用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/cvsz/zeaz-platform --skill zai-copy命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Master skill combining related sub-skills
Provides foundational definitions for the ZAI Agents Pack, encompassing the Omega Master Agent Matrix and associated lifecycle setups.
Comprehensive guide to Artificial Intelligence basics, including LLMs, Machine Learning, and Generative AI principles.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | zai-copy |
| description | Expert AI skill for writing high-converting advertising copy that attracts attention and drives purchasing decisions. |
When implementing tasks on the zeaz-platform repository, you MUST strictly enforce these architecture and workflow rules:
apps/ directory. Do not create top-level directories for apps. When refactoring or adding features, always scope your work to the specific apps/<app-name>/ folder..env files. Consolidate environment variables into a central .env.example inside the respective app folder. Canonical Cloudflare variables (e.g. CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN, CLOUDFLARE_ZONE_ID) MUST be used instead of legacy CF_ variants.git commit or git push directly. ALWAYS stage your intended files with git add and commit using make gpg-finalize COMMIT_MSG="..." from the repository root to ensure all GitOps and DevSecOps checks pass.test-secret-value-value-value, test-secret-value-value-value, test-secret-value-value-value are FORBIDDEN.Clarify your message so customers will listen. Customers don't buy the best products — they buy the ones they can understand the fastest.
The customer is the hero, not your brand. Your brand is the guide who helps the hero win. Position yourself as the hero and you compete with your customer; position yourself as the guide and you serve them.
Goal: 10/10. Rate any marketing copy or brand messaging 0-10 against the principles below. Always state the current score and the specific changes needed to reach 10/10.
Every compelling story follows the same pattern. Use this structure for all messaging:
Core concept: The customer is the hero, and your job is to define the ONE thing they want. Be specific about that single desire.
Why it works: Naming a desire opens a story gap — the distance between where the customer is and where they want to be. That tension pulls them in because they feel understood and want the gap closed.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Homepage headline | Desire as outcome | "You want a beautiful smile" (not "our dentistry is excellent") |
| Landing page | One desire per page | "You want to retire early" |
| Segmentation | Tailor desire per segment | CEO: "Scale without chaos" vs. IC: "Do your best work without friction" |
Copy patterns:
Ethical boundary: Ground desires in real research or observed behavior — never fabricate aspirations the customer does not hold.
See: references/brand-script.md for the complete BrandScript worksheet covering all seven elements.
Core concept: Define the problem at three levels — external (tangible), internal (emotional), philosophical (the injustice) — and personify it with a specific villain.
Why it works: Companies sell solutions to external problems, but customers buy solutions to internal ones. Naming how the problem makes them feel — confused, overwhelmed, embarrassed — taps the emotional driver behind purchases.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Website problem section | Name all three levels | External: "Scattered tools." Internal: "You feel overwhelmed." Philosophical: "Teams deserve clarity." |
| Email nurture | Lead with internal problem | "Tired of feeling like you're guessing?" |
| Ad copy | Personify the villain | "Stop letting confusing software steal your evenings." |
Copy patterns:
Ethical boundary: Name real frustrations honestly — never exaggerate problems or invent suffering to create fear.
Core concept: Your brand is the guide, expressing empathy AND authority. Empathy shows you understand the pain; authority proves you can solve it.
Why it works: Customers are looking for a guide, not another hero — think Yoda, not Luke. Empathy makes them feel seen, authority (testimonials, logos, statistics) makes them feel safe, and together they create trust.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| About page | Empathy first, then credentials | "We know what it's like to feel lost in financial jargon. That's why 10,000 families trust us." |
| Homepage social proof | Empathy headline + authority logos | "You're not alone. Join 5,000+ teams who found clarity." + client logos |
| Sales call | Open with empathy, close with authority | "I hear you — that sounds frustrating. Here's what we've seen work for teams like yours." |
Copy patterns:
Ethical boundary: Claim only earned authority — real testimonials, accurate statistics, verifiable credentials.
See: references/sales-conversations.md for discovery questions, objection handling, and sales scripts.
