status), all materialized Documents and Tasks, and all related Activities atomically. Comments, TaskDependency, AcceptanceCriterion, AgentSession, SessionTaskCheckin, Notification history, and Task assignees are NOT modified. Returns moved: { ideas, proposals, documents, tasks, activities } counts. Requires idea:write only — no project-level checks. |
Requirements Elaboration:
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
chorus_pm_start_elaboration | Generate an elaboration round (first, follow-up, or appended-after-resolution) |
chorus_pm_validate_elaboration | Mark the whole elaboration complete (requires idea:admin; requires human confirmation first) |
chorus_pm_skip_elaboration | Skip elaboration for trivially clear Ideas |
chorus_answer_elaboration | Submit answers for an elaboration round (roundUuid optional — auto-locates the active round) |
chorus_get_elaboration | Get full elaboration state (rounds, questions, answers) |
Shared tools (checkin, query, comment, search, notifications): see chorus
chorus_checkin()
Review your persona, current assignments, and pending work counts.
chorus_get_available_ideas({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>" })
Or check existing assignments:
chorus_get_my_assignments()
Claiming automatically transitions the Idea to elaborating status:
chorus_claim_idea({ ideaUuid: "<idea-uuid>" })
Before elaborating, understand the full picture:
Read the idea in detail:
chorus_get_idea({ ideaUuid: "<idea-uuid>" })
Read existing project documents (for context, tech stack, conventions):
chorus_get_documents({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>" })
chorus_get_document({ documentUuid: "<doc-uuid>" })
Review past proposals (to understand patterns and standards):
chorus_get_proposals({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>", status: "approved" })
Check existing tasks (to avoid duplication):
chorus_list_tasks({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>" })
Read comments on the idea for additional context:
chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "idea", targetUuid: "<idea-uuid>" })
Make attaching external references a reflex, not an afterthought. While gathering context you will often surface external links that are evidence for this Idea — a precedent issue or PR, a reference implementation, official documentation, a paper or blog post. The moment you see one, attach it as a reference artifact. References are read back inline by chorus_get_idea / chorus_get_proposal / chorus_get_task, so they carry the "why" forward to whoever picks up the proposal or task next. (Tool names are bare here per the namespace note above — prepend mcp__chorus__ when invoking on dsh.)
Prefer attaching at creation time via the inline references[] param on chorus_pm_create_idea (and later chorus_pm_create_proposal / chorus_create_tasks) rather than a post-hoc chorus_add_reference. Attaching at create means the evidence is present from the first read; use chorus_add_reference only when the link surfaces after the entity already exists.
Pick the type that fits the link:
type | Use for |
|---|---|
docs | Official documentation — framework / API / library reference |
repo | A reference implementation or source repository |
issue_pr | An issue or pull-request thread — precedent, prior art, the delivering PR |
paper_blog | A paper or blog post — background or design rationale |
Example — a new localization Idea, attaching the precedent PR and the framework docs inline at creation:
chorus_pm_create_idea({
projectUuid: "<project-uuid>",
title: "Add Portuguese (pt) locale",
content: "...",
references: [
{ type: "issue_pr", url: "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/411",
title: "PR #411 — prior locale work (precedent to mirror)" },
{ type: "docs", url: "https://next-intl.dev/docs/routing",
title: "next-intl routing docs (locale registration)" }
]
})
If the Idea is fuzzy and you'd struggle to enumerate concrete multi-choice questions, offer the user a brainstorm prelude before structured elaboration.
dsh note: use
ask_user_questionin interactive sessions. WhenCHORUS_DAEMON_HEADLESS=1, record this choice as an elaboration question, add an@mentioncomment, and end the turn."This idea is still fuzzy. Do you want to (A) brainstorm directions together first, or (B) go straight to structured elaboration? Reply A or B."
brainstorm-chorus skill. See brainstorm-chorus for the dialogue cadence and synthesis rules — do NOT re-implement them here.When brainstorm-chorus returns, you own the lifecycle decision (the brainstorm skill deliberately leaves it to you):
chorus_pm_validate_elaboration to mark the elaboration complete. (Requires idea:admin — see Step 5.6 if your key is pm_agent-preset.)chorus_pm_start_elaboration again to open a structured Round 2. Pick the depth yourself — do NOT re-prompt the user.Either outcome ends Step 4.5; skip Step 5.
