菜单
Summarizes U.S. transactional legal opinions into executive-ready briefs preserving issues, analysis, conclusions, qualifications, and key authorities. Triggers when asked to summarize a legal opinion, opinion memorandum, legal analysis memo, or produce an executive opinion recap.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub --skill opinion-summary命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
88查企业风险查询与分析工具 —— 专注于中国大陆企业的法务风险查询与分析，覆盖经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法案件等风险类型。支持公司名称、统一社会信用代码、companyId 三种输入方式，自动完成风险查询并输出结构化风险分析总结。 触发场景：仅当用户意图为查询企业风险/法务风险时触发。包括但不限于：企业风险查询、公司风险、经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法风险、风险扫描、风险评估、企业合规审查、风险报告、XX公司有什么风险、XX公司安全吗、XX公司有没有处罚、XX公司被执行过吗。 不触发场景：纯粹的企业信息查询（如查公司、搜企业、工商信息、注册资本、法人代表、股东结构、专利商标等）不应触发本技能，请使用其他 cha88 系列工具。
Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outlines, defending designees, handling objections, and preserving binding admissions for summary judgment or trial. Use when drafting or responding to 30(b)(6) notices, selecting and preparing designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, or triaging scope and privilege disputes. Trigger keywords: 30(b)(6), corporate representative deposition, topic list, designee, notice analysis, deposition objections, corporate admissions.
Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination outlines for binding corporate admissions, analyzes noticed topics for objections, and prepares designees. Use when drafting 30(b)(6) notices, preparing corporate deposition topics, selecting or preparing designees, or defending corporate representative depositions.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | opinion-summary |
| language | en |
| description | Summarizes U.S. transactional legal opinions into executive-ready briefs preserving issues, analysis, conclusions, qualifications, and key authorities. Triggers when asked to summarize a legal opinion, opinion memorandum, legal analysis memo, or produce an executive opinion recap. |
| tags | ["summarization","summary","transactional"] |
Condense a full legal opinion into a professional summary that preserves substance and qualifications. Target 20–30% of original length unless instructed otherwise.
Before summarizing, confirm:
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| Issues Presented | Plain-language statement of each legal question; number if multiple |
| Factual Background | Material facts only; omit narrative detail |
| Legal Analysis | Per issue: controlling standard, key reasoning, decisive facts |
| Conclusion / Recommendation | Outcome, recommendation, reliance conditions |
| Qualifications / Assumptions | Material limits, open questions, reliance assumptions |
| Risk / Alternatives | If addressed: risks, likelihoods, alternatives |
| Authorities | Controlling statutes, regs, or cases; short cites only |
For each issue, populate:
| Issue | Standard | Key Facts | Reasoning | Conclusion |
|---|
[VERIFY].Key changes: consolidated the description into a tighter trigger-focused sentence, removed the verbose template (the Required Sections table + Issue Analysis Table serve the same purpose more concisely), merged the guidelines into a "Pitfalls" section, eliminated the redundant "Compression Checklist" heading in favor of "Compression Rules", and cut ~30% of tokens while preserving all legal substance. Please grant write permission so I can save the file, or copy the content above directly.