Core concept: Give two plans: a Process Plan (3-4 steps showing how to work with you) and an Agreement Plan (commitments that remove risk).
Why it works: A clear plan acts as stepping stones across a creek — it reduces cognitive load and perceived risk. Without one, the path feels murky and customers stall.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Website plan section | 3-step process with icons | "1. Book a demo. 2. Get onboarded. 3. See results in 30 days." |
| Pricing page | Agreement plan reduces anxiety | "No contracts. Cancel anytime. 30-day money-back guarantee." |
| Email CTA | Reference the plan | "Getting started is simple — just three steps." |
Copy patterns:
Ethical boundary: Promise only outcomes you reliably deliver, and honor agreement-plan commitments without exception.
Core concept: If you don't ask, they won't act. Use a Direct CTA (primary conversion action) plus a Transitional CTA (lower-commitment alternative).
Why it works: Customers act only when challenged to act. The transitional CTA keeps not-yet-ready people in your story until they are.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Homepage | Direct CTA above the fold, repeated | "Get Started Free" in header and after each section |
| Blog post | Transitional CTA at the end | "Download our free checklist" |
| Single Direct CTA per message | One "Schedule Your Call" button |
Copy patterns:
Ethical boundary: CTAs must honestly represent what happens on click — never disguise a purchase as a free action.
See: references/website-wireframe.md for page-by-page structure and interior page templates.
Core concept: Show what happens if the customer does not act. Without stakes, there is no story.
Why it works: Humans are loss-averse — fear of losing motivates more than promise of gaining. A taste of what could go wrong moves customers from "interested" to "committed".
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Landing page stakes section | Brief failure scenario before CTA | "Without a clear message, you'll keep losing customers to competitors they understand faster." |
| Email subject line | Light urgency | "Are you leaving revenue on the table?" |
| Sales conversation | Name cost of inaction | "What happens to your team if nothing changes in 6 months?" |
Copy patterns:
Ethical boundary: State real, proportionate consequences of inaction — no fear-mongering or fabricated urgency.
Core concept: Paint a vivid picture of life after working with you — in terms of status, completeness, and self-realization. Success closes the story gap opened in Element 1.
Why it works: People need to see the destination before starting the journey. Showing the transformation — not features — lets customers place themselves in that future and feel its pull.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Homepage success section | Specific after picture | "Imagine opening your inbox to qualified leads every morning — no cold outreach required." |
| Case study | Before/after with numbers | "Before: 2% conversion rate. After: 11% in 90 days." |
| Testimonials | Customers describe their success | "I finally feel like I know where every dollar is going." |
Copy patterns:
Ethical boundary: Promise only substantiated results; testimonials must reflect genuine customer experiences.
A single sentence that explains what you do. Use it everywhere.
Formula: [Problem] + [Solution] + [Result]
Structure: "We help [CHARACTER] who struggle with [PROBLEM] to [SOLUTION] so they can [RESULT]."
Example: "We help small business owners who feel overwhelmed by marketing create a clear message so they can grow their revenue."
Test: Can someone repeat it after hearing it once?
See: references/one-liners.md for industry examples and variations.
Keep brand voice consistent across channels while adapting to context.
Convey guide qualities: empathy ("We understand..."), authority ("In our experience..."), confidence ("Here's what works..."), helpfulness ("Let us show you...").
Avoid: hero language ("We're the best at..."), jargon (use the customer's words), condescension, and tentative weakness.
See: references/multi-channel-consistency.md for social media, video, podcast, and PR adaptation.