Every Idea should go through elaboration. Skip only when requirements are completely unambiguous (e.g., bug fix with clear steps). Elaboration improves Proposal quality and reduces rejection cycles.
You may skip elaboration, but you MUST obtain human permission first before calling chorus_pm_skip_elaboration. Use ask_user_question interactively. In daemon-headless mode, add an @mention comment requesting the decision and end the turn. Never skip on your own judgment alone.
chorus_pm_skip_elaboration({
ideaUuid: "<idea-uuid>",
reason: "Bug fix with clear reproduction steps"
})
Elaboration is a loop, not a straight line. Steps 2–5 below are one round. Keep looping back to
chorus_pm_start_elaboration(a new round) until every open question is settled, then resolve once in Step 6. You re-enter the loop whenever:
- the answers to a round derive new questions or surface a contradiction/gap, or
- at the resolve gate (Step 5d / Step 6) the human raises a new concern or correction.
Each new round is just another
chorus_pm_start_elaborationcall — there is no separate "follow-up" flag, and you do not resolve until the loop is genuinely done. Round cap is 10.
Determine depth based on idea complexity:
"minimal" — 2-4 questions (small features, minor enhancements)"standard" — 5-10 questions (typical new features)"comprehensive" — 10-15 questions (large features, architectural changes)Create elaboration questions:
Note: Do NOT include an "Other" option in your questions. Treat the free-text path as always available — a user may answer any question with free text instead of picking an option.
chorus_pm_start_elaboration({
ideaUuid: "<idea-uuid>",
depth: "standard",
questions: [
{
id: "q1",
text: "What user roles should have access to this feature?",
category: "functional",
options: [
{ id: "a", label: "All users" },
{ id: "b", label: "Admin only" },
{ id: "c", label: "Role-based (configurable)" }
]
}
]
})
Collect answers. In interactive dsh, present the choices with ask_user_question. When CHORUS_DAEMON_HEADLESS=1, add an @mention comment directing the requester to the created elaboration round, end the turn, and continue only after a later wake reports answers.
I have a few questions to clarify this idea. Please reply with your choice for each (you can also write a free-text answer):
1. Which new locales should be prioritized for V1?
a) Japanese only — single locale for initial release
b) Japanese + Korean — two East Asian locales
(or describe your own)
2. ...
After the user replies, map their answers back to option IDs and call chorus_answer_elaboration. If the user gave a free-text answer that doesn't match an option, set selectedOptionId: null and put their text in customText.
Submit answers:
chorus_answer_elaboration({
ideaUuid: "<idea-uuid>",
roundUuid: "<round-uuid>",
answers: [
{ questionId: "q1", selectedOptionId: "c", customText: null },
{ questionId: "q2", selectedOptionId: null, customText: "Custom hybrid approach" }
]
})
Answer format:
selectedOptionId: "a", customText: nullselectedOptionId: "a", customText: "additional context"Elaboration as audit trail: Even if the user discusses requirements with you outside the formal elaboration flow, record key decisions as elaboration rounds so they are persisted and visible to the team.
Question categories: functional, non_functional, business_context, technical_context, user_scenario, scope
Ideas can form a single-parent forest: an idea may have one parent (parentUuid), establishing a weak lineage. "Weak" means the parent only shows a read-only +N derived rollup of its direct children — it never blocks or alters either idea's elaboration/proposal/task flow, and a parent is always a full first-class idea (it can have its own content, proposals, and tasks).
When a new direction surfaces (during elaboration, brainstorm, or review), decide where it belongs:
chorus_pm_create_idea with parentUuid, or chorus_edit_idea with parentUuid to reparent an existing idea) when the new direction needs its own elaboration/proposal lifecycle — it is an independent AI-DLC pass.parentUuid) when there is no lineage to the current idea.This is a soft heuristic, not a rule — use judgment. Cycle prevention is automatic: you cannot set a parent that is the idea itself or one of its descendants. Parent and child must be in the same project (cross-project lineage is not supported yet). Deleting a parent re-parents its children to top-level (it never cascades). (Reminder: invoke these as mcp__chorus__chorus_pm_create_idea / mcp__chorus__chorus_edit_idea — see the namespace note at the top of the chorus skill.)
