alert-report

name	alert-report
description	Use when summarizing alert triage decisions, key indicators, and immediate actions taken.
category	reporting
version	1.0.0
type	Skill
title	Skill: Alert Investigation Summary Report Runbook
generated	{"by":"process:google-labs-jules","at":"2025-12-21T03:04:42.000Z"}

Alert Investigation Summary Report Runbook

Objective

Generate a standardized report summarizing the key findings from the investigation of a specific security alert or a group of related alerts within a SOAR case. This report is intended for documentation, handover, or escalation purposes.

Scope

This runbook covers gathering essential details about the alert(s), associated events, involved entities, basic enrichment, and producing a structured summary report in Markdown format. It does not typically involve deep-dive analysis or containment actions, which would be covered by other runbooks.

Inputs

• ${CASE_ID}: The relevant SOAR case ID containing the alert(s).
• ${ALERT_GROUP_IDENTIFIERS}: A list of relevant alert group identifiers within the case. Alternatively, provide specific ${ALERT_IDS}.
• (Optional) ${ALERT_IDS}: Comma-separated list of specific alert IDs to focus on if ${ALERT_GROUP_IDENTIFIERS} is not used.
• (Optional) ${REPORT_FILENAME_SUFFIX}: A suffix to append to the report filename (e.g., "initial_triage").

Tools

• secops-soar: get_case_full_details, list_alerts_by_case, list_events_by_alert, get_entities_by_alert_group_identifiers, post_case_comment
• secops-mcp: lookup_entity, search_security_events (optional, for broader context)
• Google Threat Intelligence MCP server: get_ip_address_report, get_domain_report, get_file_report, get_url_report
• write_report

Workflow Steps & Diagram

1. Receive Input & Context: Obtain ${CASE_ID}, ${ALERT_GROUP_IDENTIFIERS} (or ${ALERT_IDS}), and optionally ${REPORT_FILENAME_SUFFIX}. Get case details using soar-mcp_get_case_full_details.
2. Identify Target Alerts & Entities:
   • If using ${ALERT_GROUP_IDENTIFIERS}, use soar-mcp_get_entities_by_alert_group_identifiers to list involved entities. Use soar-mcp_list_alerts_by_case and filter based on the group identifiers (if possible, otherwise use all alerts in the group).
   • If using ${ALERT_IDS}, retrieve details for those specific alerts (potentially from the get_case_full_details output or by iterating list_alerts_by_case if needed). Identify entities directly from these alerts.
   • Compile a list of unique key entities (Users, Hosts, IPs, Hashes, Domains, URLs) involved in the target alert(s). Let this be KEY_ENTITIES.
3. Gather Alert Events:
   • Retrieve underlying UDM events for key alerts. Use soar-mcp_list_events_by_alert for detailed events, or summarize event details available within the soar-mcp_get_case_full_details output if sufficient for a summary perspective.
   • Extract key event details (timestamps, event types, process info, network info, file info).
4. Enrich Key Entities:
   • Initialize an empty structure for enrichment findings.
   • For each entity in KEY_ENTITIES:
     • Use secops-mcp_lookup_entity to get SIEM context (first/last seen, related alerts).
     • Use the appropriate gti-mcp_get_..._report tool based on entity type (IP, Domain, Hash, URL) to get threat intelligence reputation/context.
   • Store enrichment summaries.
5. (Optional) Search Related SIEM Activity:
   • (Guidance: Consider performing this step if initial enrichment reveals highly critical IOCs or if the alert context is unclear).
     • Perform limited secops-mcp_search_security_events queries around the alert timeframe for the most critical entities identified (e.g., the primary host or user) to find immediate related context beyond the specific alert events.

ADK Graph-Based Workflow Diagram

graph TD
    START(["START"]) --> extract_alert_report_payload_node["1. extract_alert_report_payload_node<br/><i>(Extract Alert Payload)</i>"]
    extract_alert_report_payload_node --> fetch_alert_details_node["2. fetch_alert_details_node<br/><i>(Fetch Alert & Entity Details)</i>"]
    fetch_alert_details_node --> alert_report_type_router{"3. alert_report_type_router<br/><i>(Event.actions.route)</i>"}

    alert_report_type_router -- "HIGH_SEVERITY_ALERT_REPORT" --> handle_high_severity_report_branch["4a. handle_high_severity_report_branch<br/><i>(Generate High Severity Report)</i>"]
    alert_report_type_router -- "STANDARD_ALERT_REPORT" --> handle_standard_report_branch["4b. handle_standard_report_branch<br/><i>(Generate Standard Alert Report)</i>"]

    handle_high_severity_report_branch --> document_alert_report_node["5. document_alert_report_node<br/><i>(SOAR Comment & Report Summary)</i>"]
    handle_standard_report_branch --> document_alert_report_node

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Analyst/User
    participant AutomatedAgent as Automated Agent (MCP Client)
    participant SOAR as secops-soar
    participant SIEM as secops-mcp
    participant GTI as Google Threat Intelligence MCP server

