| name | incident-bridge-facilitation |
| enabled | true |
| description | Use when performing incident bridge facilitation — guide for running an
effective incident bridge call or war room, covering agenda structure,
facilitation techniques, role assignments, information flow management, and
decision-making frameworks. Ensures bridge calls remain focused, productive,
and lead to faster incident resolution.
|
| required_connections | [{"prefix":"slack","label":"Slack (for incident channel)"}] |
| config_fields | [{"key":"incident_title","label":"Incident Title","required":true,"placeholder":"e.g., Database cluster failover failure"},{"key":"severity","label":"Severity","required":true,"placeholder":"e.g., SEV1"},{"key":"bridge_link","label":"Bridge Call / War Room Link","required":false,"placeholder":"e.g., https://meet.google.com/xxx-yyyy-zzz"}] |
| features | ["INCIDENT"] |
Incident Bridge Facilitation
Incident: {{ incident_title }}
Severity: {{ severity }} | Bridge: {{ bridge_link }}
Bridge Setup Checklist
Opening the Bridge (First 3 Minutes)
The IC opens the bridge with a structured situation report:
"This is [IC name], I am the Incident Commander for [incident title].
Current severity: [SEV level]
Impact: [who is affected and how]
Timeline: [when it started, what we know so far]
Current theory: [what we think is happening]
Active investigation: [who is looking at what]
Roles:
- Tech Lead: [name]
- Comms Lead: [name]
- Scribe: [name]
Ground rules:
1. Mute when not speaking
2. Identify yourself before speaking
3. Direct questions to IC
4. Post findings in the Slack channel, not just verbally
"
Bridge Ground Rules
- Mute by default — unmute only when speaking
- Identify yourself — "This is [name] from [team]" before speaking
- Be concise — state findings in 30 seconds or less
- Write it down — all findings must be posted in the incident channel
- No side conversations — one thread of discussion at a time
- No spectators — if you are not actively contributing, drop off the bridge
- IC controls the floor — IC decides who speaks and when to context-switch
Facilitation Techniques
Round-Robin Status Check (Every 15 min for SEV1)
IC: "Time for a status round. [Tech Lead], what is the current state of investigation?"
IC: "[Service owner], what is the status of [affected service]?"
IC: "[Comms Lead], when was the last customer update?"
IC: "Any new information from anyone else? Speak now."
IC: "Next update in 15 minutes. [Tech Lead], continue with [specific action]."
Decision Framework
When a decision is needed:
- IC states the decision to be made
- IC asks for options (maximum 3)
- IC asks for recommendation from Tech Lead
- IC makes the decision and announces it clearly
- Scribe records the decision with timestamp
Controlling Scope Creep
"That is a valid concern but not related to the current incident.
Please create a ticket for follow-up. Let us stay focused on [current priority]."
Breaking Deadlocks
"We have been discussing this for [X] minutes without consensus.
I am making the call: we will [decision]. If it does not work,
we will revisit in [Y] minutes. Let us move forward."
Information Flow
What Goes in Slack (Written Record)
- All findings and observations
- Graphs, dashboards, and log snippets
- Decisions made and rationale
- Action items with owners
- Timeline entries
What Stays on the Bridge (Verbal Only)
- Real-time coordination
- Brainstorming theories
- Quick questions that need immediate answers
Bridge Etiquette for Participants
- Join promptly when paged — within 5 minutes for SEV1
- Come prepared — check dashboards before joining
- Report findings — do not wait to be asked
- Flag blockers — if you are stuck, say so immediately
- Announce departures — "This is [name], I need to drop. [Handoff person] will cover."
Closing the Bridge
When the incident is mitigated:
IC: "The incident has been mitigated. Here is the summary:
- Root cause: [brief description]
- Mitigation: [what was done]
- Duration: [start to end]
- Remaining actions: [any follow-up items]
Post-incident review will be scheduled within 48 hours.
Thank you all for your response. Bridge is now closed."
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Too many people on the bridge — limit to essential responders only
- No clear IC — always have one person running the call
- Debugging by committee — assign specific investigation tracks to individuals
- Ignoring the clock — track elapsed time and escalate if MTTR targets are at risk
- Verbal-only updates — everything must also be written in the incident channel
Counter-Rationalizations
| Shortcut | Counter | Why |
|---|
| "We can skip some steps for this case" | Adapt the workflow steps, don't skip them | Skipped steps are where incidents and oversights originate |
| "The user seems to already know what to do" | Complete all workflow phases with the user | The workflow catches blind spots that experience alone misses |
| "This is a minor case, full process is overkill" | Scale the process down, don't turn it off | Minor cases become major when unstructured; the process scales, not disappears |
| "I'll fill in the details later" | Complete each section before moving on | Deferred details are forgotten; real-time capture is more accurate |
| "The template output isn't necessary" | Always produce the structured output format | Structured output enables comparison, audit trails, and handoff to other teams |