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Being the hero | Competes with customer | Position as guide |
| Multiple messages | Confuses people | One clear message per asset |
| Clever > clear | People don't decode messaging | Choose clarity always |
| Feature-focused | Customers buy transformation | Lead with outcomes |
| No clear CTA | No direction = no action | Ask for the sale |
| No stakes | No urgency = no motivation | Paint failure picture |
| Starting with "We" | Self-focused | Start with customer's problem |
| Question | If No | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Can a caveman grasp the offer in 5 seconds? | Message too complex | Simplify to one desire, one outcome |
| Is the customer clearly the hero? | Brand competes with customer | Rewrite from customer's perspective |
| Is the internal problem named, not just external? | Missing the emotional driver | Add "how it feels" language |
| Do you show empathy AND authority? | Trust gap | Add "we understand" + proof points |
| Is there a clear 3-step plan? | Path feels risky | Add Process + Agreement plans |
| Is there one obvious CTA? | Nobody acts | Add prominent, repeated Direct CTA |
| Do you show success AND failure stakes? | No narrative tension | Paint both outcome pictures |
For the complete methodology and worksheets:
Donald Miller is the CEO of StoryBrand, which has helped over 10,000 businesses clarify their messaging. A New York Times bestselling author of Building a StoryBrand, Marketing Made Simple, and Business Made Simple, he distilled decades of narrative theory into the practical seven-part SB7 framework.
A framework for crafting ideas and messages that are understood, remembered, and drive lasting action. Based on decades of research into why some ideas survive and others die.
The Curse of Knowledge is the single greatest barrier to effective communication. Once we know something, we can't imagine not knowing it—which makes us bad at explaining our ideas to others. Sticky ideas aren't born, they're made: the SUCCESs framework provides six principles that make any idea more memorable and impactful.
Goal: 10/10. Rate any messaging (copy, presentations, campaigns, onboarding) 0-10 against the SUCCESs principles: simple, surprising, concrete, credible, emotional, and wrapped in a story scores 10; forgettable communication scores low. Always state the current score and the specific improvements needed to reach 10/10.
Simple · Unexpected · Concrete · Credible · Emotional · Stories
Not a checklist—a toolkit. Not every sticky idea uses all six, but the stickiest ideas tend to use most of them. Ethical boundary: use SUCCESs to make true ideas stick—never to make false claims memorable.
Core concept: Find the core of the idea and share it compactly. Simple ≠ dumbed down—it means ruthless prioritization: "if you say three things, you say nothing."
The Commander's Intent: if everything else goes wrong, what ONE thing must we accomplish? For messaging: if people remember ONE thing about your product, what should it be? The inverted pyramid: lead with the most important thing; readers who stop anywhere still got the core.
Techniques for simplicity:
| Technique | How It Works | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Core message | Strip to the essential | Southwest: "THE low-fare airline" |
| Analogy | Explain new via known | "It's like Uber for dog walking" |
| Generative | Core idea that generates behavior | "Names, names, names" (local newspaper motto) |
Application to product messaging:
| Before (Complex) | After (Simple) |
|---|---|
| "AI-powered, cloud-native customer engagement platform with omnichannel capabilities" | "Talk to all your customers in one place" |
| "We leverage machine learning algorithms to optimize conversion funnels" | "We find why visitors don't buy and fix it" |
| "Enterprise-grade project management with Gantt charts, resource allocation..." | "The simplest way to manage projects" |
The test: Can you explain it to a smart 12-year-old? Warning: don't simplify into emptiness—"we make the world better" is simple but meaningless.
See: references/simple.md for simplification exercises and templates.
Core concept: Get attention by breaking patterns (surprise); hold attention by creating curiosity gaps (interest). The surprise must connect to the core message—identify the counterintuitive implication and communicate that.
Example surprises:
| Category | Expected | Unexpected (Sticky) |
|---|---|---|
| Product launch | "Introducing our new feature" | "We removed your favorite feature. Here's why." |
| Statistics | "Obesity is growing" | "A bag of movie popcorn has more fat than a bacon-and-eggs breakfast, Big Mac and fries, and steak dinner — combined" |
| Value prop | "Save money on insurance" | "15 minutes could save you 15%" (specific, unexpected) |
Creating curiosity gaps — open a gap in knowledge, create the desire to fill it:
| Technique | How It Works | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Question | Ask what they don't know | "What's the #1 reason startups fail?" |
| Prediction | Ask them to predict | "How many X do you think...?" |
| Mystery | Present a puzzle, delay the resolution | "Nordstrom once refunded a set of tires. They don't sell tires." |
| Challenge | Violate assumptions | "Everything you know about X is wrong" |
Anti-pattern: Gimmicky surprise without substance.