    Analyst/User->>AutomatedAgent: Generate Alert Report\nInput: CASE_ID, ALERT_GROUP_IDS/ALERT_IDS, FILENAME_SUFFIX (opt)

    %% Step 1: Context
    AutomatedAgent->>SOAR: get_case_full_details(case_id=CASE_ID)
    SOAR-->>AutomatedAgent: Case Details

    %% Step 2: Identify Alerts & Entities
    alt Use Alert Group IDs
        AutomatedAgent->>SOAR: get_entities_by_alert_group_identifiers(case_id=CASE_ID, alert_group_identifiers=ALERT_GROUP_IDS)
        SOAR-->>AutomatedAgent: Entities List (KEY_ENTITIES)
        AutomatedAgent->>SOAR: list_alerts_by_case(case_id=CASE_ID) %% Filter alerts based on group if possible
        SOAR-->>AutomatedAgent: Target Alert List (A1, A2...)
    else Use Alert IDs
        Note over AutomatedAgent: Extract Target Alerts (A1, A2...) from Case Details or list_alerts_by_case
        Note over AutomatedAgent: Extract KEY_ENTITIES from Target Alerts
    end

    %% Step 3: Gather Alert Events
    loop For each Target Alert Ai
        AutomatedAgent->>SOAR: list_events_by_alert(case_id=CASE_ID, alert_id=Ai)
        SOAR-->>AutomatedAgent: Events for Alert Ai
        Note over AutomatedAgent: Store key event details
    end

    %% Step 4: Enrich Key Entities
    loop For each Entity Ei in KEY_ENTITIES
        AutomatedAgent->>SIEM: lookup_entity(entity_value=Ei)
        SIEM-->>AutomatedAgent: SIEM Summary for Ei
        alt Entity Type is IP/Domain/Hash/URL
            AutomatedAgent->>GTI: get_..._report(ioc=Ei)
            GTI-->>AutomatedAgent: GTI Report Summary for Ei
        end
        Note over AutomatedAgent: Store enrichment findings
    end

    %% Step 5: Optional SIEM Search
    opt Search Related Activity
        loop For critical Entity Ec in KEY_ENTITIES
            AutomatedAgent->>SIEM: search_security_events(text="Activity related to Ec near alert time")
            SIEM-->>AutomatedAgent: Related SIEM Events
            Note over AutomatedAgent: Store summary of related activity
        end
    end

    %% Step 6 & 7: Synthesize & Write Report
    Note over AutomatedAgent: Format report content (ReportMarkdown) (Case Summary, Alert Summary, Entities, Enrichment, Events, Assessment)
    Note over AutomatedAgent: Construct REPORT_NAME_VAR (e.g., alert_report_${CASE_ID}_${REPORT_FILENAME_SUFFIX}_${timestamp}.md)
    AutomatedAgent->>AutomatedAgent: write_report(report_name=REPORT_NAME_VAR, report_contents=ReportMarkdown)
    Note over AutomatedAgent: Report file created

    %% Step 8: Optional SOAR Update
    opt Update SOAR Case
        AutomatedAgent->>SOAR: post_case_comment(case_id=CASE_ID, comment="Alert report generated: alert_report_....md. Summary: [...]")
        SOAR-->>AutomatedAgent: Comment Confirmation
    end

    %% Step 9: Completion
    AutomatedAgent->>Analyst/User: attempt_completion(result="Alert investigation summary report generated for Case CASE_ID.")

## Rubrics

The following rubric is used to evaluate the execution of this **Reporting** runbook by an LLM agent.

### Grading Scale (0-100 Points)

| Criteria | Points | Description |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Data Collection** | 25 | Gathered all necessary data points and metrics for the report. |
| **Report Generation** | 30 | Generated the report in the correct format with accurate content. |
| **Quality & Clarity** | 15 | Ensure the report is readable, well-structured, and error-free. |
| **Delivery** | 15 | Delivered or saved the report to the correct location/recipient. |
| **Operational Artifacts** | 15 | Produced required artifacts: Sequence diagram, execution metadata (date/cost), and summary. |

### Evaluation Criteria Details

#### 1. Data Collection (25 Points)
- **25 pts**: Successfully retrieved all required data (alerts, stats, summaries) from sources.

#### 2. Report Generation (30 Points)
- **15 pts**: Formatted the data correctly into the target template (Markdown, PDF, etc.).
- **15 pts**: Included all required sections (Executive Summary, Details, etc.).

#### 3. Quality & Clarity (15 Points)
- **15 pts**: The generated text is coherent, accurate, and professional.

#### 4. Delivery (15 Points)
- **15 pts**: Successfully saved the file or sent the notification/email as required.

#### 5. Operational Artifacts (15 Points)
- **5 pts**: **Sequence Diagram**: Produced a Mermaid sequence diagram visualizing the steps taken.
- **5 pts**: **Execution Metadata**: Recorded the date, duration, and estimated token cost.
- **5 pts**: **Summary Report**: Generated a concise summary of the actions and outcomes.