A theme is an idea that only groups related children under a shared direction — it is not a deliverable itself. Set isContainer: true on chorus_pm_create_idea / chorus_edit_idea (or the detail-panel toggle) to make one; it is freely reversible. The one rule that matters: a theme cannot create a proposal — to deliver its direction, derive a child idea (parentUuid = <theme>) and write the proposal on the child. A theme may still elaborate (its elaboration is shared context for children), and its status/progress rolls up from its children. Everything else is self-documented on the tool params.
When a theme is created via the conversational "help me break this into child ideas" entry, don't create children immediately — propose then create: (1) edit the theme + optionally one short scope-elaboration round; (2) propose the candidate children as an elaboration round (chorus_pm_start_elaboration), one single-select question per candidate, for the user to accept/decline in the panel; (3) on the answer re-wake, create each accepted child with chorus_pm_create_idea (parentUuid = <theme>, left in open).
ask_user_question interactively; in daemon-headless sessions route decisions through Chorus and end the turnproposal-chorus to create a Proposal with document and task draftsyolo_requested wake means: drive the WHOLE idea to done via the yolo skill (the full-auto AI-DLC pipeline) — read the idea's current state first and resume from whatever phase it is in, never assuming a fixed stage. Complete through done + the completion report, but never merge or push a PR without explicit human approval.chorusselectedOptionId: null, customText: "your answer" — customText is required when no option is selected
roundUuidis optional onchorus_answer_elaboration. Omit it and the service auto-locates the Idea's single active (pending_answers) round. Pass it explicitly only when you need to target a specific round.
Review answers and confirm with the owner (@mention flow):
After answers are submitted, @mention the answerer (typically the agent's owner) with a summary of your understanding. This prevents misinterpretation before you validate.
a. Get owner info from checkin response (agent.owner) or search:
chorus_search_mentionables({ query: "owner-name" })
b. Post a summary comment on the idea:
chorus_add_comment({
targetType: "idea",
targetUuid: "<idea-uuid>",
content: "@[Owner Name](user:owner-uuid) I've reviewed the elaboration answers. Here's my understanding:\n\n- Key requirement 1: ...\n- Key requirement 2: ...\n\nDoes this match your intent?"
})
c. Wait for confirmation via comments.
d. Based on the response — this is the loop decision point:
chorus_pm_validate_elaboration.chorus_pm_start_elaboration capturing the new questions, collect answers (Steps 2–5 again), and re-confirm. Repeat until the human has no remaining concerns.chorus_pm_start_elaboration for another round before resolving.Resolve the elaboration (the single commit gate — only when the loop is done):
Resolving marks the whole elaboration phase complete — it sets idea.elaborationStatus = "resolved" (Idea → elaborated), which is the gating signal that lets a downstream Proposal be submitted. It is an Idea-level action (takes only ideaUuid, does not target a round). Resolve once, only after the Step 5d loop has fully settled — every derived question answered and the human has no remaining concerns. If anything is still open, go back to chorus_pm_start_elaboration instead of resolving.
Precondition: resolve requires the Idea to have at least one round and every round to be fully answered (none left in
pending_answers). If a round still has open questions, answer it (or it'll be rejected).
⚠️ Human confirmation required. Outside YOLO automation you MUST obtain explicit human confirmation before resolving. Use
ask_user_questioninteractively; in daemon-headless mode request confirmation via an@mentioncomment and end the turn. Never resolve on your own judgment alone.
Permission (N1):
chorus_pm_validate_elaborationrequiresidea:admin. Thepm_agentpreset only grantsidea:write, so a PM-preset agent cannot resolve — it must hand off to anadmin_agent-preset agent (or an admin-preset API key) to perform the resolve. If your key lacksidea:admin, surface this to the human and request the handoff instead of failing silently.
Assignee precondition (N2): the resolving actor must be the Idea's assignee. A separate human reviewer resolving a PM-owned Idea therefore needs both
idea:adminand to be assigned the Idea (claim/reassign it first). Admin permission alone is not enough.
chorus_pm_validate_elaboration({
ideaUuid: "<idea-uuid>"
})
Want a follow-up round instead of resolving? Just call chorus_pm_start_elaboration again — there is no separate "open a round" flag. It works while still elaborating (a normal follow-up round) and, after you've already resolved, as an appended round (isAppended: true) that keeps the Idea elaborated and never blocks an in-flight Proposal. Per-question issue tagging no longer exists.
Check elaboration status at any time:
chorus_get_elaboration({ ideaUuid: "<idea-uuid>" })