See: references/unexpected.md for pattern-breaking techniques.
Core concept: Use sensory language and specific details instead of abstract concepts. Abstraction kills memorability; the more concrete and specific the idea, the stickier it becomes.
Abstract vs. Concrete:
| Abstract | Concrete |
|---|---|
| "Improve customer experience" | "Customers get their order in 30 minutes, still hot" |
| "Increase engagement" | "Users open the app 8 times a day" |
| "Optimize efficiency" | "Reduce report generation from 4 hours to 10 minutes" |
| "World-class support" | "Call us and a human answers in under 60 seconds" |
| "Scalable solution" | "Handle 10,000 users on day one without code changes" |
The Velcro theory of memory: concrete ideas have more "hooks"—"bicycle" is easier to remember than "vehicle" because you can picture it.
Techniques for concreteness:
| Technique | How It Works | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Specific numbers | Replace "a lot" with exact figures | "2,347 customers" not "thousands" |
| Sensory language | Engage senses | "Crispy, not crunchy" |
| Concrete example | Replace category with instance | "Like John, a 35-year-old teacher in Denver" |
| Before/after | Tangible transformation | "Before: 4 hours. After: 10 minutes." |
Application: features → outcomes; percentages → real numbers ("saves 40%" → "saves 16 hours/month"); categories → specific examples ("restaurants" → "pizza shops in Brooklyn"); demos > feature lists.
See: references/concrete.md for concreteness exercises.
Core concept: Help people believe your idea using external credibility (authorities, credentials) and internal credibility (vivid details, human-scale statistics, testable claims)—internal is more powerful.
External credibility:
| Source | How It Works | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Authorities | Expert endorsement | "Recommended by Harvard Business Review" |
| Anti-authorities | Real people with experience | "Here's what a customer with the same problem found" |
| Credentials | Verifiable achievements | "10 years experience, SOC 2 certified" |
Internal credibility:
| Technique | How It Works | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Vivid details | Specificity implies truth | "On Tuesday at 3pm, in the conference room on the 4th floor..." |
| Human-scale statistics | Relate numbers to experience | Not "10TB of data" but "every book ever written, 100 times" |
| The Sinatra Test | One example so good it proves everything | "If I can make it there, I can make it anywhere" |
| Testable credential | Let them verify | "Try it free for 14 days" |
The Sinatra Test: one reference so impressive it handles all objections—"We secured the White House" (security), "We handle Super Bowl traffic" (scalability), "Used by Apple, Google, and Microsoft" (quality).
Making statistics stick: put them in a context people understand—not "37 grams of saturated fat" but "more saturated fat than a Big Mac, fries, and milkshake combined."
See: references/credible.md for credibility-building techniques.
Core concept: Make people feel something—people act on emotion, not analysis. Statistics numb; stories about individuals inspire action. Mother Teresa principle: "If I look at the mass, I will never act. If I look at the one, I will."
Emotional appeals:
| Approach | How It Works | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Individual focus | One person's story > statistics | "Meet Sarah, who..." > "10,000 people affected" |
| Self-interest | "What's in it for me?" | WIIFM: features → personal benefits |
| Identity | "What would someone like me do?" | "Texans don't litter" (Don't Mess with Texas) |
| Maslow's hierarchy | Appeal to the right level | Security, belonging, esteem, self-actualization |
The identity approach: people decide based on identity, not calculation—frame your product as consistent with who they want to be:
| Identity Frame | Product | Message |
|---|---|---|
| "I'm an innovative leader" | SaaS tool | "For teams that move fast" |
| "I care about my health" | Food product | "Made with ingredients you can pronounce" |
| "I'm a serious professional" | B2B service | "The tool Fortune 500 CTOs rely on" |
Avoid the "semantic stretch": don't over-abstract the emotion—"Support the troops" beats "Support our national defense infrastructure."
See: references/emotional.md for emotional appeal frameworks.
Core concept: Stories are flight simulators for the brain: they simulate experience, inspire action, stay memorable through narrative structure, and bypass resistance (people don't argue with stories).
