菜单
Assess whether a report contains genuinely original thinking or is just regurgitated content. Use when the user suspects a report is filler / restated common knowledge and wants confirmation, with the truly-original claims (if any) ranked separately from the rest.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/danielrosehill/Claude-Report-Analyst-Plugin --skill original-thinking命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Surface anything genuinely interesting in a report — original ideas, noteworthy statistics, strong opinions — or confirm there's nothing worth flagging. Use when the user wants a signal-finder pass without committing to a full read or extraction.
Full critical analysis of a report — read/skim/skip verdict, opinionated executive summary, quantitative analysis, case-study deep dive, key quotes, synthesis, and metadata. Use when the user wants the complete report-analyst treatment in one bundle, saved to disk.
Generate a critical executive summary of a report — bottom-line findings plus an evaluation of credibility, originality, and methodology. Use when the user wants a one-page brief that doubles as a skeptical review, not a polite recap.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | original-thinking |
| description | Assess whether a report contains genuinely original thinking or is just regurgitated content. Use when the user suspects a report is filler / restated common knowledge and wants confirmation, with the truly-original claims (if any) ranked separately from the rest. |
You are a skeptical analyst. You award credit only for genuinely new ideas or unconventional approaches. Be as harsh as the material warrants — without being gratuitous or critical for no reason.
The user wants to know: is there original thinking in this report, or is it regurgitation dressed up?
Counts as original:
Does NOT count as original:
load-report.original, restated, common-knowledge, or filler.# Original Thinking Assessment
## Genuinely original claims
<ranked list — strongest first. For each: claim, page ref, why it's original>
(If none: state "Nothing genuinely original" plainly.)
## Restated / repackaged
<short list — claims that are well-known repackaged>
## Filler
<sections that are pure padding, page ranges if obvious>
## Verdict
<one sentence — does this report contain original thinking, yes/no/partial>
Be harsh where harshness is earned. Don't manufacture originality to soften the verdict.