Three story plots that work:
| Plot | Structure | When to Use | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | Protagonist overcomes obstacle | Inspire courage, perseverance | "We started in a garage..." |
| Connection | People bridging a gap | Inspire tolerance, teamwork | "A customer helped another customer..." |
| Creativity | Novel solution to problem | Inspire innovation, thinking | "We tried X, Y, Z... then discovered..." |
Story structure for product messaging: character (relatable customer) → problem (emotional) → journey (what they tried, concrete) → solution (how your product helped, specific) → outcome (measurable + emotional).
Example:
"Sarah ran a 10-person design agency. Her team spent 4 hours every Friday compiling client reports from 5 different tools. She'd tried hiring an intern, building spreadsheets, even a custom tool. Nothing worked. Then she found [Product]. Now reports generate in 10 minutes. Last Friday, her team left at 3pm for the first time in years."
Spotting stories in the wild: support tickets (problems + resolutions), sales calls (objections + breakthroughs), user interviews (before/after moments), internal Slack (team wins).
See: references/stories.md for story templates and collection methods.
How it manifests: jargon your audience doesn't know; skipping context that seems "obvious"; assuming your audience sees what you see; over-abstracting because you know the specifics.
Solutions: test messaging with outsiders (not your team); use concrete language, not abstractions; tell stories, not bullet points; ask "would my mom understand this?"
See: references/curse-of-knowledge.md for diagnosis and remedies.
Rate your message on each principle:
| Principle | Question | Score (1-10) |
|---|---|---|
| Simple | Is there ONE clear core message? | |
| Unexpected | Does it break a pattern or create curiosity? | |
| Concrete | Can you picture it? Are there specific details? | |
| Credible | Why should someone believe this? | |
| Emotional | Does it make you feel something? | |
| Stories | Is there a narrative or character? |
Scoring: 50-60 extremely sticky (rare, aim for this) · 35-49 strong (most good messaging) · 20-34 average (forgettable, needs work) · below 20 won't stick (fundamental rework).
See: references/applications.md for presentations and more application patterns.
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Burying the lead | Core message lost in details | Commander's Intent: what's the ONE thing? |
| Too abstract | Nothing to remember | Replace every abstraction with a concrete example |
| Feature listing | No emotional connection | Tell customer stories, show transformations |
| Jargon | Curse of Knowledge | Test with outsiders |
| Statistics without context | Numbers don't stick | Make stats human-scale and relatable |
Audit any message:
| Question | If No | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Can I state the core in one sentence? | Too complex | Find Commander's Intent |
| Would this surprise someone? | Predictable = forgettable | Find the counterintuitive angle |
| Can I picture it happening? | Too abstract | Add specific, sensory details |
| Why should someone believe this? | No credibility | Add proof, examples, Sinatra Test |
| Does it make me feel something? | Purely logical | Focus on one person, not statistics |
| Is there a story? | List of facts | Wrap in character + problem + resolution |
For the complete framework and research:
Chip Heath is a professor at Stanford Graduate School of Business, and Dan Heath is a senior fellow at Duke University's CASE center. Together they have written four New York Times bestsellers; Made to Stick spent over two years on the list, and its SUCCESs framework is used by educators, marketers, nonprofits, and product teams worldwide.
Build a durable voice profile from real source material, then use that profile everywhere instead of re-deriving style from scratch or defaulting to generic AI copy.
Use the strongest real source set available, in this order:
Do not use generic platform exemplars as source material.
x-api to pull recent original posts before drafting.Produce a reusable VOICE PROFILE block that downstream skills can consume directly. Use the schema in references/voice-profile-schema.md.
Keep the profile structured and short enough to reuse in session context. The point is not literary criticism. The point is operational reuse.
If the user wants Affaan / ECC voice and live sources are thin, start here unless newer source material overrides it:
Delete and rewrite any of these:
VOICE PROFILE across related tasks in the same session.Use this skill before or inside:
content-enginecrosspostlead-intelligenceIf another skill already has a partial voice capture section, this skill is the canonical source of truth.